"Azarenka vs Lepchenko too much juice and don't trust Azarenka lately with spreads not covering most times -5.5 is high but she could cover. Not worth a play"
Good thing we laid off match went exactly as predicted., Azarenka broken at 5-3 serving for match, would have been extremely pissed if I took that. Azarenka hasn't been covering many spreads this hard court season.
0
Analysis from yesterday:
"Azarenka vs Lepchenko too much juice and don't trust Azarenka lately with spreads not covering most times -5.5 is high but she could cover. Not worth a play"
Good thing we laid off match went exactly as predicted., Azarenka broken at 5-3 serving for match, would have been extremely pissed if I took that. Azarenka hasn't been covering many spreads this hard court season.
Dude, I like how much you follow WTA (and I always read your info), but you need to stop playing both sides of a match...
(e.g. "Azarenka vs Lepchenko too much juice and don't trust Azarenka lately with spreads not covering most times -5.5 is high but she could cover. Not worth a play")
...and then following your non-play with "exactly as predicted."
0
Dude, I like how much you follow WTA (and I always read your info), but you need to stop playing both sides of a match...
(e.g. "Azarenka vs Lepchenko too much juice and don't trust Azarenka lately with spreads not covering most times -5.5 is high but she could cover. Not worth a play")
...and then following your non-play with "exactly as predicted."
Dude, I like how much you follow WTA (and I always read your info), but you need to stop playing both sides of a match...
(e.g. "Azarenka vs Lepchenko too much juice and don't trust Azarenka lately with spreads not covering most times -5.5 is high but she could cover. Not worth a play")
...and then following your non-play with "exactly as predicted."
Thanks for the support man, I appreciate it.
Bad choice of words, I wrote that at 2:00AM.... My point was Azarenka hasn't been covering spreads lately and that's why I said not worth a play. When I said she could cover, what I should have wrote was "I don't think Lepchenko is that great of a player and if Azarenka serves well she'll cover"
At the end of the day, I recommended no play so even if it hit, I wouldn't have been mad. If Azarenka won that, I wouldn't have said "Match went exactly as predicted should have played it."
I'll be more detailed in my write ups for future purposes, apologize about that. I hope you understand what I meant better by clearing that up.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ImWickedSmart:
Dude, I like how much you follow WTA (and I always read your info), but you need to stop playing both sides of a match...
(e.g. "Azarenka vs Lepchenko too much juice and don't trust Azarenka lately with spreads not covering most times -5.5 is high but she could cover. Not worth a play")
...and then following your non-play with "exactly as predicted."
Thanks for the support man, I appreciate it.
Bad choice of words, I wrote that at 2:00AM.... My point was Azarenka hasn't been covering spreads lately and that's why I said not worth a play. When I said she could cover, what I should have wrote was "I don't think Lepchenko is that great of a player and if Azarenka serves well she'll cover"
At the end of the day, I recommended no play so even if it hit, I wouldn't have been mad. If Azarenka won that, I wouldn't have said "Match went exactly as predicted should have played it."
I'll be more detailed in my write ups for future purposes, apologize about that. I hope you understand what I meant better by clearing that up.
Lisicki vs Halep at -5.5 is too high of a spread. Lisicki serves well, can be crappy at times and Halep rallies better but Lisicki power could hurt Halep. I still think Halep wins, but not worth a play.
Exactly wrong on this match thus far for example... I'm not trying to play both sides, I'm trying to give insight as to why/why not someone should win with a spread or not and etc.....
Hope this clears things up and as stated I will be a lot more detailed on future write ups.
Kvitova vs Konta -5.5 is too high as Konta has great wins this week and hasn't lost on hard court in awhile. I would imagine Konta covers spread, but Petra may be able to over power Konta. Petra won't suffer in the conditions bad since Ashe is indoor basically and it'll be cooler tonight. No Play
Do the write ups make any more sense or should I just not write them any longer? Want an honest opinion from all who tail. I'm not the best at writing lol, I know what I want to put out in my head but, sometimes have a bad choice of words.
0
Lisicki vs Halep at -5.5 is too high of a spread. Lisicki serves well, can be crappy at times and Halep rallies better but Lisicki power could hurt Halep. I still think Halep wins, but not worth a play.
Exactly wrong on this match thus far for example... I'm not trying to play both sides, I'm trying to give insight as to why/why not someone should win with a spread or not and etc.....
Hope this clears things up and as stated I will be a lot more detailed on future write ups.
Kvitova vs Konta -5.5 is too high as Konta has great wins this week and hasn't lost on hard court in awhile. I would imagine Konta covers spread, but Petra may be able to over power Konta. Petra won't suffer in the conditions bad since Ashe is indoor basically and it'll be cooler tonight. No Play
Do the write ups make any more sense or should I just not write them any longer? Want an honest opinion from all who tail. I'm not the best at writing lol, I know what I want to put out in my head but, sometimes have a bad choice of words.
Lisicki's power hurting Halep as stated, so I'm right on that point... That's what I'm trying to do by writing what I write, put insight into your head as to what can hurt certain players or help them and etc.
I can do more detailed write ups and write strengths/weaknesses when I have extra time and etc. Would like insight as to what you guys prefer? I should hire Eagles on here to do write ups for me hahaha, guy is the best at writing.
0
Lisicki's power hurting Halep as stated, so I'm right on that point... That's what I'm trying to do by writing what I write, put insight into your head as to what can hurt certain players or help them and etc.
I can do more detailed write ups and write strengths/weaknesses when I have extra time and etc. Would like insight as to what you guys prefer? I should hire Eagles on here to do write ups for me hahaha, guy is the best at writing.
Bad choice of words, I wrote that at 2:00AM.... My point was Azarenka hasn't been covering spreads lately and that's why I said not worth a play. When I said she could cover, what I should have wrote was "I don't think Lepchenko is that great of a player and if Azarenka serves well she'll cover"
At the end of the day, I recommended no play so even if it hit, I wouldn't have been mad. If Azarenka won that, I wouldn't have said "Match went exactly as predicted should have played it."
I'll be more detailed in my write ups for future purposes, apologize about that. I hope you understand what I meant better by clearing that up.
Thanks for that response total class
0
Quote Originally Posted by LICappers:
Thanks for the support man, I appreciate it.
Bad choice of words, I wrote that at 2:00AM.... My point was Azarenka hasn't been covering spreads lately and that's why I said not worth a play. When I said she could cover, what I should have wrote was "I don't think Lepchenko is that great of a player and if Azarenka serves well she'll cover"
At the end of the day, I recommended no play so even if it hit, I wouldn't have been mad. If Azarenka won that, I wouldn't have said "Match went exactly as predicted should have played it."
I'll be more detailed in my write ups for future purposes, apologize about that. I hope you understand what I meant better by clearing that up.
Thanks Boomer, I appreciate your constant support. My goal is to always make money for everyone on this forum that follows my plays. I don't want anyone to think I'm doing them wrong because of a bad choice of words, I told everyone not to play Azarenka match anyway.
Do you think I should do write ups still? Does my clarification make more sense with the Azarenka match?
0
Quote Originally Posted by boomersooner18:
Thanks Boomer, I appreciate your constant support. My goal is to always make money for everyone on this forum that follows my plays. I don't want anyone to think I'm doing them wrong because of a bad choice of words, I told everyone not to play Azarenka match anyway.
Do you think I should do write ups still? Does my clarification make more sense with the Azarenka match?
And she does it. Azarenka vs Halep is awesome. I'm so happy I'm guaranteed to see one of them in the Semi-Finals, now praying for Kvitova to make it on the other side.
0
Quote Originally Posted by sunset:
cmon romanian girl
And she does it. Azarenka vs Halep is awesome. I'm so happy I'm guaranteed to see one of them in the Semi-Finals, now praying for Kvitova to make it on the other side.
not trying to be a hater so please don't take it like that but...
if you didn't like the spread laying the games why didn't you take for instance lisicki plus the games?
I went heavy on Pennetta and I prefer to make 1-2 WTA plays per day maximum. I don't like to take too many plays, I have been using a new method since I've been up these 97 units of going heavy on my favorite plays of good value and it's been working. When I was taking spreads all the time, I'd always lost by the 1/2 point. +5.5 is too high in this far in the tournament in my opinion.
0
Quote Originally Posted by binka34:
not trying to be a hater so please don't take it like that but...
if you didn't like the spread laying the games why didn't you take for instance lisicki plus the games?
I went heavy on Pennetta and I prefer to make 1-2 WTA plays per day maximum. I don't like to take too many plays, I have been using a new method since I've been up these 97 units of going heavy on my favorite plays of good value and it's been working. When I was taking spreads all the time, I'd always lost by the 1/2 point. +5.5 is too high in this far in the tournament in my opinion.
not trying to be a hater so please don't take it like that but...
if you didn't like the spread laying the games why didn't you take for instance lisicki plus the games?
Also, those matches in my eyes could have went either way in terms of the spread and they did. Vika loses by 1/2 and same with Halep. That's too risky in my eyes to be risking $100-150 on... I play under/over usually more than spreads, but like I said this far in the tournament spreads are tough at -/+5.5 to cover on either side.
0
Quote Originally Posted by binka34:
not trying to be a hater so please don't take it like that but...
if you didn't like the spread laying the games why didn't you take for instance lisicki plus the games?
Also, those matches in my eyes could have went either way in terms of the spread and they did. Vika loses by 1/2 and same with Halep. That's too risky in my eyes to be risking $100-150 on... I play under/over usually more than spreads, but like I said this far in the tournament spreads are tough at -/+5.5 to cover on either side.
I appreciate you asking in a nice gesture, some people just love to hate on here and it's discouraging. WTA spreads make you rip your hair out. I just hate high spreads in Majors, look at Djokovic yesterday, he was rolling then blew it.
BOL this week man!
0
Quote Originally Posted by binka34:
gotcha
looking good so far
was just curious
yeah i agree though
WTA will give you a heart attack
I appreciate you asking in a nice gesture, some people just love to hate on here and it's discouraging. WTA spreads make you rip your hair out. I just hate high spreads in Majors, look at Djokovic yesterday, he was rolling then blew it.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
