My tennis strategy THE ZONE.

So the people that make millions at blackjack flat-bet right? 

Good comparison Calvone. Especially for the parlay side of things that get a similar return

I will give you one stat for my parlays. Ive never dropped below an average of one win out of 3 over any given run of 100 picks. Doesnt sound impressive until you factor in the fact the average odds are around the 2.5 times stake mark. And if you only bet on two match parlays tailing my picks over the last 3 years since I started to focus on them. You AGAIN wouldnt know what it is to lose 7 times in row.

Tell someone on their way to Vegas to play blackjack. You are never going to lose 7 times in a row. And most of the time never even 4. And I think theyd be pretty excited. But I cant make that claim for a game of chance like Blackjack. But I can for tennis.

What people steeped in math always fail to realize is sports betting is different from casino math based type betting. There is the human factor. That I make a decision on. Im not just pulling these bets out of a hat because they fall into the zones pricing range. No, I do my homework on each opponent then make a decision. Theres more to it than the roll of a dice, turn of a card or spin of a wheel.

BANKROLL 1054.25 units

Another winner. Nicely done. 

Thanks, its looking even better on my parlay thread. Theyre coming along nicely.

BANKROLL 1057.30 Units

Jules I don't play straight. I only parlay in real life. You need to keep that in mind. Look all can't see cant believe types like you have to throw your tuppence into the mix.

End it with an eastenders theme tune

Ok one step at a time

lol!!!

BANKROLL 1052.30 units

ATP STOCKHOLM

HERBERT@1.62--Stake 5 units

RECORD 85--39

I will elaborate later the objective is a profit if things get serious. I dont have to tell you what happens to average odds of 2.5 if you roll it up 5 times. And thats per unit.

I look forward to the mathematical elaboration ??

BANKROLL 1047.30

ATP STOCKHOLM

J.SOCK@1.67--Stake 10 units

RECORD 85--40

01--1×2.5×2.5×2.5×2.5×2.5=97.65 units

This what I would recover if I ever get 5 consecutive losses while playing for parlays. You can look at it as a self inflicted juice.

You can indeed argue is it worth doing. Given I rarely even have 5 consecutive losses. Of course your mathematical mind can never accept that. There is no logic to my claim. BUT THERE IS REALITY.

Thats all I can say. For every 5 loss I suffer I will average 5 fold in profit. Its simply a winner Jules. Do you know how hard it is to pick 5 consecutive dogs in a row Jules???

Very, very hard. I have been over a year and a 1000 bets without it happening. YES IM SERIOUS. My longest gap between 5 losses was 14 months and 1300 bets. Maybe im due one because its been over 1000 bets now since the last one.

Maybe in your world you arent used to methods that have what I call a virtual limit. But in my world you had better get used to it.

what does this mean? A VIRTUAL LIMIT. Its simply a point that is breached so rarley it raises a method to grail like status. What it basically means Jules is everyone following this method and my staking has it made longterm.

You are destined to PROFIT. Which is the name of the game. Especially with ROLLING PARLAYS

Something disturbing me at the moment is how little interest the rolling parlay thread is getting. Half the world should be glued to that thread. Because as you will all soon realize it only goes in one direction the vast majority of the time. And it does it faster than any straight bet strategy ever could on favourites. With fewer bets.

So maybe I dont need the insurance bet. All it would mean jules is I recover a sizeable portion of my stake the next time I roll 5 losses. One the rolling parlay thread makes its first 100 units or 1000 quid profit. Watch it snowball.

I will be risking ever increasing amounts until an average win will represent what some people earn in a week. Its all coming Jules. Stay on the merry go round...

BANKROLL 1054 units

So you win 97 units for a streak of 5 losses

Jules there is no SET amount for staking. I use instinctive staking. Depending on how I feel about the match at hand and the price of the match.

Example a few days ago I lost two in a row. 5 units then 5 units again. (See you didnt realize my first two bets stay the same) Then BECAUSE the most common losing streak is two. And I felt very confident about Strycova. I jumped from 5 units to 30.

Now yesterday AGAIN I lost two in a row with the morning matches on Bhambri at 5 units. And Herbert at 5 units. BUT on my next bet I only jumped to 10 units. There were two reasons for this. 1-- I didnt have too much confidence in Sock. BUT 2--More importantly, because I had just had two lots of 2 losses in a row. It was possible I was about to have 3.

This type of flexible instinctive staking on STRAIGHTS. is essential to succeed longterm. You respond to the circumstances. You dont just mechanically bet the same everytime.

So in essence im not using a mechanical doubling up martingale system. I stake what I personally feel is the appropriate amount under the current circumstances. And because two lossed in a row followed by 2 or more wins in a row IS SO COMMON. Its a winning proposition especially for rolling parlays. On the other thread Ive now bet on just 11 parlays and won 6 of them. I only need a 33% strikerate longterm to profit.

Its a winner all the way jules. A few years from now every sceptic will be scratching their head. Part of the reason im documenting the Zone on here is to prove to people who think longterm winning is near impossible how wrong theyre.

And people like you who think math explains everything will be in for the biggest shock.

BANKROLL 1058 units

ATP STOCKHOLM

F.VERDASCO@1.67

RECORD 87--40

STAKE 5 units

So you make it up as you go along. And call it THE ZONE

Thanks...

BANKROLL 1053 units

ATP STOCKHOLM

MANNERINA@1.67--Stake 5 units

RECORD 87--41

At his average betting odds he would be close to 20 units up after 120+ games?  I think this is astounding.  Who else has a record like this?  So, if you parlayed them and/or the potential losers it could be great.  I have done it a couple of times myself before in years past---it can be pretty sweet ROI.