All Forums | Systems & Strategies

Therizz's NHL Opening Game Fav 2013-14

Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 50541
Posts: 533
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 6906
Posted: #526
Monday results: La loses on the C game.

Tuesday: No games qualify
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 5921
Posted: #527

Looking back over the results from when I was out is ugly. Way too many losses on this system. I think at this point we call it and save bankroll for baseball.

If anyone wants the possible remaining plays for the season let me know and I will post them on here, but I'm personally done with this system.

Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 538
Posted: #528
I've personally been chasing teams that have a winning percentage of over .530 and are starting a home stand. Basically this system but ignoring the -130 rule. It's still ugly, but not as bad. The breakdown:

53-5
A. 42-16
B. 10-6
C. 1-5

As you can see, the winning percentage is actually pretty good. The C games are what's holding it back - but those are bound to catch up soon.

If like the plays for the rest of the year if you don't mind Dan.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 5921
Posted: #529

Here you go. If more than 3 games, I will note for any double dip opportunities.

  • Chicago 3/21, 3 games (this is a double dip)
  • Pitt 3/22, 4 games
  • Calgary 3/24
  • Van 3/25, 5 games
  • Florida 3/25
  • STL 3/27, 5 games
  • Ottawa 3/28 5 games
  • Toronto 3/29, 4 games
  • LA 3/29
  • Detroit 3/30
  • Anaheim 3/31
  • Tampa 4/1, 6 games
  • SJ 4/1
  • Florida 4/4, 5 games
  • Columbus 4/4
  • NYR 4/5
  • Edm 4/6, 4 games
  • Minn 4/8
  • Pitt 4/9

Good luck.

Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 528
Posted: #530
Hey Beefman I've been doing something very similar. Just curious, have you been using form as a filter ? Example home team must have min 6w of L10 ?

I like the look of ur results.

Results have been tough lately..
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 538
Posted: #531
Quote Originally Posted by Goodsy:

Hey Beefman I've been doing something very similar. Just curious, have you been using form as a filter ? Example home team must have min 6w of L10 ?

I like the look of ur results.

Results have been tough lately..

No, I haven't looked at last 10. I started using labby lines after break so I'm about break even since then. 

The only concern I have is that I follow the John Morrison system (which tails teams on a road trip)  using this filter as well and it's at 64-2. I'm thinking that road teams may have the edge in NHL, so it makes no sense to chase home teams. The A game win percentage has been doing so well on the home system though that I'm not sure. 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 528
Posted: #532
Quote Originally Posted by TheBeefMan:


No, I haven't looked at last 10. I started using labby lines after break so I'm about break even since then. 

The only concern I have is that I follow the John Morrison system (which tails teams on a road trip)  using this filter as well and it's at 64-2. I'm thinking that road teams may have the edge in NHL, so it makes no sense to chase home teams. The A game win percentage has been doing so well on the home system though that I'm not sure. 

I got tired of the juice and switched from ML to regulation win... you will get the extra ABorC loss.. but overall it has been working out better with the friendlier odds.. 

I just figured that a loss is a loss ML or regulation.. when I go to OT I often lose anyways.. so got jack of it and just started on the regulation win.. I labby it as well, mix of aggressive and standard..the more favourable odds I come out ahead.

I feel more comfortable with homes teams.. 

I bet on strong home teams and fade weak away teams. 

Ducks have been pissing me off lately with 2 series (3 games each) home losses just before and after break.
 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 5921
Posted: #533
Quote Originally Posted by Danrules24:

Here you go. If more than 3 games, I will note for any double dip opportunities.

  • Chicago 3/21, 3 games (this is a double dip)
  • Pitt 3/22, 4 games
  • Calgary 3/24
  • Van 3/25, 5 games
  • Florida 3/25
  • STL 3/27, 5 games
  • Ottawa 3/28 5 games
  • Toronto 3/29, 4 games
  • LA 3/29
  • Detroit 3/30
  • Anaheim 3/31
  • Tampa 4/1, 6 games
  • SJ 4/1
  • Florida 4/4, 5 games
  • Columbus 4/4
  • NYR 4/5
  • Edm 4/6, 4 games
  • Minn 4/8
  • Pitt 4/9

Good luck.

For those still following this, I made an error on the above post. Van on 3/25 should have been 3/29, 5 game homestand.

Chicago won on the double dip A game and were done. Pitt won on the A game on 3/22, did not qualify for double dip. Cgy and Fla did not qualify for their games, which brings us to STL today.

Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.