Plays for 4/23:
System record 22-0-1
Additional series 3-0-0
Series #28 (game 1) 7:10 bal @ BOS -225, RL
Series #29 (game 1) 7:10 tor @ TB -225, RL
Series #30 (game 1) 8:05 pit @ HOU -160
Series #31 (game 1) 10:05 cle @ OAK -146
Series #32 (game 1) 9:40 PHI -175 @ ariz
Series 33 (game 1) 10:15 stl @ SF -160
BOL
Game 1 wins =19
Game 2 wins = 2
Game 3 wins = 1
Plays for 4/23:
System record 22-0-1
Additional series 3-0-0
Series #28 (game 1) 7:10 bal @ BOS -225, RL
Series #29 (game 1) 7:10 tor @ TB -225, RL
Series #30 (game 1) 8:05 pit @ HOU -160
Series #31 (game 1) 10:05 cle @ OAK -146
Series #32 (game 1) 9:40 PHI -175 @ ariz
Series 33 (game 1) 10:15 stl @ SF -160
BOL
Game 1 wins =19
Game 2 wins = 2
Game 3 wins = 1
5858,
You would have to PM me with your email for me to send you the database. I am not sure what the average opening line is for these series but I could figure it out... I am guessing prob in -165-170 range off the top of my head. Yeah based on the losses IL play would have caused the last couple of years we have decided to exclude those series. Just so you know their is data back to 1999 on covers also by just looking at the team section and past results. When I was first getting started I loaded all the teams into excel, so that may be helpful also.
5858,
You would have to PM me with your email for me to send you the database. I am not sure what the average opening line is for these series but I could figure it out... I am guessing prob in -165-170 range off the top of my head. Yeah based on the losses IL play would have caused the last couple of years we have decided to exclude those series. Just so you know their is data back to 1999 on covers also by just looking at the team section and past results. When I was first getting started I loaded all the teams into excel, so that may be helpful also.
Plays for 4/23:
System record 22-0-1
Additional series 3-0-0
Series #28 (game 1) 7:10 bal @ BOS -225, RL
Series #29 (game 1) 7:10 tor @ TB -225, RL
Series #30 (game 1) 8:05 pit @ HOU -160
Series #31 (game 1) 10:05 cle @ OAK -146
Series #32 (game 1) 9:40 PHI -175 @ ariz
Series 33 (game 1) 10:15 stl @ SF -160
BOL
Game 1 wins =19
Game 2 wins = 2
Game 3 wins = 1
Just wanted to make a few comments about these games. I am thinking of trying to incorporate some filters on these series using teamrankings. The series that would be filtered out in this case would be TB and SF because the teams they are playing have a higher rating on the road then they have at home??? The problem is it is still very early in the year so there is not a lot of data. Anyone have any thoughts on potentially using this as a filter or these series in particular??
Plays for 4/23:
System record 22-0-1
Additional series 3-0-0
Series #28 (game 1) 7:10 bal @ BOS -225, RL
Series #29 (game 1) 7:10 tor @ TB -225, RL
Series #30 (game 1) 8:05 pit @ HOU -160
Series #31 (game 1) 10:05 cle @ OAK -146
Series #32 (game 1) 9:40 PHI -175 @ ariz
Series 33 (game 1) 10:15 stl @ SF -160
BOL
Game 1 wins =19
Game 2 wins = 2
Game 3 wins = 1
Just wanted to make a few comments about these games. I am thinking of trying to incorporate some filters on these series using teamrankings. The series that would be filtered out in this case would be TB and SF because the teams they are playing have a higher rating on the road then they have at home??? The problem is it is still very early in the year so there is not a lot of data. Anyone have any thoughts on potentially using this as a filter or these series in particular??
The other filter I was thinking about incorporating is to not play on a team to win that is under 50% for their last 10 games unless they have won 2/3 or 3/4... This filter would also eliminate the SF series if we were to use a double filter???
The other filter I was thinking about incorporating is to not play on a team to win that is under 50% for their last 10 games unless they have won 2/3 or 3/4... This filter would also eliminate the SF series if we were to use a double filter???
rizz,
you can add what you like the question I have is the system is pretty close to perfect so far I would maybe track the filters and implement them when the system starts to fade in its percentage
rizz,
you can add what you like the question I have is the system is pretty close to perfect so far I would maybe track the filters and implement them when the system starts to fade in its percentage
Yeah,
I looked back at the 50% over previous 10 filter and it would have eliminated losses and not any wins... can consider using it as a second level but definitely not a first level filter. I think the teamrankings may be helpful especially when it is more established via more games to add to it.
Yeah,
I looked back at the 50% over previous 10 filter and it would have eliminated losses and not any wins... can consider using it as a second level but definitely not a first level filter. I think the teamrankings may be helpful especially when it is more established via more games to add to it.
Results for 4/23:
System record 26-0-1
Additional series 3-0-0
Series #28 (game 1 wins) bal @ BOS -225 , RL
Series #29 (game 1) 7:10 tor @ TB -225 , RL
Series #30 (game 1) 8:05 pit @ HOU -160
Series #31 (game 1) 10:05 cle @ OAK -146
Series #32 (game 1) 9:40 PHI -175 @ ariz
Series 33 (game 1) 10:15 stl @ SF -160
Game 1 wins =23
Game 2 wins = 2
Game 3 wins = 1
Results for 4/23:
System record 26-0-1
Additional series 3-0-0
Series #28 (game 1 wins) bal @ BOS -225 , RL
Series #29 (game 1) 7:10 tor @ TB -225 , RL
Series #30 (game 1) 8:05 pit @ HOU -160
Series #31 (game 1) 10:05 cle @ OAK -146
Series #32 (game 1) 9:40 PHI -175 @ ariz
Series 33 (game 1) 10:15 stl @ SF -160
Game 1 wins =23
Game 2 wins = 2
Game 3 wins = 1
Plays for 4/24:
System record 26-0-1
Additional series 3-0-0
**Series #28 (game 2) 7:10 bal @ BOS -195, RL **
Series #29 (game 2) 6:10 tor @ TB -140
Series #32 (game 2) 8:10 PHI -110 @ ariz
*** only included for those chasing on RL or if pushed -1 and want to try again. Already included as a game 1 system win.***
We actually missed a play today. We should have been on the CWS also. I did not notice the line went above -150. sorry everyone.
Game 1 wins =23
Game 2 wins = 2
Game 3 wins = 1
Plays for 4/24:
System record 26-0-1
Additional series 3-0-0
**Series #28 (game 2) 7:10 bal @ BOS -195, RL **
Series #29 (game 2) 6:10 tor @ TB -140
Series #32 (game 2) 8:10 PHI -110 @ ariz
*** only included for those chasing on RL or if pushed -1 and want to try again. Already included as a game 1 system win.***
We actually missed a play today. We should have been on the CWS also. I did not notice the line went above -150. sorry everyone.
Game 1 wins =23
Game 2 wins = 2
Game 3 wins = 1
Okay, this is interesting.... For NL 2009 = 58-5 for opening o/u 9 or higer covering on RL for any spread...
The other thing that is interesting is that combining the AL and NL there were only 2 ML losses = 142-2 for these subsets of games.
Okay, this is interesting.... For NL 2009 = 58-5 for opening o/u 9 or higer covering on RL for any spread...
The other thing that is interesting is that combining the AL and NL there were only 2 ML losses = 142-2 for these subsets of games.
Results for 4/24:
System record 28-0-1
Additional series 3-0-0
**Series #28 (game 2) bal @ BOS -175 , RL
Series #29 (game 2) 6:10 tor @ TB -140
Series #32 (game 2) 8:10 PHI -110 @ ariz
*** only included for those chasing on RL or if pushed -1 and want to try again. Already included as a game 1 system win.***
Board is clear!
Game 1 wins =23
Game 2 wins = 4
Game 3 wins = 1
Results for 4/24:
System record 28-0-1
Additional series 3-0-0
**Series #28 (game 2) bal @ BOS -175 , RL
Series #29 (game 2) 6:10 tor @ TB -140
Series #32 (game 2) 8:10 PHI -110 @ ariz
*** only included for those chasing on RL or if pushed -1 and want to try again. Already included as a game 1 system win.***
Board is clear!
Game 1 wins =23
Game 2 wins = 4
Game 3 wins = 1
Comparisons:
2009:
playing all series on ML = 246-7
o/u 9+ filter = 142-2
under 9 = 104-5
2008
all series on ML = 258-10
o/u 9+ filter = 167-3
under 9 = 91-7
*** I am a little surprised by this finding, but strangely enough playing the series that start under 9 are not adding much value, especially if the juice is high. I am going to mark the series O/U from now on. I am considering playing the series where the o/u is 9 or higher for 2U instead of 1. Interested to read others opinions about this??? If we could use the oddsmakers knowledge against them to not only select series and a filter could be the ultimate coup!
Comparisons:
2009:
playing all series on ML = 246-7
o/u 9+ filter = 142-2
under 9 = 104-5
2008
all series on ML = 258-10
o/u 9+ filter = 167-3
under 9 = 91-7
*** I am a little surprised by this finding, but strangely enough playing the series that start under 9 are not adding much value, especially if the juice is high. I am going to mark the series O/U from now on. I am considering playing the series where the o/u is 9 or higher for 2U instead of 1. Interested to read others opinions about this??? If we could use the oddsmakers knowledge against them to not only select series and a filter could be the ultimate coup!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.