Any chasing 3-game road trips? I guess it's the JM system, so to speak.
Anaheim lost last night. I started a Labby with:
A: 25-25-25-25
B: 25-25-25-25
C: 25-25-25-25
After the Anaheim loss, we're now at:
A: 25-25-25-25-43
B: 25-25-25-25-43
C: 25-25-25-25
Atlanta are an "A" play tonight @ Tampa Bay, while Anaheim are a "B" play @ Nashville. Both $156 to win 68. Heavy juice since they're +1.5 puck line plays
Just wondering if anyone else has been following the same system..
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Any chasing 3-game road trips? I guess it's the JM system, so to speak.
Anaheim lost last night. I started a Labby with:
A: 25-25-25-25
B: 25-25-25-25
C: 25-25-25-25
After the Anaheim loss, we're now at:
A: 25-25-25-25-43
B: 25-25-25-25-43
C: 25-25-25-25
Atlanta are an "A" play tonight @ Tampa Bay, while Anaheim are a "B" play @ Nashville. Both $156 to win 68. Heavy juice since they're +1.5 puck line plays
Just wondering if anyone else has been following the same system..
Looks like you are taking the road team ML if favored and PL if dog For the road trip. Is that correct? Good Luck. I do know last season it did not work taking "Road Money Line" for the visiting team against the team with a 3 or more home game stand.
0
Looks like you are taking the road team ML if favored and PL if dog For the road trip. Is that correct? Good Luck. I do know last season it did not work taking "Road Money Line" for the visiting team against the team with a 3 or more home game stand.
I take the Puck Line whenever it's offer at +1.5 for my pick. Otherwise, it's the Money Line on the favorite.
I went through all of last years games, as well as 2008-2009, and there were very minimal losses. Martingale even would have produced some decent units, but a semi-aggreesive Labourchere should work pretty well.
I never bet AGAINST the top 3 RPI rated teams, or ON the teams with the 3 worst road records.
0
I take the Puck Line whenever it's offer at +1.5 for my pick. Otherwise, it's the Money Line on the favorite.
I went through all of last years games, as well as 2008-2009, and there were very minimal losses. Martingale even would have produced some decent units, but a semi-aggreesive Labourchere should work pretty well.
I never bet AGAINST the top 3 RPI rated teams, or ON the teams with the 3 worst road records.
Juice indeed sucks but the Labby system nicely spreads out the losses. Last years NHL schedule showed 147 total bets, with the "A" bet winning 98 times, and the B bet 43. I think there was only 1 loss (dont have my papers in front of me).
That's around 100-110 units, if I'm doing the math correctly.
I also read the home chase thread. Seems just as profitable. Might start following there as well
0
Juice indeed sucks but the Labby system nicely spreads out the losses. Last years NHL schedule showed 147 total bets, with the "A" bet winning 98 times, and the B bet 43. I think there was only 1 loss (dont have my papers in front of me).
That's around 100-110 units, if I'm doing the math correctly.
I also read the home chase thread. Seems just as profitable. Might start following there as well
I'm looking at 3 different systems right now. Not playing all 3 but am documenting all. 1st year betting hockey so I am trying to figure this thing out with the incredibly high juice.
BOL. I'll be following this thread as well.
0
I'm looking at 3 different systems right now. Not playing all 3 but am documenting all. 1st year betting hockey so I am trying to figure this thing out with the incredibly high juice.
Think I will stick to just doing a 2 game chase on the lab system. so my record was: A&B = 134-13
Yeah i think i'll stick to A&B as well. At least to start the year. 134-13 equates to roughly +100 units. With an aggressive 25-25-25-25 labby, increasing lines by +5 with every 2-3 cleared line, that should net roughly $7000 by seasons end
Sounds good to me
0
Quote Originally Posted by SKiLLsSoLoN:
Think I will stick to just doing a 2 game chase on the lab system. so my record was: A&B = 134-13
Yeah i think i'll stick to A&B as well. At least to start the year. 134-13 equates to roughly +100 units. With an aggressive 25-25-25-25 labby, increasing lines by +5 with every 2-3 cleared line, that should net roughly $7000 by seasons end
Yeah i think i'll stick to A&B as well. At least to start the year. 134-13 equates to roughly +100 units. With an aggressive 25-25-25-25 labby, increasing lines by +5 with every 2-3 cleared line, that should net roughly $7000 by seasons end
Sounds good to me
Lets get it on it then bro, have a bankroll set for this.....Get the drift a little abt this system,but if you dont mind shoot me a PM with a lil explanation and how we gonna approach this...looking forward...
0
Quote Originally Posted by smdio:
Yeah i think i'll stick to A&B as well. At least to start the year. 134-13 equates to roughly +100 units. With an aggressive 25-25-25-25 labby, increasing lines by +5 with every 2-3 cleared line, that should net roughly $7000 by seasons end
Sounds good to me
Lets get it on it then bro, have a bankroll set for this.....Get the drift a little abt this system,but if you dont mind shoot me a PM with a lil explanation and how we gonna approach this...looking forward...
What's your total bankroll if you start with 25 -25 -25 -25 ?? 5000$?
And 1 unit = 1 % of bankroll?
$3500
I should have started with a lower line than the 25's, but I really dont think I'll end up losing $3500 with this system. I'd have to lose roughly 6-7 straight bets without winning any, in order to lose the $3500 in total.
That's impossible.
(Hopefully that last line won't help make the Archives!)
0
Quote Originally Posted by onlinesport:
What's your total bankroll if you start with 25 -25 -25 -25 ?? 5000$?
And 1 unit = 1 % of bankroll?
$3500
I should have started with a lower line than the 25's, but I really dont think I'll end up losing $3500 with this system. I'd have to lose roughly 6-7 straight bets without winning any, in order to lose the $3500 in total.
That's impossible.
(Hopefully that last line won't help make the Archives!)
I should have started with a lower line than the 25's, but I really dont think I'll end up losing $3500 with this system. I'd have to lose roughly 6-7 straight bets without winning any, in order to lose the $3500 in total.
That's impossible.
(Hopefully that last line won't help make the Archives!)
My bankroll stands at 10.500 and use lines of 55 . Sounds reasonable right?
0
Quote Originally Posted by smdio:
$3500
I should have started with a lower line than the 25's, but I really dont think I'll end up losing $3500 with this system. I'd have to lose roughly 6-7 straight bets without winning any, in order to lose the $3500 in total.
That's impossible.
(Hopefully that last line won't help make the Archives!)
My bankroll stands at 10.500 and use lines of 55 . Sounds reasonable right?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.