2-0 tonight if anyone played these series. Will not include in the system record but am thinking of including these as optional series or something like that
Plays for 5/4:
System record 46-2-1
Additional series 3-0-0
Series Game Time Teams o/u TR diff
Series #54 (G1) 10:05 COL -136 @ sd pending
Series #56 (G1) 7:05 CHC -150 @ pit 8 ?
Series #57 (G1) 10:10 mil @ LAD -200,RL 8.5 ?
Series #58 (G1) 7:05 sf -169 @ FLA 7 ?
**meet o/u filter of 9+
will personally be playing on sd if col wins game 1
TR diffs(for reference only)
Series Prices (for future reference only)
Game 1 wins =33
Game 2 wins = 11
Game 3 wins = 2
*Losses = 2 , -27.8U
*units lost reflects playing all games on the ML martingale for 3 games, not recommended*
Plays for 5/4:
System record 47-2-1
Additional series 3-0-0
Series Game Time Teams o/u TR diff
Series #54 (G1) 10:05 COL -136 @ sd
Series #56 (G1) 7:05 CHC -150 @ pit 8 ?
Series #57 (G1) 10:10 mil @ LAD -200,RL 8.5 ?
Series #58 (G1) 7:05 sf -169 @ FLA 7 ?
**meet o/u filter of 9+
will personally be playing on sd if col wins game 1
TR diffs(for reference only)
Series Prices (for future reference only)
Game 1 wins =34
Game 2 wins = 11
Game 3 wins = 2
*Losses = 2 , -27.8U
*units lost reflects playing all games on the ML martingale for 3 games, not recommended*
Lets run some sample labby lines so everyone can try to get this figured out. This is how I would start these plays
5-5-5-5, bet CWS, BOS 17 to win 10, COL 14, NYY 15 (RL)
5-5-5-5
5-5-5-5
Of course the time try to run a sample labby line, everyone wins...gotta love it
Plays for 5/4:
System record 47-2-1
Additional series 3-0-0
Series Game Time Teams o/u TR diff
Series #56 (G1) 7:05 CHC -150 @ pit 8 +2.6
Series #57 (G1) 10:10 mil @ LAD -200,RL115 8.5 +1.3
Series #58 (G1) 7:05 SF -169 @ fla 7 -0.4
OPTIONAL SERIES (Non System) 2-0
-Two game chase on SD -135 vs col
**meet o/u filter of 9+
TR diffs(for reference only)
Series Prices (for future reference only)
CHC -170
SF -145
LAD -240
Game 1 wins =34
Game 2 wins = 11
Game 3 wins = 2
*Losses = 2 , -27.8U
*units lost reflects playing all games on the ML martingale for 3 games, not recommended*
A thought for those that like to play martingale. I am seeing a couple of trends that we may be able to take advantage of. Games 1 and 2 are making us money and right now game 3 is not helping us. If you like martingale you may want to consider playing this as a two game chase. If done this way the record right now would be 45-4 with less units lost. Game 3's were very successful in previous seasons which is why they were included. One may consider betting straight martingale for games 1 and 2 then rather than making a huge wager in game 3 just play to recoup your game 1 loss. Here are the numbers from previous seasons for a two game chase:
2010: 45-4, Game 3's are 2-2
2009: 226-27, Game 3's were 20-7
2008: 235-33, Game 3's were 23-10
2007: 230-35 Game 3's were 22-13
Combined: 691-95, (88%) Game 3's were 65-30
Playing this way this season you would have won 45 U and lost around 23U netting about +21U so far with less risk placed on your bankroll. Something to consider if you want to take less risk. Hopefully the game 3's will get back in line with previous seasons and it will be less of an issue, but something to consider if you don't like the labby approach.
Results for 5/4:
System record 48-2-1
Additional series 3-0-0
Series Game Time Teams o/u TR diff
Series #56 (G1) 7:05 CHC -150 @ pit 
Series #57 (G1) 10:10 mil @ LAD -200,RL115 pend
Series #58 (G1) 7:05 SF -169 @ fla
OPTIONAL SERIES (Non System) 2-0
-Two game chase on SD -135 vs col --- pending
**meet o/u filter of 9+
TR diffs(for reference only)
Series Prices (for future reference only)
Game 1 wins =35
Game 2 wins = 11
Game 3 wins = 2
*Losses = 2 , -27.8U
*units lost reflects playing all games on the ML martingale for 3 games, not recommended*
sample labbys (aggressive style)
5-5-5-5 9 on LAD to win 10 RL, 15 to win 10 chc, 17 / win 10 sf
5-5-5-5
5-5-5-5
Cross off the 10 won by sf and add half of your two losses to end of line one and two
x-5-17-x
5-5-5-17
5-5-5-5
Conservative lines after losses
x-5-5-x-12
5-5-5-5-12 --- would play game 2's tomorrow to win 17
5-5-5-5
The dodgers have been overrated all season. The thing that really concerns me is the brewers. These guys are consistently causing losses in my systems because they go from burning hot to sucking ass. Really don't want to get burned by them again. Have considered not playing any series they are involved with and still might not chase this series even though I know the labby can absorb it.
Results for 5/4:
System record 48-2-1
Additional series 3-0-0
Series Game Time Teams o/u TR diff
Series #56 (G1) 7:05 CHC -150 @ pit
Series #57 (G1) 10:10 mil @ LAD -200,RL115 pend
Series #58 (G1) 7:05 SF -169 @ fla
OPTIONAL SERIES (Non System) 3-0
-Two game chase on SD -135 vs col ---
**meet o/u filter of 9+
TR diffs(for reference only)
Series Prices (for future reference only)
Game 1 wins =35
Game 2 wins = 11
Game 3 wins = 2
*Losses = 2 , -27.8U
*units lost reflects playing all games on the ML martingale for 3 games, not recommended*
Plays for 5/5:
System record 48-2-1
Additional series 3-0-0
Series Game Time Teams o/u TR diff
Series #56 (G2) 7:05 CHC -151 @ pit
Series #57 (G2) 10:10 mil @ LAD -191,RL125
OPTIONAL SERIES (Non System) 3-0
**meet o/u filter of 9+
TR diffs(for reference only)
Series Prices (for future reference only)
Game 1 wins =35
Game 2 wins = 11
Game 3 wins = 2
*Losses = 2 , -27.8U
*units lost reflects playing all games on the ML martingale for 3 games, not recommended*
Plays for 5/5:
System record 48-2-1
Additional series 3-0-0
Series Game Time Teams o/u TR diff
Series #56 (G2) 7:05 CHC -151 @ pit
Series #57 (G2) 10:10 mil @ LAD -191,RL125
OPTIONAL SERIES (Non System) 3-0
**meet o/u filter of 9+
TR diffs(for reference only)
Series Prices (for future reference only)
Game 1 wins =35
Game 2 wins = 11
Game 3 wins = 2
*Losses = 2 , -27.8U
*units lost reflects playing all games on the ML martingale for 3 games, not recommended*
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
