have you found any significance to the TR diff and a % of series wins vs just betting the system as is?
have you found any significance to the TR diff and a % of series wins vs just betting the system as is?
Nothing concrete as of yet. We are definitely not helping ourselves much thus far playing on road teams. I posted the numbers on the previous page. 2 of the 3 losses have come from road plays. As the rankings get more settled in we may see more patterns we can capitalize on
have you found any significance to the TR diff and a % of series wins vs just betting the system as is?
Nothing concrete as of yet. We are definitely not helping ourselves much thus far playing on road teams. I posted the numbers on the previous page. 2 of the 3 losses have come from road plays. As the rankings get more settled in we may see more patterns we can capitalize on
Plays for 5/13:
System record 59-3-1
Additional series 3-0-0
Series Game Time Teams o/u TR diff
Series #67 (G3) 1:40 hou @ STL -220, RL -130
*Series #68 (G1) 8:40 was @ COL -190, RL 100
Guys, I got a push on colorado as I play anything above 190 on RL will update lines according to that.
OPTIONAL SERIES (Non System)
**meet o/u filter of 9+
TR diffs(for reference only)
Series Prices (for future reference only)
Game 1 wins =40
Game 2 wins = 13
Game 3 wins = 6
*Losses = 3 , -42.6U (Martingale)
+34.0U aggressive labby updated 5/12 PM
5-5-5-41-39 (push)
x-x-x-x-51
x-5-56-39 (lost 78, put half here, half to 1, new line
bad day guys.
Plays for 5/13:
System record 59-3-1
Additional series 3-0-0
Series Game Time Teams o/u TR diff
Series #67 (G3) 1:40 hou @ STL -220, RL -130
*Series #68 (G1) 8:40 was @ COL -190, RL 100
Guys, I got a push on colorado as I play anything above 190 on RL will update lines according to that.
OPTIONAL SERIES (Non System)
**meet o/u filter of 9+
TR diffs(for reference only)
Series Prices (for future reference only)
Game 1 wins =40
Game 2 wins = 13
Game 3 wins = 6
*Losses = 3 , -42.6U (Martingale)
+34.0U aggressive labby updated 5/12 PM
5-5-5-41-39 (push)
x-x-x-x-51
x-5-56-39 (lost 78, put half here, half to 1, new line
bad day guys.
Plays for 5/14:
System record 59-4-1
Additional series 3-0-0
Series Game Time Teams o/u TR diff
*Series #69 (G1) 2:20 pit @ CHC -199, RL -110 10
*Series #68 (G1/2) 8:40 was @ COL -228, RL -120
*Series #70 (G1) 7:05 min @ NYY -168 9.5
Series #71 (G1) 7:10 sea @ TB -182 8.5
OPTIONAL SERIES (Non System)
**meet o/u filter of 9+
TR diffs(for reference only)
Series Prices (for future reference only)
Game 1 wins =40
Game 2 wins = 13
Game 3 wins = 6
*Losses = 3 , -42.6U+ pending (Martingale)
+34.0U aggressive labby updated 5/14 PM
5-5-5-41-39
x-x-x-x-51
x-5-56-39
Plays for 5/14:
System record 59-4-1
Additional series 3-0-0
Series Game Time Teams o/u TR diff
*Series #69 (G1) 2:20 pit @ CHC -199, RL -110 10
*Series #68 (G1/2) 8:40 was @ COL -228, RL -120
*Series #70 (G1) 7:05 min @ NYY -168 9.5
Series #71 (G1) 7:10 sea @ TB -182 8.5
OPTIONAL SERIES (Non System)
**meet o/u filter of 9+
TR diffs(for reference only)
Series Prices (for future reference only)
Game 1 wins =40
Game 2 wins = 13
Game 3 wins = 6
*Losses = 3 , -42.6U+ pending (Martingale)
+34.0U aggressive labby updated 5/14 PM
5-5-5-41-39
x-x-x-x-51
x-5-56-39
Series info:
min (4, 102.0) @ NYY (1, 105.5) = +3, +3.5 NYY -200
sea (29, 96.9) @ TB (10, 101.3) = +19, +4.4 TB -280
pit (30,95.3) @ CHC (24, 98.3) = +6, +3.0 ??
Series info:
min (4, 102.0) @ NYY (1, 105.5) = +3, +3.5 NYY -200
sea (29, 96.9) @ TB (10, 101.3) = +19, +4.4 TB -280
pit (30,95.3) @ CHC (24, 98.3) = +6, +3.0 ??
i think i am going to play each series start with the filter of 9 or higher o/u. Your numbers seem to support a great rate of return.
Considering playing the last game of series if home fav lost first two.
trying to eliminate or at least cut the rate of having bad weeks like these past two.
i think i am going to play each series start with the filter of 9 or higher o/u. Your numbers seem to support a great rate of return.
Considering playing the last game of series if home fav lost first two.
trying to eliminate or at least cut the rate of having bad weeks like these past two.
i think i am going to play each series start with the filter of 9 or higher o/u. Your numbers seem to support a great rate of return.
Considering playing the last game of series if home fav lost first two.
trying to eliminate or at least cut the rate of having bad weeks like these past two.
yeah jake, i hear you. It has been rough the last few weeks. Dogs have been barking like crazy lately. I have also been noticing teams that cause us a loss end up winning the next game, so I took a shot with STL tonight and won. of course, thanks to the cubs and rays I still ended up in the negative because of the juice. The labby lines should get most of it back for us over time but in the short term not very good. I have been playing all the games at least on -1 and a lot of -1.5 because I just can't justify laying the juice on some of these teams. The lines are going to be getting too large. I would recommend splitting them until things settle down some. We are going to have a break coming up with a lot of two game series next week and then interleague games. I was hoping we would have gotten a lot of our losses back this weekend but we are not off to a great start.
i think i am going to play each series start with the filter of 9 or higher o/u. Your numbers seem to support a great rate of return.
Considering playing the last game of series if home fav lost first two.
trying to eliminate or at least cut the rate of having bad weeks like these past two.
yeah jake, i hear you. It has been rough the last few weeks. Dogs have been barking like crazy lately. I have also been noticing teams that cause us a loss end up winning the next game, so I took a shot with STL tonight and won. of course, thanks to the cubs and rays I still ended up in the negative because of the juice. The labby lines should get most of it back for us over time but in the short term not very good. I have been playing all the games at least on -1 and a lot of -1.5 because I just can't justify laying the juice on some of these teams. The lines are going to be getting too large. I would recommend splitting them until things settle down some. We are going to have a break coming up with a lot of two game series next week and then interleague games. I was hoping we would have gotten a lot of our losses back this weekend but we are not off to a great start.
Plays for 5/14:
System record 59-4-1
Additional series 3-0-0
Series Game Time Teams o/u TR diff
*Series #69 (G1) 2:20 pit @ CHC -199, RL -110
*Series #68 (G1/2) 8:40 was @ COL -228, RL -120 ppd
*Series #70 (G1) 7:05 min @ NYY -168
Series #71 (G1) 7:10 sea @ TB -182
OPTIONAL SERIES (Non System)
**meet o/u filter of 9+
TR diffs(for reference only)
Series Prices (for future reference only)
Game 1 wins =40
Game 2 wins = 13
Game 3 wins = 6
*Losses = 3 , -42.6U+ pending (Martingale)
+26.6U aggressive labby updated 5/14 PM
x-5-5-41-x-59 (won 44, lost 48 + 70.4)
5-5-5-51-59
x-5-56-39
if your lines are getting too fat consider splitting your last numbers. we need a rally really badly!
Plays for 5/14:
System record 59-4-1
Additional series 3-0-0
Series Game Time Teams o/u TR diff
*Series #69 (G1) 2:20 pit @ CHC -199, RL -110
*Series #68 (G1/2) 8:40 was @ COL -228, RL -120 ppd
*Series #70 (G1) 7:05 min @ NYY -168
Series #71 (G1) 7:10 sea @ TB -182
OPTIONAL SERIES (Non System)
**meet o/u filter of 9+
TR diffs(for reference only)
Series Prices (for future reference only)
Game 1 wins =40
Game 2 wins = 13
Game 3 wins = 6
*Losses = 3 , -42.6U+ pending (Martingale)
+26.6U aggressive labby updated 5/14 PM
x-5-5-41-x-59 (won 44, lost 48 + 70.4)
5-5-5-51-59
x-5-56-39
if your lines are getting too fat consider splitting your last numbers. we need a rally really badly!
Plays for 5/15:
System record 60-4-1
Additional series 3-0-0
Series Game Time Teams o/u TR diff
*Series #69 (G2) 1:05 pit @ CHC -240, RL -115
*Series #68 (G1/2) 2:10 was @ COL -240, RL -120
Series #71 (G2) 4:10 sea @ TB -210, RL even
OPTIONAL SERIES (Non System)
**meet o/u filter of 9+
TR diffs(for reference only)
Series Prices (for future reference only)
Game 1 wins =41
Game 2 wins = 13
Game 3 wins = 6
*Losses = 3 , -42.6U+ pending (Martingale)
+26.6U aggressive labby updated 5/14 PM
x-5-5-41-x-59
5-5-5-51-59
x-5-56-39
if your lines are getting too fat consider splitting your last numbers. we need a rally really badly!
Plays for 5/15:
System record 60-4-1
Additional series 3-0-0
Series Game Time Teams o/u TR diff
*Series #69 (G2) 1:05 pit @ CHC -240, RL -115
*Series #68 (G1/2) 2:10 was @ COL -240, RL -120
Series #71 (G2) 4:10 sea @ TB -210, RL even
OPTIONAL SERIES (Non System)
**meet o/u filter of 9+
TR diffs(for reference only)
Series Prices (for future reference only)
Game 1 wins =41
Game 2 wins = 13
Game 3 wins = 6
*Losses = 3 , -42.6U+ pending (Martingale)
+26.6U aggressive labby updated 5/14 PM
x-5-5-41-x-59
5-5-5-51-59
x-5-56-39
if your lines are getting too fat consider splitting your last numbers. we need a rally really badly!
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. I didn't play cubs today but did put them in a parlay with col and phi. I don't understand their lines being so high. I think the books just love seeing people pay the chalk on them plus this series is a JM chase series and seems like they jack the chalk up in these cases also. Some of the filters we are coming up with are a little arbitrary but look at chc ranking. I don't think we should be laying that much on the 24th ranked home team. I post all the potential plays especially for tracking but my feeling is this is the type of series we will be filtering out next season based on the ranking alone.
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. I didn't play cubs today but did put them in a parlay with col and phi. I don't understand their lines being so high. I think the books just love seeing people pay the chalk on them plus this series is a JM chase series and seems like they jack the chalk up in these cases also. Some of the filters we are coming up with are a little arbitrary but look at chc ranking. I don't think we should be laying that much on the 24th ranked home team. I post all the potential plays especially for tracking but my feeling is this is the type of series we will be filtering out next season based on the ranking alone.
Rizz: need to ask if you can post the game break down for all games using the o/u 9 filter (just like you do for all games played)?
With o/u 9+ filter in place:
Record = 28-1 all teams, 23-0 home teams
All teams:
G1 = 17-12
G2 = 8-4
G3 = 3-1
Home teams
G1 = 16 - 7
G2 = 5-2
G3 = 2-0
Of course we have our friends the cubs waiting as a game 3 as a home team who passes the o/u filter.
Rizz: need to ask if you can post the game break down for all games using the o/u 9 filter (just like you do for all games played)?
With o/u 9+ filter in place:
Record = 28-1 all teams, 23-0 home teams
All teams:
G1 = 17-12
G2 = 8-4
G3 = 3-1
Home teams
G1 = 16 - 7
G2 = 5-2
G3 = 2-0
Of course we have our friends the cubs waiting as a game 3 as a home team who passes the o/u filter.
I did that at some point. It was 152-2 with the o/u filter, I posted the game breakdowns also.
I did that at some point. It was 152-2 with the o/u filter, I posted the game breakdowns also.
2009 AL with O/U filter
ML Record 88-1
Game 1 = 58-31, 65.2%
Game 2 = 21-10, 67.7%
Game 3 = 9-1, 90%
RL record for all games regardless of odds = 85-4
Game 1 = 45-44, 50.6%
Game 2 = 24-20, 54.5%
Game 3 = 16-4, 80%
Here it is CS. I will figure out the same with just playing home teams
2009 AL with O/U filter
ML Record 88-1
Game 1 = 58-31, 65.2%
Game 2 = 21-10, 67.7%
Game 3 = 9-1, 90%
RL record for all games regardless of odds = 85-4
Game 1 = 45-44, 50.6%
Game 2 = 24-20, 54.5%
Game 3 = 16-4, 80%
Here it is CS. I will figure out the same with just playing home teams
NL 2009 with 9+ O/U filter
ML record = 63-1
Game 1 = 51-13, 79.7% ---- holy schnikes!
Game 2 = 9-4, 69.2%
Game 3 = 3-1, 75%
Runline record for all 3 games regardless of odds = 60-4
Game 1 = 37-27, 57.8%
Game 2 = 16-11, 59.3%
Game 3 = 7-4, 63.6%
NL 2009 with 9+ O/U filter
ML record = 63-1
Game 1 = 51-13, 79.7% ---- holy schnikes!
Game 2 = 9-4, 69.2%
Game 3 = 3-1, 75%
Runline record for all 3 games regardless of odds = 60-4
Game 1 = 37-27, 57.8%
Game 2 = 16-11, 59.3%
Game 3 = 7-4, 63.6%
Eliminating road teams doesn't change things much with the filter and didn't elminate any losses
For AL -7 G1's, -3 G2's, and -2 G3's
For NL: -3 G1's, -1 G2's
Eliminating road teams doesn't change things much with the filter and didn't elminate any losses
For AL -7 G1's, -3 G2's, and -2 G3's
For NL: -3 G1's, -1 G2's
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.