Wonju Dongbu Promy 2.5 | |
grab it fast, soft line
If 20 member's could contribute $300 each making our average unit size $6,000 per play and the fund could average series wins of 15 wins at +110 for every loss each month that is an earnings total of $57,000. An administrative fee of 15% would earn S&S $8550.00 and return each member $2,122 in profits or over 700% of initial investment.
Second month we each contribute an extra unit to the fund and repeat the same winning ratio of 15-1 and S&S earns $17,100 for their time with each member receiving $4,545 or 1500% of their original $300 investment.
Assuming 20 members contribute one additional unit to the fund each month to increase our unit size gradually and the 15-1 win ratio is met. At the end of September S&S would have earned themselves $179,500 with each member receiving just over $50,271...not too bad considering our initial risk as a member is $300 out of pocket!
As for the IRS issue, if 40% goes to them oh well, I am still up $30,000 for doing nothing!
Just a thought!
If 20 member's could contribute $300 each making our average unit size $6,000 per play and the fund could average series wins of 15 wins at +110 for every loss each month that is an earnings total of $57,000. An administrative fee of 15% would earn S&S $8550.00 and return each member $2,122 in profits or over 700% of initial investment.
Second month we each contribute an extra unit to the fund and repeat the same winning ratio of 15-1 and S&S earns $17,100 for their time with each member receiving $4,545 or 1500% of their original $300 investment.
Assuming 20 members contribute one additional unit to the fund each month to increase our unit size gradually and the 15-1 win ratio is met. At the end of September S&S would have earned themselves $179,500 with each member receiving just over $50,271...not too bad considering our initial risk as a member is $300 out of pocket!
As for the IRS issue, if 40% goes to them oh well, I am still up $30,000 for doing nothing!
Just a thought!
Q, how is your system doing?
Today is game 2 on chase of CHICAGO -7. Newfie found this system, now 7 - 0, I just documented it.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArtvW2coXCHsdEYxLU50cTdIUUtGZmkwekVxMVdQN1E#gid=0
Q, how is your system doing?
Today is game 2 on chase of CHICAGO -7. Newfie found this system, now 7 - 0, I just documented it.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArtvW2coXCHsdEYxLU50cTdIUUtGZmkwekVxMVdQN1E#gid=0
If 20 member's could contribute $300 each making our average unit size $6,000 per play and the fund could average series wins of 15 wins at +110 for every loss each month that is an earnings total of $57,000. An administrative fee of 15% would earn S&S $8550.00 and return each member $2,122 in profits or over 700% of initial investment.
Second month we each contribute an extra unit to the fund and repeat the same winning ratio of 15-1 and S&S earns $17,100 for their time with each member receiving $4,545 or 1500% of their original $300 investment.
Assuming 20 members contribute one additional unit to the fund each month to increase our unit size gradually and the 15-1 win ratio is met. At the end of September S&S would have earned themselves $179,500 with each member receiving just over $50,271...not too bad considering our initial risk as a member is $300 out of pocket!
As for the IRS issue, if 40% goes to them oh well, I am still up $30,000 for doing nothing!
Just a thought!
I LIKE IT! And as for the IRS, you can always pay your 40% and sleep better at night!
If 20 member's could contribute $300 each making our average unit size $6,000 per play and the fund could average series wins of 15 wins at +110 for every loss each month that is an earnings total of $57,000. An administrative fee of 15% would earn S&S $8550.00 and return each member $2,122 in profits or over 700% of initial investment.
Second month we each contribute an extra unit to the fund and repeat the same winning ratio of 15-1 and S&S earns $17,100 for their time with each member receiving $4,545 or 1500% of their original $300 investment.
Assuming 20 members contribute one additional unit to the fund each month to increase our unit size gradually and the 15-1 win ratio is met. At the end of September S&S would have earned themselves $179,500 with each member receiving just over $50,271...not too bad considering our initial risk as a member is $300 out of pocket!
As for the IRS issue, if 40% goes to them oh well, I am still up $30,000 for doing nothing!
Just a thought!
I LIKE IT! And as for the IRS, you can always pay your 40% and sleep better at night!
McShady and I have the discipline to run this for you guys and we only want the guys who share our passion for making money not making bets and also understand there is a risk involved in any investment! I think this will work and we could create shares with a weekly/daily price per share based on the amount of money in the accounts..
McShady and I have the discipline to run this for you guys and we only want the guys who share our passion for making money not making bets and also understand there is a risk involved in any investment! I think this will work and we could create shares with a weekly/daily price per share based on the amount of money in the accounts..
Note: This in-state hardwood-battle may not quite classify as a ‘Civil War’ (as it does on the gridiron) but the revenge-minded Beavers arrive in Eugene with plenty of ammunition. For starters, the dog in OSU games this season is 15-7-1 ATS this season. And that fits like a needle in the Biogenesis Clinic to Oregon’s 2012-2013 campaign.
You see, the Ducks are the epitome of a team playing to the level of its
opposition this season, going 8-1 SU and 7-2 ATS versus greater than .666 foes –
but only 3-12 ATS versus .666 or less competition. Add the fact that the webbed
ones enter off a same-season revenger versus Stanford (1-5 SU and 2-4 ATS after
clashing with the Cardinal) with a same-season revenger against Colorado waiting
on deck and you can see why we feel they may be bringing just a water gun to
this Thursday night tussle. With that, we say grab the points as the Beavers
make amends for an earlier home loss.
Note: This in-state hardwood-battle may not quite classify as a ‘Civil War’ (as it does on the gridiron) but the revenge-minded Beavers arrive in Eugene with plenty of ammunition. For starters, the dog in OSU games this season is 15-7-1 ATS this season. And that fits like a needle in the Biogenesis Clinic to Oregon’s 2012-2013 campaign.
You see, the Ducks are the epitome of a team playing to the level of its
opposition this season, going 8-1 SU and 7-2 ATS versus greater than .666 foes –
but only 3-12 ATS versus .666 or less competition. Add the fact that the webbed
ones enter off a same-season revenger versus Stanford (1-5 SU and 2-4 ATS after
clashing with the Cardinal) with a same-season revenger against Colorado waiting
on deck and you can see why we feel they may be bringing just a water gun to
this Thursday night tussle. With that, we say grab the points as the Beavers
make amends for an earlier home loss.
I think Chips was saying $300 initial investment and then start using profits to increase bets. Then once a betting level is reached, then profits are distributed (didvidends). Max outlay $300
Perhaps, there would be several cluds with varying investments. The $100 club, $500 club, etc. Each club would have it's own betting site with McShady and Semper access to the bets and funds and a few others to coordinate distributions...
As Nads says, there is a trust factor here. No offense to anyone! But maybe that's why you have different club levels.
More food for thought...
I think Chips was saying $300 initial investment and then start using profits to increase bets. Then once a betting level is reached, then profits are distributed (didvidends). Max outlay $300
Perhaps, there would be several cluds with varying investments. The $100 club, $500 club, etc. Each club would have it's own betting site with McShady and Semper access to the bets and funds and a few others to coordinate distributions...
As Nads says, there is a trust factor here. No offense to anyone! But maybe that's why you have different club levels.
More food for thought...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.