Gotta just be coincidence that "3 only" days are better than "top 3 when there are more than 3" I'd think?
Tomorrow we got a tie for the 2nd strongest road favorite (Bruins and Wild) to go with the strongest favorite (Blue Jackets).
Don't remember what Dan used to do, I think wait until as close as the game as possible, but the Blue Jackets tip off at noon ET.
Eek!
Tomorrow we got a tie for the 2nd strongest road favorite (Bruins and Wild) to go with the strongest favorite (Blue Jackets).
Don't remember what Dan used to do, I think wait until as close as the game as possible, but the Blue Jackets tip off at noon ET.
Eek!
@race444
When I ran my calculations I would just do two parlays. It works well for a few reasons.
1) MANY times, it hit for both games.
2) Even if it doesn’t, a win following the loss of BOTH would outweigh even the loss of both.
3) If one of them win and the other loses, it pays for the loss (and previous) losses, plus some.
For example, let’s say day 1 you lose your first play for $50 and day 2 you have to play TWO parlays because there’s one major favorite (-135) and two minor favorites who are tied (-130).
if you run two parlays for $100 each, and just OME hits, it pays $207.98. You cover the $100 loss, the $50 loss, and still net $57.98 profit.
If they both hit, obviously you’re WAY up. Either way, you start a new chase.
In the rare event they both lose, your 3X bet will still likely cover the game 1 loss AND both game 2 losses, just less profit than normal.
@race444
When I ran my calculations I would just do two parlays. It works well for a few reasons.
1) MANY times, it hit for both games.
2) Even if it doesn’t, a win following the loss of BOTH would outweigh even the loss of both.
3) If one of them win and the other loses, it pays for the loss (and previous) losses, plus some.
For example, let’s say day 1 you lose your first play for $50 and day 2 you have to play TWO parlays because there’s one major favorite (-135) and two minor favorites who are tied (-130).
if you run two parlays for $100 each, and just OME hits, it pays $207.98. You cover the $100 loss, the $50 loss, and still net $57.98 profit.
If they both hit, obviously you’re WAY up. Either way, you start a new chase.
In the rare event they both lose, your 3X bet will still likely cover the game 1 loss AND both game 2 losses, just less profit than normal.
Could be a monster day...
PARLAY (2 TEAMS)
Risk: $250.00 - Win: $460.37
Columbus Blue Jackets -165
Minnesota Wild -130
PARLAY (2 TEAMS)
Risk: $250.00 - Win: $460.37
Columbus Blue Jackets -165
Boston Bruins -130
PARLAY (5 TEAMS)
Risk: $100.00 - Win: $1,623.11
Columbus Blue Jackets -165
Boston Bruins -130
Carolina Hurricanes -120
Montreal Canadiens -115
Minnesota Wild -130
Could be a monster day...
PARLAY (2 TEAMS)
Risk: $250.00 - Win: $460.37
Columbus Blue Jackets -165
Minnesota Wild -130
PARLAY (2 TEAMS)
Risk: $250.00 - Win: $460.37
Columbus Blue Jackets -165
Boston Bruins -130
PARLAY (5 TEAMS)
Risk: $100.00 - Win: $1,623.11
Columbus Blue Jackets -165
Boston Bruins -130
Carolina Hurricanes -120
Montreal Canadiens -115
Minnesota Wild -130
@race444
Damn..... gutsy, but I'm going to stick with my base play. I'd have to reload my account to double down. I like the play though. Hoping to get this win to avoid the reload but if I gotta reload, I'm doing it. I'm playing both all year no matter what. The research just shows its too good to quit.
@race444
Damn..... gutsy, but I'm going to stick with my base play. I'd have to reload my account to double down. I like the play though. Hoping to get this win to avoid the reload but if I gotta reload, I'm doing it. I'm playing both all year no matter what. The research just shows its too good to quit.
Rough day... two 0-1 losses.
Got my plays in for tomorrow already. Sucks to be on the 8X with a -230, -180, but oh well. If it wins it basically recoups todays double play.
Rough day... two 0-1 losses.
Got my plays in for tomorrow already. Sucks to be on the 8X with a -230, -180, but oh well. If it wins it basically recoups todays double play.
@BlueStar57
Not an option for me, especially right now. All casinos around me are closed.
I went back and read literally every page of this thread. A lot of times people asked Dan if he back tested, and he always said he would when he got time, so I took it upon myself, with the help of Race and Esposito, to back test it a decade. In back testing, we simply went by the two strongest road favorites. No capping. When there was a strong favorite, and two weaker favorites tied, I parlayed the strong favorite with both weak favorites. This was overwhelmingly a winning play over time as well, just didn't work out yesterday.
We know Dan did things a tad bit differently, but he isn't here this year, and the best thing we can do in lieu of his presence is go by the numbers 100%.
@BlueStar57
Not an option for me, especially right now. All casinos around me are closed.
I went back and read literally every page of this thread. A lot of times people asked Dan if he back tested, and he always said he would when he got time, so I took it upon myself, with the help of Race and Esposito, to back test it a decade. In back testing, we simply went by the two strongest road favorites. No capping. When there was a strong favorite, and two weaker favorites tied, I parlayed the strong favorite with both weak favorites. This was overwhelmingly a winning play over time as well, just didn't work out yesterday.
We know Dan did things a tad bit differently, but he isn't here this year, and the best thing we can do in lieu of his presence is go by the numbers 100%.
@race444
Agreed. One of our road favorites got postponed due to covid... not sure how that affects my parlay exactly.
Our favorites are monster favorites today on Dan's system.
Check your PM's for a juicy tidbit on NBA :)
@race444
Agreed. One of our road favorites got postponed due to covid... not sure how that affects my parlay exactly.
Our favorites are monster favorites today on Dan's system.
Check your PM's for a juicy tidbit on NBA :)
I'm hammering Colorado hard. Feel like this bad luck streak can't continue.
$500 on Colorado and $100 on Colorado -2 for $80 to win $120ish.
I'm hammering Colorado hard. Feel like this bad luck streak can't continue.
$500 on Colorado and $100 on Colorado -2 for $80 to win $120ish.
We got so fucked on the -2... Avs miss empty netters, then get a bullshit icing call when they had a guy in position to get an easy empty netter. This crap has to stop at some point.. Our luck will turn soon.
We got so fucked on the -2... Avs miss empty netters, then get a bullshit icing call when they had a guy in position to get an easy empty netter. This crap has to stop at some point.. Our luck will turn soon.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.