Both these are fade plays. Sandgren’s return game is lost. Hoping Kohlschreiber’s aging weapons are diminished enough that facing the lefty will be too difficult to keep up on the weak side.
Short Parlay @ 2.613
Milman -3.5
Gerasimov/Pospisil O 22
GL all
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Fratangelo ML @ 2.230
Bolt ML @ 2.630
Both these are fade plays. Sandgren’s return game is lost. Hoping Kohlschreiber’s aging weapons are diminished enough that facing the lefty will be too difficult to keep up on the weak side.
All he needed was to hold two service games. He was rolling too. Then he just started hitting the ball nicely to Kohl. Or like a foot wide the doubles court.
I put a steam bet on Millman to win -4.0. I already have him in a parlay but I can’t see him doing anything short of embarrassing Holt.
0
All he needed was to hold two service games. He was rolling too. Then he just started hitting the ball nicely to Kohl. Or like a foot wide the doubles court.
I put a steam bet on Millman to win -4.0. I already have him in a parlay but I can’t see him doing anything short of embarrassing Holt.
@AverageAllstar Be careful taking the top seeds in qualifying. Millman and Sousa might tank coz they'll get in as lucky loser. Good luck.
this is a really good point! I lost on Paolini a couple of weeks ago in a qualifier she should definitely win. But you could see she didn’t run for all the balls. Instead she was in main draw as a lucky loser and even got a better draw then if she would have won that qualifier match.
1
Quote Originally Posted by mick536:
@AverageAllstar Be careful taking the top seeds in qualifying. Millman and Sousa might tank coz they'll get in as lucky loser. Good luck.
this is a really good point! I lost on Paolini a couple of weeks ago in a qualifier she should definitely win. But you could see she didn’t run for all the balls. Instead she was in main draw as a lucky loser and even got a better draw then if she would have won that qualifier match.
I don’t know if they’d do that at a Masters or Major event. A guy like Kyrgios might, but the rest of the grinders wouldn’t leave that outcome to chance.
I tend to stay away from Qualies, but I’ll look for that down the road.
0
@mick536
I don’t know if they’d do that at a Masters or Major event. A guy like Kyrgios might, but the rest of the grinders wouldn’t leave that outcome to chance.
I tend to stay away from Qualies, but I’ll look for that down the road.
Looks like a trap line here. Wolf doesn’t have a good track record against lefties. Maybe it has to do with Gaston’s having a hard time getting out of the 1st round this year but he’s had stiff competition. Gaston just needs to keep his 1st serves in and he should be fine.
0
Adding:
Gaston ML @ 2.600
Looks like a trap line here. Wolf doesn’t have a good track record against lefties. Maybe it has to do with Gaston’s having a hard time getting out of the 1st round this year but he’s had stiff competition. Gaston just needs to keep his 1st serves in and he should be fine.
Ajax - 2? Cambuur have only lost once by 3 or more goals last calender year, and h2h only once to Ajax last 23 years at home. They play on artificial grass which isn't preferred by such big teams which have professional technical players
0
Ajax - 2? Cambuur have only lost once by 3 or more goals last calender year, and h2h only once to Ajax last 23 years at home. They play on artificial grass which isn't preferred by such big teams which have professional technical players
Also Ajax have a big confrontation coming up in 4days in the champions league against benfica which has their priority, I know you're a truly good capper but I think tonight their is a lot of other facts to be taken in consideration for the Ajax bet
1
Also Ajax have a big confrontation coming up in 4days in the champions league against benfica which has their priority, I know you're a truly good capper but I think tonight their is a lot of other facts to be taken in consideration for the Ajax bet
You’re totally right that there’s more to consider than what happened last game or stats. And sometimes it only takes one of those odd considerations to sway a decision. At the end of the day it’s a monstrous organization and even on their bad days (unarmed days) they’re still good.
Them in an insignificant game is why I bought a goal and a half in that Parlay. Their line is 3.5 Goals.
I hope your wrong, but for sure you could be right in I’m over estimating their team.
0
@Skill-token
You’re totally right that there’s more to consider than what happened last game or stats. And sometimes it only takes one of those odd considerations to sway a decision. At the end of the day it’s a monstrous organization and even on their bad days (unarmed days) they’re still good.
Them in an insignificant game is why I bought a goal and a half in that Parlay. Their line is 3.5 Goals.
I hope your wrong, but for sure you could be right in I’m over estimating their team.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.