PHX-CHI - OVER 189,5
Line – opened at
189, dropped to 188 then moved up to 189,5
Public seems to
like UNDER more (56%)
Phoenix is
playing 4th game in last 5 days, Chicago 3rd game in last 4 days, they both
played yesterday – that means less defence – and for me the stat I’m looking at
is Opp points/game:
PHX – 100,2 in
season – 98,3 last 10 games (1,9 pts less than season avg)
CHI – 92,2 in
season – 96,6 last 10 games (4,4 pts more than season avg)
They played this
season already – total was 218 after o.t. (200 after 4th qtr)
In last 10 meetings they scored:
218, 215, 191,
238 (o.t.), 216, 219, 233, 183, 165, 214
Yesterday with
similar trend I’ve picked UNDER in PHX-BKN but this time the trend seems to
confirm my pick due to line movement...
Also looked at
referees stats – and they are supporting OVER with avg. total scores (although
I’m not convinced if this is a big factor...)
Another factor –
PHX was averaging about 40 % FG for last 5 games (thats way below season avg which
is 48 %).
Against the pick
is „Saturday under theory“ – but since november 2007 they played on saturday
only once – the game ended with 233 points!
My record: 3-0
PHX-CHI - OVER 189,5
Line – opened at
189, dropped to 188 then moved up to 189,5
Public seems to
like UNDER more (56%)
Phoenix is
playing 4th game in last 5 days, Chicago 3rd game in last 4 days, they both
played yesterday – that means less defence – and for me the stat I’m looking at
is Opp points/game:
PHX – 100,2 in
season – 98,3 last 10 games (1,9 pts less than season avg)
CHI – 92,2 in
season – 96,6 last 10 games (4,4 pts more than season avg)
They played this
season already – total was 218 after o.t. (200 after 4th qtr)
In last 10 meetings they scored:
218, 215, 191,
238 (o.t.), 216, 219, 233, 183, 165, 214
Yesterday with
similar trend I’ve picked UNDER in PHX-BKN but this time the trend seems to
confirm my pick due to line movement...
Also looked at
referees stats – and they are supporting OVER with avg. total scores (although
I’m not convinced if this is a big factor...)
Another factor –
PHX was averaging about 40 % FG for last 5 games (thats way below season avg which
is 48 %).
Against the pick
is „Saturday under theory“ – but since november 2007 they played on saturday
only once – the game ended with 233 points!
My record: 3-0
PHX-CHI - OVER 189,5
Line – opened at
189, dropped to 188 then moved up to 189,5
Public seems to
like UNDER more (56%)
Phoenix is
playing 4th game in last 5 days, Chicago 3rd game in last 4 days, they both
played yesterday – that means less defence – and for me the stat I’m looking at
is Opp points/game:
PHX – 100,2 in
season – 98,3 last 10 games (1,9 pts less than season avg)
CHI – 92,2 in
season – 96,6 last 10 games (4,4 pts more than season avg)
They played this
season already – total was 218 after o.t. (200 after 4th qtr)
In last 10 meetings they scored:
218, 215, 191,
238 (o.t.), 216, 219, 233, 183, 165, 214
Yesterday with
similar trend I’ve picked UNDER in PHX-BKN but this time the trend seems to
confirm my pick due to line movement...
Also looked at
referees stats – and they are supporting OVER with avg. total scores (although
I’m not convinced if this is a big factor...)
Another factor –
PHX was averaging about 40 % FG for last 5 games (thats way below season avg which
is 48 %).
Against the pick
is „Saturday under theory“ – but since november 2007 they played on saturday
only once – the game ended with 233 points!
My record: 3-0
PHX-CHI - OVER 189,5
Line – opened at
189, dropped to 188 then moved up to 189,5
Public seems to
like UNDER more (56%)
Phoenix is
playing 4th game in last 5 days, Chicago 3rd game in last 4 days, they both
played yesterday – that means less defence – and for me the stat I’m looking at
is Opp points/game:
PHX – 100,2 in
season – 98,3 last 10 games (1,9 pts less than season avg)
CHI – 92,2 in
season – 96,6 last 10 games (4,4 pts more than season avg)
They played this
season already – total was 218 after o.t. (200 after 4th qtr)
In last 10 meetings they scored:
218, 215, 191,
238 (o.t.), 216, 219, 233, 183, 165, 214
Yesterday with
similar trend I’ve picked UNDER in PHX-BKN but this time the trend seems to
confirm my pick due to line movement...
Also looked at
referees stats – and they are supporting OVER with avg. total scores (although
I’m not convinced if this is a big factor...)
Another factor –
PHX was averaging about 40 % FG for last 5 games (thats way below season avg which
is 48 %).
Against the pick
is „Saturday under theory“ – but since november 2007 they played on saturday
only once – the game ended with 233 points!
My record: 3-0
Interesting
thing about:
MIA-SAC (total)
During their
last 16 meetings those teams played 3 times on saturday – all those games went
UNDER (over/under last 16 is 10-6).
Just an observation that supports Mavins "Saturday under theory" (as I call it ;) )
Interesting
thing about:
MIA-SAC (total)
During their
last 16 meetings those teams played 3 times on saturday – all those games went
UNDER (over/under last 16 is 10-6).
Just an observation that supports Mavins "Saturday under theory" (as I call it ;) )
Interesting
thing about:
MIA-SAC (total)
During their
last 16 meetings those teams played 3 times on saturday – all those games went
UNDER (over/under last 16 is 10-6).
Just an observation that supports Mavins "Saturday under theory" (as I call it ;) )
Interesting
thing about:
MIA-SAC (total)
During their
last 16 meetings those teams played 3 times on saturday – all those games went
UNDER (over/under last 16 is 10-6).
Just an observation that supports Mavins "Saturday under theory" (as I call it ;) )
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.