Hopefully TB and NYY gives us our units back tomorrow .
Want to at least mention my sweep chase system in here. Don't know if anyone has been looking in on it or not since we had an unbelievably bad run in it. Just wanted to point out that it has gone 28-0 over the last few weeks with only one game 3 I can remember. The game 1's went 6-1 tonight with two dog wins with NYM and LA angels. It also hit on a double play with DET. Can't in good conscience tell people to jump back on it but you may want to at least take a peak at it from time to time...
0
Hopefully TB and NYY gives us our units back tomorrow .
Want to at least mention my sweep chase system in here. Don't know if anyone has been looking in on it or not since we had an unbelievably bad run in it. Just wanted to point out that it has gone 28-0 over the last few weeks with only one game 3 I can remember. The game 1's went 6-1 tonight with two dog wins with NYM and LA angels. It also hit on a double play with DET. Can't in good conscience tell people to jump back on it but you may want to at least take a peak at it from time to time...
Rizz - wouldn't these games still marginally helped the labby lines? It appears you would have gone 4-5 for all the picks.
In theory the more you put in the more it can spit back to you. Having two series go to game 3 and one losing would have left a lot on our line 2 and 3.... Overall, I think we would be up less units for the weekend then we were without them. As long as you are working your lines you should be able to get it back but you will be playing larger wagers to get there. To each their own, but from a system standpoint, I will continue to exclude them as their may still be some people using martingale (although, I hope everyone has switched over to the aggressive labby)
0
Quote Originally Posted by scotth69:
Rizz - wouldn't these games still marginally helped the labby lines? It appears you would have gone 4-5 for all the picks.
In theory the more you put in the more it can spit back to you. Having two series go to game 3 and one losing would have left a lot on our line 2 and 3.... Overall, I think we would be up less units for the weekend then we were without them. As long as you are working your lines you should be able to get it back but you will be playing larger wagers to get there. To each their own, but from a system standpoint, I will continue to exclude them as their may still be some people using martingale (although, I hope everyone has switched over to the aggressive labby)
So therizz, To Avoid Another Mistake Like The Mil/Laa Game Back On June 15. With The Yankees/Diamondbacks Game For Today, The Line Dropped At -160 From -170 At My Sportsbook. It Opened Higher Than -150. So, Are They Still Considered A Play?
0
So therizz, To Avoid Another Mistake Like The Mil/Laa Game Back On June 15. With The Yankees/Diamondbacks Game For Today, The Line Dropped At -160 From -170 At My Sportsbook. It Opened Higher Than -150. So, Are They Still Considered A Play?
So therizz, To Avoid Another Mistake Like The Mil/Laa Game Back On June 15. With The Yankees/Diamondbacks Game For Today, The Line Dropped At -160 From -170 At My Sportsbook. It Opened Higher Than -150. So, Are They Still Considered A Play?
In backtesting for the IL games I looked at series that closed at -150 or higher. NYY are still a play. I missed the closing line on WAS. Will still follow it as a play as I already played it, posted it, never changed anything before the first pitch, plus they opened -145 or higher which was consistent with regular plays. Hopefully they get back on track this series
0
Quote Originally Posted by jaybosstein:
So therizz, To Avoid Another Mistake Like The Mil/Laa Game Back On June 15. With The Yankees/Diamondbacks Game For Today, The Line Dropped At -160 From -170 At My Sportsbook. It Opened Higher Than -150. So, Are They Still Considered A Play?
In backtesting for the IL games I looked at series that closed at -150 or higher. NYY are still a play. I missed the closing line on WAS. Will still follow it as a play as I already played it, posted it, never changed anything before the first pitch, plus they opened -145 or higher which was consistent with regular plays. Hopefully they get back on track this series
In backtesting for the IL games I looked at series that closed at -150 or higher. NYY are still a play. I missed the closing line on WAS. Will still follow it as a play as I already played it, posted it, never changed anything before the first pitch, plus they opened -145 or higher which was consistent with regular plays. Hopefully they get back on track this series
Just Checking. Thank You Sir
0
Quote Originally Posted by therizz:
In backtesting for the IL games I looked at series that closed at -150 or higher. NYY are still a play. I missed the closing line on WAS. Will still follow it as a play as I already played it, posted it, never changed anything before the first pitch, plus they opened -145 or higher which was consistent with regular plays. Hopefully they get back on track this series
I Knew It rizz!!! Something Was Just Bothering Me About Yesterdays Game Between Yankees/Diamondbacks. And My Instincts Was Right On The Money, Diamondbacks Blew They Ass Out! That Line Dropped For A Reason & That Happened To Be The Reason. But Today, They Have A Better Pitcher Than Burnett, His Stats Was A Lil' Suspect Anyways. So, Do They Qualify For The o/u 9.5 Filter For Today?
0
I Knew It rizz!!! Something Was Just Bothering Me About Yesterdays Game Between Yankees/Diamondbacks. And My Instincts Was Right On The Money, Diamondbacks Blew They Ass Out! That Line Dropped For A Reason & That Happened To Be The Reason. But Today, They Have A Better Pitcher Than Burnett, His Stats Was A Lil' Suspect Anyways. So, Do They Qualify For The o/u 9.5 Filter For Today?
I Knew It rizz!!! Something Was Just Bothering Me About Yesterdays Game Between Yankees/Diamondbacks. And My Instincts Was Right On The Money, Diamondbacks Blew They Ass Out! That Line Dropped For A Reason & That Happened To Be The Reason. But Today, They Have A Better Pitcher Than Burnett, His Stats Was A Lil' Suspect Anyways. So, Do They Qualify For The o/u 9.5 Filter For Today?
Jay,
once the series starts and passes the requirement for the first game we keep playing them for that series regardless of lines or over/under in the subsequent games. I agree about the line drops. Anytime the public is on a team heavy and the line drops significantly it definitely worries me.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jaybosstein:
I Knew It rizz!!! Something Was Just Bothering Me About Yesterdays Game Between Yankees/Diamondbacks. And My Instincts Was Right On The Money, Diamondbacks Blew They Ass Out! That Line Dropped For A Reason & That Happened To Be The Reason. But Today, They Have A Better Pitcher Than Burnett, His Stats Was A Lil' Suspect Anyways. So, Do They Qualify For The o/u 9.5 Filter For Today?
Jay,
once the series starts and passes the requirement for the first game we keep playing them for that series regardless of lines or over/under in the subsequent games. I agree about the line drops. Anytime the public is on a team heavy and the line drops significantly it definitely worries me.
Don't know how to post this the best way, but I noticed the thread has gotten close to 30,00 views.... Just curious as to how many people are playing the system, when they started, whether they are following the labby lines, and how they are doing overall. Really hoping people have benefited from this. I realize a fair amount of people may be making the plays on their own and not checking the thread regularly but just thought I would post out of curiosity.
0
Don't know how to post this the best way, but I noticed the thread has gotten close to 30,00 views.... Just curious as to how many people are playing the system, when they started, whether they are following the labby lines, and how they are doing overall. Really hoping people have benefited from this. I realize a fair amount of people may be making the plays on their own and not checking the thread regularly but just thought I would post out of curiosity.
I got your system down but still check in daily to double check the filters. I learned the labby system from this thread and stopped using martingale. I play your Opening Line sytem, JM V1,2,3 and Smitter's 1st Inning system. You should check out Smitter's new strategy. It is a money maker for sure. Thanks for all the hard work posting daily.
0
I got your system down but still check in daily to double check the filters. I learned the labby system from this thread and stopped using martingale. I play your Opening Line sytem, JM V1,2,3 and Smitter's 1st Inning system. You should check out Smitter's new strategy. It is a money maker for sure. Thanks for all the hard work posting daily.
Copyright � 1995 - 2024
CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
.
Hot Forum Topics
