Great work!! Did u by any chance run the numbers using the RL for all plays?
Thanks
I didn't but it would be pretty easy for me to go back through it. Will try to post this info tonight
Great work!! Did u by any chance run the numbers using the RL for all plays?
Thanks
I didn't but it would be pretty easy for me to go back through it. Will try to post this info tonight
Okay this was pretty easy to figure out. So playing RL for ALL games adds 17 losses:
242-26
only playing RL above -190 adds 5 losses = 254-14
Playing RL on ALL games reg. of odds adds 15 game 2's, and 13 game 3 wins
Okay this was pretty easy to figure out. So playing RL for ALL games adds 17 losses:
242-26
only playing RL above -190 adds 5 losses = 254-14
Playing RL on ALL games reg. of odds adds 15 game 2's, and 13 game 3 wins
yep for the hell of it i played Mil, thinking might as well go down with the ship....lol
Rizz:
Just to clarify when you say all plays, is that at -1.5 rl with odds starting at -150? or is that all fav down to -101 on up?
yep for the hell of it i played Mil, thinking might as well go down with the ship....lol
Rizz:
Just to clarify when you say all plays, is that at -1.5 rl with odds starting at -150? or is that all fav down to -101 on up?
Jake,
Those numbers are playing ML regardless of odds, even if the team is a dog. Most of those losses are in series that start at -145- 155. I would not recommend playing those on the RL unless you feel extremely strongly about it. GL with MIL today
Revguy,
we should have some more series starting tomorrow. I have 3 or 4 starting tomorrow in my other system as well.
Jake,
Those numbers are playing ML regardless of odds, even if the team is a dog. Most of those losses are in series that start at -145- 155. I would not recommend playing those on the RL unless you feel extremely strongly about it. GL with MIL today
Revguy,
we should have some more series starting tomorrow. I have 3 or 4 starting tomorrow in my other system as well.
Ok you confused me a bit with your last post. When you have a record of :
Playing ALL games on RL regardless of odds:
242-26
You do mean betting on a team that has first game of series odds of -145/-150 or more right? Then you keep chasing until a win betting the RL regarless of odds of game 2 and game 3. Is this correct?
Thanks
Ok you confused me a bit with your last post. When you have a record of :
Playing ALL games on RL regardless of odds:
242-26
You do mean betting on a team that has first game of series odds of -145/-150 or more right? Then you keep chasing until a win betting the RL regarless of odds of game 2 and game 3. Is this correct?
Thanks
Rizz:
Thanks for the help. last questions, do know if this question has been asked. lets say team A, the first game in the series is -200 ml and bet the rl.
This first bet loses and then the next game for team A the -140ml?
question do the numbers support play the ml for this game or play the RL?
If this middle play loses and the last game in the series, the ml is -180 or less do the numbers support playing the ml?
Guess what I am trying to determine when is the best time to play the ml versus the rl after the first bet loses, based on 2nd and 3rd game odds.
if it is still possible to get a copy of the database you were offering?
Rizz:
Thanks for the help. last questions, do know if this question has been asked. lets say team A, the first game in the series is -200 ml and bet the rl.
This first bet loses and then the next game for team A the -140ml?
question do the numbers support play the ml for this game or play the RL?
If this middle play loses and the last game in the series, the ml is -180 or less do the numbers support playing the ml?
Guess what I am trying to determine when is the best time to play the ml versus the rl after the first bet loses, based on 2nd and 3rd game odds.
if it is still possible to get a copy of the database you were offering?
Jake,
Those numbers are playing ML regardless of odds, even if the team is a dog. Most of those losses are in series that start at -145- 155. I would not recommend playing those on the RL unless you feel extremely strongly about it. GL with MIL today
Revguy,
we should have some more series starting tomorrow. I have 3 or 4 starting tomorrow in my other system as well.
I didnt know you were running 2 systems i will be ready for the new stuff
Jake,
Those numbers are playing ML regardless of odds, even if the team is a dog. Most of those losses are in series that start at -145- 155. I would not recommend playing those on the RL unless you feel extremely strongly about it. GL with MIL today
Revguy,
we should have some more series starting tomorrow. I have 3 or 4 starting tomorrow in my other system as well.
I didnt know you were running 2 systems i will be ready for the new stuff
Ok you confused me a bit with your last post. When you have a record of :
Playing ALL games on RL regardless of odds:
242-26
You do mean betting on a team that has first game of series odds of -145/-150 or more right? Then you keep chasing until a win betting the RL regarless of odds of game 2 and game 3. Is this correct?
Thanks
Right. The first game makes it become a play based on the odds. Then I would chase all three games on the RL for that record even if the odds were even or I was betting on a dog. This is how I was first looking into playing this, then I saw the ML numbers were significantly better. A few pages back I posted all the record for 2007-9 by playing this system just on the ML, ML + playing RL for any game greater than -190 (most years adds 2 or 3 series losses, but less juice), or playing every game on the RL regardless of odds. I keep the record based on the ML plays. I think thus far all series would have covered on the RL unless STL loses tonight. I just want to give everyone the most info possible so they can play whatever method they feel most comfortable. Personally, I play ML on 150 to 170, then I split money on ML and RL 170-190, and RL if it is higher than 190. If a series goes off higher than 190 I keep posting the plays for the RL plays but count the win when the series hits on ML. Sorry for the delayed response had to clean my deck.
Ok you confused me a bit with your last post. When you have a record of :
Playing ALL games on RL regardless of odds:
242-26
You do mean betting on a team that has first game of series odds of -145/-150 or more right? Then you keep chasing until a win betting the RL regarless of odds of game 2 and game 3. Is this correct?
Thanks
Right. The first game makes it become a play based on the odds. Then I would chase all three games on the RL for that record even if the odds were even or I was betting on a dog. This is how I was first looking into playing this, then I saw the ML numbers were significantly better. A few pages back I posted all the record for 2007-9 by playing this system just on the ML, ML + playing RL for any game greater than -190 (most years adds 2 or 3 series losses, but less juice), or playing every game on the RL regardless of odds. I keep the record based on the ML plays. I think thus far all series would have covered on the RL unless STL loses tonight. I just want to give everyone the most info possible so they can play whatever method they feel most comfortable. Personally, I play ML on 150 to 170, then I split money on ML and RL 170-190, and RL if it is higher than 190. If a series goes off higher than 190 I keep posting the plays for the RL plays but count the win when the series hits on ML. Sorry for the delayed response had to clean my deck.
Rizz:
Thanks for the help. last questions, do know if this question has been asked. lets say team A, the first game in the series is -200 ml and bet the rl.
This first bet loses and then the next game for team A the -140ml?
question do the numbers support play the ml for this game or play the RL?
If this middle play loses and the last game in the series, the ml is -180 or less do the numbers support playing the ml?
Guess what I am trying to determine when is the best time to play the ml versus the rl after the first bet loses, based on 2nd and 3rd game odds.
if it is still possible to get a copy of the database you were offering?
Jake a few pages back I put a summary up of all the data for last three seasons. A series like this would fall into the -190 criteria. So playing all series like this with RL for game 1, then ML for any series game better than -190 would add about 2-3 series losses per year but will be significantly decreasing your juice. Personally I would likely play a series like that on RL for game 1, then ML for game 2. I am also using a three line labby system for all my plays to mitigate losses.
Rizz:
Thanks for the help. last questions, do know if this question has been asked. lets say team A, the first game in the series is -200 ml and bet the rl.
This first bet loses and then the next game for team A the -140ml?
question do the numbers support play the ml for this game or play the RL?
If this middle play loses and the last game in the series, the ml is -180 or less do the numbers support playing the ml?
Guess what I am trying to determine when is the best time to play the ml versus the rl after the first bet loses, based on 2nd and 3rd game odds.
if it is still possible to get a copy of the database you were offering?
Jake a few pages back I put a summary up of all the data for last three seasons. A series like this would fall into the -190 criteria. So playing all series like this with RL for game 1, then ML for any series game better than -190 would add about 2-3 series losses per year but will be significantly decreasing your juice. Personally I would likely play a series like that on RL for game 1, then ML for game 2. I am also using a three line labby system for all my plays to mitigate losses.
Results for 4/18:
System record 15-0-1
Additional series 3-0-0
Series #18 (game 3 wins) MIL
***Series #19 (game 3) 8:05 nym @ STL -265, RL pending
BOL
Game 1 wins =13
Game 2 wins = 1
Game 3 wins = 1
**STL line only included to follow for those that played them on RL, has already been included as a system win***
Results for 4/18:
System record 15-0-1
Additional series 3-0-0
Series #18 (game 3 wins) MIL
***Series #19 (game 3) 8:05 nym @ STL -265, RL pending
BOL
Game 1 wins =13
Game 2 wins = 1
Game 3 wins = 1
**STL line only included to follow for those that played them on RL, has already been included as a system win***
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.