How did system win last year when they were a pathetic +1.562? The turnovers were decent but they need to be +45 or more yards ahead, on average for each opponent through 16weeks. Confused on that
0
How did system win last year when they were a pathetic +1.562? The turnovers were decent but they need to be +45 or more yards ahead, on average for each opponent through 16weeks. Confused on that
I ran the numbers through Week 16 and here are the results. Note I only listed teams in the +yds because they are the only teams with a shot. I showed KC because their defense is leading in some defensive categories:
Super Bowl 2014
===
AFC
===
DENVER:
Yards vs opponent average: +94.7yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
SOS Ranking: 32/32 .430%
Fumble Recovery's: 8
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (-1)
CINCINNATI:
Yards vs opponent average: +55.7yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 5
SOS Ranking: 12/32 .508%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+2)
NEW ENGLAND:
Yards vs opponent average: +13yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
SOS Ranking: 14/32 .508%
Fumble Recovery's: 12
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+10)
KANSAS CITY:
Yards vs opponent average: -27.6yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 7
SOS Ranking: 28/32 .473%
Fumble Recovery's: 15
Interceptions: 20
Turnover +/-: (+17)
SAN DIEGO:
Yards vs opponent average: +23.6
Defensive Touchdowns: 1
SOS Ranking: 31/32 .457%
Fumble Recovery's: 6
Interceptions: 11
Turnover +/-: (-3)
====
NFC - (+35yd avg to qualify)
====
NEW ORLEANS:
Yards vs opponent average: +88.2yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 0
SOS Ranking: 3/32 .539%
Fumble Recovery's: 7
Interceptions: 11
Turnover +/-: (-1)
PHILADELPHIA:
Yards vs opponent average: +28.2yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 2
SOS Ranking: 20/32 .496%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+10)
ARIZONA:
Yards vs opponent average: +24yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 5
SOS Ranking: 7/32 .520%
Fumble Recovery's: 10
Interceptions: 20
Turnover +/-: (+1)
SEATTLE:
Yards vs opponent average: +17.1yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
SOS Ranking: 11/32 .516%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 26
Turnover +/-: (+18)
SAN FRANCISCO:
Yards vs opponent average: +14.4yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 5
SOS Ranking: 9/32 .520%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+10)
CAROLINA:
Yards vs opponent average: +17.5yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
SOS Ranking: 1/32 .543
Fumble Recovery's: 10
Interceptions: 19
Turnover +/-: (+12)
0
I ran the numbers through Week 16 and here are the results. Note I only listed teams in the +yds because they are the only teams with a shot. I showed KC because their defense is leading in some defensive categories:
Ill just pick up this thread to see how it does since I'm tracking it now lol. I love to handicap games so I will provid good opinion and summaries when the season wraps up. Together, I'm sure we can predict which two teams will for sure be in the SB for 2014! Update to come.....
0
Ill just pick up this thread to see how it does since I'm tracking it now lol. I love to handicap games so I will provid good opinion and summaries when the season wraps up. Together, I'm sure we can predict which two teams will for sure be in the SB for 2014! Update to come.....
I ran the numbers through Week 16 and here are the results. Note I only listed teams in the +yds because they are the only teams with a shot. I showed KC because their defense is leading in some defensive categories:
Super Bowl 2014
===
AFC
===
DENVER:
Yards vs opponent average: +94.7yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
SOS Ranking: 32/32 .430%
Fumble Recovery's: 8
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (-1)
CINCINNATI:
Yards vs opponent average: +55.7yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 5
SOS Ranking: 12/32 .508%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+2)
NEW ENGLAND:
Yards vs opponent average: +13yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
SOS Ranking: 14/32 .508%
Fumble Recovery's: 12
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+10)
KANSAS CITY:
Yards vs opponent average: -27.6yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 7
SOS Ranking: 28/32 .473%
Fumble Recovery's: 15
Interceptions: 20
Turnover +/-: (+17)
SAN DIEGO:
Yards vs opponent average: +23.6
Defensive Touchdowns: 1
SOS Ranking: 31/32 .457%
Fumble Recovery's: 6
Interceptions: 11
Turnover +/-: (-3)
====
NFC - (+35yd avg to qualify)
====
NEW ORLEANS:
Yards vs opponent average: +88.2yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 0
SOS Ranking: 3/32 .539%
Fumble Recovery's: 7
Interceptions: 11
Turnover +/-: (-1)
PHILADELPHIA:
Yards vs opponent average: +28.2yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 2
SOS Ranking: 20/32 .496%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+10)
ARIZONA:
Yards vs opponent average: +24yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 5
SOS Ranking: 7/32 .520%
Fumble Recovery's: 10
Interceptions: 20
Turnover +/-: (+1)
SEATTLE:
Yards vs opponent average: +17.1yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
SOS Ranking: 11/32 .516%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 26
Turnover +/-: (+18)
SAN FRANCISCO:
Yards vs opponent average: +14.4yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 5
SOS Ranking: 9/32 .520%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+10)
CAROLINA:
Yards vs opponent average: +17.5yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
SOS Ranking: 1/32 .543
Fumble Recovery's: 10
Interceptions: 19
Turnover +/-: (+12)
Do you have updated numbers ??? TIA
0
Quote Originally Posted by Deano-:
I ran the numbers through Week 16 and here are the results. Note I only listed teams in the +yds because they are the only teams with a shot. I showed KC because their defense is leading in some defensive categories:
Only thing that concerns me is last years results. No one has chimed in to verify why Balt was the play last year. They were only 1yd better than their opponents??? I'm going to analyze each team and make logical decisions based on the systems parameters...
0
Only thing that concerns me is last years results. No one has chimed in to verify why Balt was the play last year. They were only 1yd better than their opponents??? I'm going to analyze each team and make logical decisions based on the systems parameters...
Of those that are +35yds, only Cincinnati has a + TO ratio. That doesn't mean I would pick them at all. I don't see how you can bet against Seattle to win it all, based on these numbers.
Would you pick Denver or New Orleans based on their offensive numbers...and terrible defense? I wouldn't.
I will be awaiting the updated numbers to see if anything stands out, but as of now my picks are Denver/Cincinatti and Seattle/Green Bay.
0
Of those that are +35yds, only Cincinnati has a + TO ratio. That doesn't mean I would pick them at all. I don't see how you can bet against Seattle to win it all, based on these numbers.
Would you pick Denver or New Orleans based on their offensive numbers...and terrible defense? I wouldn't.
I will be awaiting the updated numbers to see if anything stands out, but as of now my picks are Denver/Cincinatti and Seattle/Green Bay.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
