Official (?) RPI 2013 system
How come when I click on "add rpi bets to tracker", for the line on the tracker page it gives the away team all the time and not the team for the system play? Well when the away team is the pick its correct otherwise its wrong.
Not sure, I don't use that feature.
How come when I click on "add rpi bets to tracker", for the line on the tracker page it gives the away team all the time and not the team for the system play? Well when the away team is the pick its correct otherwise its wrong.
Not sure, I don't use that feature.
Sunday - STL wins and Pitt loses on the C game. Can't believe how the Pirates lost that game (balk and error accounted for 2 of Colo's 3 runs).
Record: 91-6
A: 61-36
B: 21-15
C: 9-6
I'm actually still ahead a little for the year but I have not been doing a strict Martingale the whole time, plus I was in Mexico for a loss and couldn't bet. I will keep posting the plays and picking my spots on what series to bet. 5 of the 6 losses were road teams.
If B2W doesn't run this next year (his system after all), I'll gladly do it again. Would love for him to come back and take over, but rest assured it will continue. I also should have used a 4 win difference as a filter instead of 3. We would have had 1 less loss and only 4 or so less wins. That one is on me.
By my calculations the visiting team is 38-5, while the home team is 53-1.
Sunday - STL wins and Pitt loses on the C game. Can't believe how the Pirates lost that game (balk and error accounted for 2 of Colo's 3 runs).
Record: 91-6
A: 61-36
B: 21-15
C: 9-6
I'm actually still ahead a little for the year but I have not been doing a strict Martingale the whole time, plus I was in Mexico for a loss and couldn't bet. I will keep posting the plays and picking my spots on what series to bet. 5 of the 6 losses were road teams.
If B2W doesn't run this next year (his system after all), I'll gladly do it again. Would love for him to come back and take over, but rest assured it will continue. I also should have used a 4 win difference as a filter instead of 3. We would have had 1 less loss and only 4 or so less wins. That one is on me.
By my calculations the visiting team is 38-5, while the home team is 53-1.
PLEASE DON"T !!!!!! THANKS FOR ALL YOUR HARD WORK>
PLEASE DON"T !!!!!! THANKS FOR ALL YOUR HARD WORK>
I wonder if the road teams have always been the culprits in the previous seasons system losses.
Last year we had 1 home loss and one away. In 2011 the lone loss was home.
I'll post all plays that qualify but I'll personally be more selective on away plays.
I wonder if the road teams have always been the culprits in the previous seasons system losses.
Last year we had 1 home loss and one away. In 2011 the lone loss was home.
I'll post all plays that qualify but I'll personally be more selective on away plays.
I don't know what you guys think but i find this way very bankroll friendly and mostly 'gray hair friendly' :))
Finally, lets kill the end of the season and go easy on the plays, try adjusting units, cause some teams won't be motivated to show up, when they reach good playoff spot.
BOL to all
AND A HUGE THANKS TO DANRULES for keeping this thing goin !!
I don't know what you guys think but i find this way very bankroll friendly and mostly 'gray hair friendly' :))
Finally, lets kill the end of the season and go easy on the plays, try adjusting units, cause some teams won't be motivated to show up, when they reach good playoff spot.
BOL to all
AND A HUGE THANKS TO DANRULES for keeping this thing goin !!
Rice,
I started your theory later in June with good results. I also tweeked Degen's sheet to color code qualifying home teams that are on the "A" game, dependent on thier current streak to help in my discretion of betting "a little bigger" on that team. For instance, instead of the qualifying team highlighted Blue, it highlights a color code if they qualify and start the series with a current L2, L3 or L4 record. It has worked well gaining another .25 to .5 additional units dependant on my discretion on the series for home teams that come into a qualifying series with a L2 or greater streak. Pretty simple concept but maybe somthing to think about going forward.
Rice,
I started your theory later in June with good results. I also tweeked Degen's sheet to color code qualifying home teams that are on the "A" game, dependent on thier current streak to help in my discretion of betting "a little bigger" on that team. For instance, instead of the qualifying team highlighted Blue, it highlights a color code if they qualify and start the series with a current L2, L3 or L4 record. It has worked well gaining another .25 to .5 additional units dependant on my discretion on the series for home teams that come into a qualifying series with a L2 or greater streak. Pretty simple concept but maybe somthing to think about going forward.
I like seeing all the comments and different ways people structure their bets/money mangement. Have to admit that I'm very conservative on my bets and probably betting too low for my bankroll. I try to think of a 3 game loss at -200 odds and what that would do to my bankroll. I structure my betting.
ssquerd mentioned an agressive labby line method that works well. It does take getting used to but it spreads out the risk. We have way more A and B game wins than C game plays, so clearing lines is not difficult.
Let's crush these last 3 weeks on the official system.
I like seeing all the comments and different ways people structure their bets/money mangement. Have to admit that I'm very conservative on my bets and probably betting too low for my bankroll. I try to think of a 3 game loss at -200 odds and what that would do to my bankroll. I structure my betting.
ssquerd mentioned an agressive labby line method that works well. It does take getting used to but it spreads out the risk. We have way more A and B game wins than C game plays, so clearing lines is not difficult.
Let's crush these last 3 weeks on the official system.
Hearing about Darvish's near perfect game today made me think - crap - That is a 4-game wrap-around series. Texas should have been another 3-game chase on Saturday (and winner of course). For those tracking, update your records accordingly.
You are right, I completely missed it. Sorry guys!
We should have started another 3 game chase on Saturday after Friday's win. I'm going to include this in the official record stats as a win on the A game Saturday to properly reflect the system record. Can't believe I missed that. ![]()
Record: 92-6
A: 62-36
B: 21-15
C: 9-6
Hearing about Darvish's near perfect game today made me think - crap - That is a 4-game wrap-around series. Texas should have been another 3-game chase on Saturday (and winner of course). For those tracking, update your records accordingly.
You are right, I completely missed it. Sorry guys!
We should have started another 3 game chase on Saturday after Friday's win. I'm going to include this in the official record stats as a win on the A game Saturday to properly reflect the system record. Can't believe I missed that. ![]()
Record: 92-6
A: 62-36
B: 21-15
C: 9-6
Monday - Det and Atlanta lose on the A game, go to B game Tuesday. KC wins on the A game.
Record: 93-6
A: 63-38
B: 21-15
C: 9-6
Monday - Det and Atlanta lose on the A game, go to B game Tuesday. KC wins on the A game.
Record: 93-6
A: 63-38
B: 21-15
C: 9-6
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
446,847
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
256,981
-
Sunday 09/13/2026
637
-
I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters
57,654
-
9/12 🔥🔥??????
4,304
-
NFL LOCKED IN!
96,660
-
Week One-Post Week One Plays Here
1,545
-
Buckeyes/Longhorns in game
1,038
-
***Macwesties * Sun. Sept 13, 2026 * NFL * Week #1* Football Plays***
6,084
-
DK NFL Week 1 Picks
8,317
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
