All Forums | Systems & Strategies

Second game of 2 game NFL Road Trip 2010

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 77917
Posts: 272
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 1506
Posted: #76
at a quick glance, looks like the eagles are the only play this week. the saints did'nt cover last week, but they are on a 3 game in a row road trip........
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 423
Posted: #77
some ugly plays this week. Looks like: St Louis, Indy, and Houston....can someone doublecheck? Thanks.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 909
Posted: #78
All 3 of those should be plays. I did not double check the rest of the teams.
I personally will not be betting on STL. Like Oak in the MLB they do not care for our systems (this yr).
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 1506
Posted: #79

Hey Stick, the plays are Houston and St. Louis. Indy is not a play, as they are in the middle of a three game road trip. GL.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2011
Posts: 327
Posted: #80
in week 4 the jets were in the middle of a 3-game road trip.  so if we eliminate teams on a 3-game road trip, this system is 6-5 ATS for this season.

it looks like SD -3.5 and WAS +4.5 are the plays next week.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 1506
Posted: #81
hey DJ, are you sure it's only 6-5 this year?? Seems like its been a bit better than that, but i could be wrong. San Diego is a play, but not sure about the Skins as they play Buf at a neutral site?? Does that constitute a "road" game??
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2011
Posts: 327
Posted: #82

Week 2 - SEA +14

Week 3 - BAL-5, JAC+3.5, KC+15, GB-4

Week 4 - NE-4.5, ATL-4, PIT+3.5

Week 5 - NONE

Week 6 - PHI -3

Week 7 - STL +14, HOU+3

Week 8 - WAS +4, SD -3

6-7 ATS YTD

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 1175
Posted: #83
If anybody's interested 2011 finished the season at 16-12 for a 57% win rate. I think that's in line with all the previous years.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2001
Posts: 845
Posted: #84
This week:

Detroit
KC

Good Luck.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 2251
Posted: #85
All about the chase
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 2251
Posted: #86
Dan, im trying to get greedy here but ever looked at how they would look as two team teasers?? Don't know if someone has done that but maybe something to keep track of.

Detroit (+2.5)
K.C. (+14.5)

All about the chase
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 1175
Posted: #87
NYJ also this week
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 95
Posted: #88
Has anyone come up with some common denominators to filter out some of the losers?
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 650
Posted: #89

hardy this is on my list to try and get it hitting over 90% after im done with what im working on now this is top priority

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 650
Posted: #90

havent looked back yet at all but what if you start with the obvious and only play teams who have a better record than the team they are against

that would eliminate all this week plays tho right?

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 650
Posted: #91

ok so i moved this up in priority and heres what i found, i only backchecked the plays that kirby posted.

Road team favs with better record or equal records over .500 are 3-1 ATS

Home team with better record or equal records under .500 are 4-2 ATS

that gives us a record of 7-3 vs the old record of 6-7

ALSO

unders in these games hit at 10-3, if the road team is the underdog they are 6-1, if the road team is the underdog and the total is 43 or less they are 3-0

heres the plays i like using these trends:

DET -3.5

NO -9

KC/NO UNDER 53

JETS ARE A NO PLAY FOR ME

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 1175
Posted: #92
Quote Originally Posted by Burly:

ok so i moved this up in priority and heres what i found, i only backchecked the plays that kirby posted.

Road team favs with better record or equal records over .500 are 3-1 ATS

Home team with better record or equal records under .500 are 4-2 ATS

that gives us a record of 7-3 vs the old record of 6-7

ALSO

unders in these games hit at 10-3, if the road team is the underdog they are 6-1, if the road team is the underdog and the total is 43 or less they are 3-0

heres the plays i like using these trends:

DET -3.5

NO -9

KC/NO UNDER 53

JETS ARE A NO PLAY FOR ME


It's should be interesting. I'll play 'em.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 650
Posted: #93

kirby im looking back at the 2010 plays that are posted, can you post the rest of the plays from 2011?

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 1175
Posted: #94

If you're talking about the plays that finished off the year after they stopped posting them on this thread they were:

Week 9  CLE +10.5 lost 12-30 to HOU                                 

Week 10 STL+2.5 beat CLE 13-12

Week 11 BUF+3 lost to MIA 8-35

Week 12 ARI +1 beat STL 23-20  BUF +9.5 lost to NYJ 24-28 CAR -3.5 beat IND 27-19

Week 14 STL +9 lost to SEA 13-30 OAK +11.5 lost to GB 16-46 ATL -3 beat CAR 31-23 PHI +3 beat MIA 26-10

Week 15 NE -7 beat DEN 41-23

Week 16 JAC +8.5 lost to TEN 16-23

Week 17 TB +10 lost to ATL 24-45 SD +2.5 beat OAK 38-26 CHI +1.5 beat MIN 17-13

Last 15 games of the season 10-5

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 650
Posted: #95

thanks kirby

as you can tell i need to back check more as all my posted plays were wrong!!

really sorry to anyone who followed them wont post anymore plays until back check is all done

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 650
Posted: #96

ok so now i guess i got the under correct!

 

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2001
Posts: 845
Posted: #97
2-1 or 1-1-1 depending on the Jet's number.

This week: SF

Good Luck.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 2251
Posted: #98
Quote Originally Posted by jaime2309:

Dan, im trying to get greedy here but ever looked at how they would look as two team teasers?? Don't know if someone has done that but maybe something to keep track of.

Detroit (+2.5)
K.C. (+14.5)




When I first posted this, i thought it was only going to be two teams, but since it was three, we could've done a three team teaset (10 pts), which would have looked like this:

Detroit( +3.5)
KC (+19)
Jets (+9)

1-0 on teasers

Since this week, we only have SF, no teaser will be in play.
All about the chase
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 1175
Posted: #99
SF winner makes it 3-1 this year under the original premise.
 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2001
Posts: 845
Posted: #100
Seattle and TN on tap for this week. If Chicago doesn't cover Monday night, they will be a play.

Good Luck.
All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.