All Forums | Website Promotions

phixers 21st century schizoid man nfl week 9

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 115291
Posts: 479
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 938
Posted: #26
Its ok cant win them all
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2014
Posts: 501
Posted: #27
If the refs had called the hold that was clear as day then that would be a fg....Phix had right side, Vegas had refs 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1971
Posted: #28
The refs should of called holding on that td  that  was a tough beat
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2012
Posts: 1185
Posted: #29
any 2H action phix?
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2014
Posts: 501
Posted: #30
Still pissed about the hold call
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 17430
Posted: #31
 GL this week, PHIXER.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 1660
Posted: #32
Nice pick first half son
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2014
Posts: 501
Posted: #33
Uh oh this could be the 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2014
Posts: 42
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by Tien2262:

Nice pick first half son

Tien2262...you sir a moron...Phixer has crushed the NFL this year to an almost $10 grand profit...you are a troll who has no idea about bankroll management and life in general...so  let me be the first, not the last i gurantee it, to tell you to get lost and learnnnnnnnnnnn.....dummy
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2014
Posts: 349
Posted: #35
He's gonna get 6 for sure 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2014
Posts: 501
Posted: #36
Quote Originally Posted by Tien2262:

Nice pick first half son

Screw off douche .... Where is your posted record????
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2015
Posts: 229
Posted: #37
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2014
Posts: 501
Posted: #38
Quote Originally Posted by phixer:

NFL Week 9: TNF CIN Bengals vs CLE Browns Totals

This is a 5 Units Play

Under 45.5  -110   550$


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2012
Posts: 1185
Posted: #39
That was close 

Under 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2014
Posts: 349
Posted: #40
Dre Kirk is in on the phix?  Haha  
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2014
Posts: 349
Posted: #41
Dre Kirk is in on the phix?  Haha  
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 6
Posted: #42
These continual backdoor cover situations are gonna give me a full head of grey hair at 27

Well played Phix
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2015
Posts: 123
Posted: #43
Cheers Phix. Was with you here. Had 31-13 for the game. 

The Jungle is 8-0!
WHO DEY

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2015
Posts: 7
Posted: #44
congrats boss 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 1020
Posted: #45
Yo posted your really close to game time bro. Would you rather bet that that late bro. Anyway thanks for your picks
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 4174
Posted: #46
Quote Originally Posted by phixer:

NFL Week 9: TNF CIN Bengals vs CLE Browns First Half

The Keys to this game handicapping are the following in my opinion:

The offensive output of the Browns is seriously decimated by the probable absence of few key offensive players including the QB and 2 wide receivers. Manziel  - the replacement QB for McCown was the one who has suffered that 0-30 home defeat to the same Bengals he faces today in last season.

The teams are Over machines with 7-1 (CIN) and 5-2 (CLE), but Vegas chose to open the totals with precise 47 which is the algorithmic calculation of the line (95.1/2, or 27.65 - 19.9), And even that is half a point less than it should have been. Why? Because it is going to go under due to the lack of offensive options for the browns. The dichotomy produced by the Browns having one of the best offensive lines staff wise and at the same time having one of the worse pass protection and overall offense that is ranked only 25th - will continue tonight. But at least tonight it may be justified by the absences.

This game can have only two following scenarios from the Vegas perspective - or the Browns cover and, since to do that they will have to score enough for the Over to happen... Or the Under dictated by the O/U records of the teams (no one really wants in Vegas or the NFL headquarters to have 8-1 and 6-2 Over teams) will also be a key to the Bengals covering -13.

I will choose the later in a milder form at first.

This is a 5 Units Play

CIN Bengals -7  First Half -110    550$

should have followed on my own advise........ strange kind of a demon..... wow....

anyway - that was loss  -550$

only good thing about this pick besides winning the under is actually my own stat that after losing the first pick of the week - the vengeance follows
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 2602
Posted: #47
Thank you.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 4174
Posted: #48
Quote Originally Posted by phixer:

NFL Week 9: TNF CIN Bengals vs CLE Browns Totals

This is a 5 Units Play

Under 45.5  -110   550$

win +500$
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 4174
Posted: #49
1-1 to begin the week with.  -50$

55 - 36 - 4  nfl  +12,245$
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1971
Posted: #50
WoW what a finish thank you johnny man he looks like a lost puppy but after that smashing hit on him he did not want to get smacked again 

Phixer again thank you for sharing should of been 2-0will take the 1-1 but i must say i played the under in the 2nd haif 23.5 and im sure alot of people did the same thing  
All Forums | Website Promotions
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.