Angle, Thx for the spreadsheet link for 1st & 4th Qtrs. Do you happen to know if they are exactly up to date?
Go_Nads, I have no idea how to do or what in the world sdql is... If you could find up to date SU records for all teams 1st and 4th Qtrs that would be perfect! I will surely try to find a way to dig up some winners in return for all of us. If I could get your SU records I can pair them with the ATS records on the SS Angle provided and you guys would have answered some of my prayers.
Appreciate it fellas!
0
Angle, Thx for the spreadsheet link for 1st & 4th Qtrs. Do you happen to know if they are exactly up to date?
Go_Nads, I have no idea how to do or what in the world sdql is... If you could find up to date SU records for all teams 1st and 4th Qtrs that would be perfect! I will surely try to find a way to dig up some winners in return for all of us. If I could get your SU records I can pair them with the ATS records on the SS Angle provided and you guys would have answered some of my prayers.
Angle, Thx for the spreadsheet link for 1st & 4th Qtrs. Do you happen to know if they are exactly up to date?
Go_Nads, I have no idea how to do or what in the world sdql is... If you could find up to date SU records for all teams 1st and 4th Qtrs that would be perfect! I will surely try to find a way to dig up some winners in return for all of us. If I could get your SU records I can pair them with the ATS records on the SS Angle provided and you guys would have answered some of my prayers.
Appreciate it fellas!
Give this a try: https://tinyurl.com/bt6oyo8
I included the query and the website if you want to update the records down the road.
0
Quote Originally Posted by hi2ak:
Angle, Thx for the spreadsheet link for 1st & 4th Qtrs. Do you happen to know if they are exactly up to date?
Go_Nads, I have no idea how to do or what in the world sdql is... If you could find up to date SU records for all teams 1st and 4th Qtrs that would be perfect! I will surely try to find a way to dig up some winners in return for all of us. If I could get your SU records I can pair them with the ATS records on the SS Angle provided and you guys would have answered some of my prayers.
Appreciate it fellas!
Give this a try: https://tinyurl.com/bt6oyo8
I included the query and the website if you want to update the records down the road.
Angle, Thx for the spreadsheet link for 1st & 4th Qtrs. Do you happen to know if they are exactly up to date?
Go_Nads, I have no idea how to do or what in the world sdql is... If you could find up to date SU records for all teams 1st and 4th Qtrs that would be perfect! I will surely try to find a way to dig up some winners in return for all of us. If I could get your SU records I can pair them with the ATS records on the SS Angle provided and you guys would have answered some of my prayers.
Appreciate it fellas!
As far as I know Billybarooo keeps them up to date. Also as far as I know all results are ATS, not SU.
Billy can correct me if I have anything wrong.
0
Quote Originally Posted by hi2ak:
Angle, Thx for the spreadsheet link for 1st & 4th Qtrs. Do you happen to know if they are exactly up to date?
Go_Nads, I have no idea how to do or what in the world sdql is... If you could find up to date SU records for all teams 1st and 4th Qtrs that would be perfect! I will surely try to find a way to dig up some winners in return for all of us. If I could get your SU records I can pair them with the ATS records on the SS Angle provided and you guys would have answered some of my prayers.
Appreciate it fellas!
As far as I know Billybarooo keeps them up to date. Also as far as I know all results are ATS, not SU.
System said to buy a point to +14. I always post the official line the system calls for.
This way the play can be graded win, lose or push one way or another and people don't all have different lines and get different results. If Det covers the +14 the chase is a winner.
I had them at +13 and bought to +14. System email said they anticipated public line movement but didn't want us to wait around and take a chance because this system has moved the line against us in the past.
Plus, I wanted to get off-line early today and watch some games!
If you play a different line and lose and the +14 wins, the system records the play a winner.
If you want to gamble and wait for the public to bet SA line up so you won't have to buy a point, it's at your risk.
Yesterday Philly was at -1 or pick em in my book and they ended up at +2, I think. System email was late and said pick'em.
I released the play without official line as Philly ML. Luckily we didn't need the extra 2 points as Philly won easily.
I've lost before by 1 point with different lines so I always get as close as I can to the official line!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Stake24:
Where did you get DET at +14?
System said to buy a point to +14. I always post the official line the system calls for.
This way the play can be graded win, lose or push one way or another and people don't all have different lines and get different results. If Det covers the +14 the chase is a winner.
I had them at +13 and bought to +14. System email said they anticipated public line movement but didn't want us to wait around and take a chance because this system has moved the line against us in the past.
Plus, I wanted to get off-line early today and watch some games!
If you play a different line and lose and the +14 wins, the system records the play a winner.
If you want to gamble and wait for the public to bet SA line up so you won't have to buy a point, it's at your risk.
Yesterday Philly was at -1 or pick em in my book and they ended up at +2, I think. System email was late and said pick'em.
I released the play without official line as Philly ML. Luckily we didn't need the extra 2 points as Philly won easily.
I've lost before by 1 point with different lines so I always get as close as I can to the official line!
billybarooo, for your ATS spreadsheet, for ex: Toronto has played 60 games played so far this season. According to your ATS SS W/L total only 54 games played. Are the unlisted games the result of a Push?
0
billybarooo, for your ATS spreadsheet, for ex: Toronto has played 60 games played so far this season. According to your ATS SS W/L total only 54 games played. Are the unlisted games the result of a Push?
System said to buy a point to +14. I always post the official line the system calls for.
This way the play can be graded win, lose or push one way or another and people don't all have different lines and get different results. If Det covers the +14 the chase is a winner.
I had them at +13 and bought to +14. System email said they anticipated public line movement but didn't want us to wait around and take a chance because this system has moved the line against us in the past.
Plus, I wanted to get off-line early today and watch some games!
If you play a different line and lose and the +14 wins, the system records the play a winner.
If you want to gamble and wait for the public to bet SA line up so you won't have to buy a point, it's at your risk.
Yesterday Philly was at -1 or pick em in my book and they ended up at +2, I think. System email was late and said pick'em.
I released the play without official line as Philly ML. Luckily we didn't need the extra 2 points as Philly won easily.
I've lost before by 1 point with different lines so I always get as close as I can to the official line!
Thnx for clarifying and thank you to all you guys for your hard work....can't wait to see the prospectus tomorrow.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Angle4U999:
System said to buy a point to +14. I always post the official line the system calls for.
This way the play can be graded win, lose or push one way or another and people don't all have different lines and get different results. If Det covers the +14 the chase is a winner.
I had them at +13 and bought to +14. System email said they anticipated public line movement but didn't want us to wait around and take a chance because this system has moved the line against us in the past.
Plus, I wanted to get off-line early today and watch some games!
If you play a different line and lose and the +14 wins, the system records the play a winner.
If you want to gamble and wait for the public to bet SA line up so you won't have to buy a point, it's at your risk.
Yesterday Philly was at -1 or pick em in my book and they ended up at +2, I think. System email was late and said pick'em.
I released the play without official line as Philly ML. Luckily we didn't need the extra 2 points as Philly won easily.
I've lost before by 1 point with different lines so I always get as close as I can to the official line!
Thnx for clarifying and thank you to all you guys for your hard work....can't wait to see the prospectus tomorrow.
billybarooo, for your ATS spreadsheet, for ex: Toronto has played 60 games played so far this season. According to your ATS SS W/L total only 54 games played. Are the unlisted games the result of a Push?
Yes
0
Quote Originally Posted by hi2ak:
billybarooo, for your ATS spreadsheet, for ex: Toronto has played 60 games played so far this season. According to your ATS SS W/L total only 54 games played. Are the unlisted games the result of a Push?
QBUN, keep your eyes on Balt, Sea and KC in MLB pre-season. I believe they have the best records. I played 2 on my own today. 2-0 as Sea and KC won. Balt wasn't on my book maybe a split squad game.
Of course I didn't play as high amount as I did with Semper's plays!
0
QBUN, keep your eyes on Balt, Sea and KC in MLB pre-season. I believe they have the best records. I played 2 on my own today. 2-0 as Sea and KC won. Balt wasn't on my book maybe a split squad game.
Of course I didn't play as high amount as I did with Semper's plays!
I like the Bulls 1Q play hi2ak. I also like under for the game. I'm getting this in before watching hockey game.
The Chicago Bulls bring a modest 2-game winning streak into tonight's contest
after their win at home on Saturday over the Nets, 96-85. Problem here is that
the Bulls are in the second of a back-to-back spot. This usually means the Bulls
will look to slow the pace way down. The last seven times in this spot, their
game has gone UNDER. When this second game has been on the road, the Bulls have
played five straight UNDERS. The Pacers haven't been scoring much of late,
posting 93 or fewer points in three of their last four games. Indiana is coming
off a road win at Toronto, 93-81. These clubs usually play pretty close to the
vest, evidenced by the seven of the last nine meetings going UNDER the total.
0
I like the Bulls 1Q play hi2ak. I also like under for the game. I'm getting this in before watching hockey game.
The Chicago Bulls bring a modest 2-game winning streak into tonight's contest
after their win at home on Saturday over the Nets, 96-85. Problem here is that
the Bulls are in the second of a back-to-back spot. This usually means the Bulls
will look to slow the pace way down. The last seven times in this spot, their
game has gone UNDER. When this second game has been on the road, the Bulls have
played five straight UNDERS. The Pacers haven't been scoring much of late,
posting 93 or fewer points in three of their last four games. Indiana is coming
off a road win at Toronto, 93-81. These clubs usually play pretty close to the
vest, evidenced by the seven of the last nine meetings going UNDER the total.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.