Quote Originally Posted by wgomel21: Quote Originally Posted by wgomel21: Early Hoops Purdue/ High Point Over 153.5 Montana +17 0-2 Grizzlies shoot two air balls to miss the cover. Tonight's plays Drake +6.5 POD Pigs +5.5 UC San Diego +2.5 Pigs
Drake
0
Quote Originally Posted by wgomel21:
Quote Originally Posted by wgomel21: Quote Originally Posted by wgomel21: Early Hoops Purdue/ High Point Over 153.5 Montana +17 0-2 Grizzlies shoot two air balls to miss the cover. Tonight's plays Drake +6.5 POD Pigs +5.5 UC San Diego +2.5 Pigs
Yesterday 8 of the 16 seeded players lost their opening match. Their opponents were all either underdogs or pickems. There were the 4 I bet: Townsend, Fruhvirtova, Ruse & Baptiste. The others were Linette, Krueger, Osaka & Masarova.
This is why I said these two days are the days with the most value in a tournament with first round byes. You get to back a good player with at least one match under their belt at the venue against a player of a similar level playing their first match.
Adapting on the fly usually isn't an issue for elite players and the only top 10 seed that lost was Rybakina but that wasn't incredibly surprising. Players seeded in the top 10 were 4-1 while the rest of the seeded players were 4-7.
Will we see a similar day today??
0
Yesterday 8 of the 16 seeded players lost their opening match. Their opponents were all either underdogs or pickems. There were the 4 I bet: Townsend, Fruhvirtova, Ruse & Baptiste. The others were Linette, Krueger, Osaka & Masarova.
This is why I said these two days are the days with the most value in a tournament with first round byes. You get to back a good player with at least one match under their belt at the venue against a player of a similar level playing their first match.
Adapting on the fly usually isn't an issue for elite players and the only top 10 seed that lost was Rybakina but that wasn't incredibly surprising. Players seeded in the top 10 were 4-1 while the rest of the seeded players were 4-7.
That's a good question. It was clear to me that yesterday there were a number of dogs with a lot of value. I don't see that at first glance today. The players that fit that profile are either inconsistent or unproven (Stearns, Eala, Mboko, Pera, Kudermetova, Sherif). The last 2 days at least 4 underdogs won, but I don't see them that clearly today. Maybe Uchijima, Birrell?
The one that i like the most is probably Kessler (vs Noskova).
0
@bringit
That's a good question. It was clear to me that yesterday there were a number of dogs with a lot of value. I don't see that at first glance today. The players that fit that profile are either inconsistent or unproven (Stearns, Eala, Mboko, Pera, Kudermetova, Sherif). The last 2 days at least 4 underdogs won, but I don't see them that clearly today. Maybe Uchijima, Birrell?
The one that i like the most is probably Kessler (vs Noskova).
Eala and Blinkova were the big dogs. It's crazy how undervalued and profitable Shnaider was all last year and this year she's overvalued and fading her is highly profitable, I just haven't done it enough. She hasn't done anything good since firing her coach.
Navarro has been the queen of the 3rd set this year but somehow the player with the mental and physical endurance to take her down was Raducanu.
Still can't believe Kessler pulled off her win to even up the h2h with Noskova at 1-1. I'm thinking that is a hard hitting rivalry we'll see quite a bit in the coming years.
1
@Uman
Eala and Blinkova were the big dogs. It's crazy how undervalued and profitable Shnaider was all last year and this year she's overvalued and fading her is highly profitable, I just haven't done it enough. She hasn't done anything good since firing her coach.
Navarro has been the queen of the 3rd set this year but somehow the player with the mental and physical endurance to take her down was Raducanu.
Still can't believe Kessler pulled off her win to even up the h2h with Noskova at 1-1. I'm thinking that is a hard hitting rivalry we'll see quite a bit in the coming years.
True. After looking so good in her last match it wouldn't surprise me if she continued with that form or instead she just completely lays an egg. Probably an equal probability of either happening.
0
@YELAWOLF
True. After looking so good in her last match it wouldn't surprise me if she continued with that form or instead she just completely lays an egg. Probably an equal probability of either happening.
MIAMI Moyuka Uchijima (+100) Victoria Mboko (+180) Peyton Stearns (+110) McCartney Kessler (+125) Probably not a 4-0 day but I can definitely see 3-1 and 2-2 still keeps us in the black.
Uchijima
Mboku
Stearns
Kessler
0
Quote Originally Posted by bringit:
MIAMI Moyuka Uchijima (+100) Victoria Mboko (+180) Peyton Stearns (+110) McCartney Kessler (+125) Probably not a 4-0 day but I can definitely see 3-1 and 2-2 still keeps us in the black.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
