HOW DO YOU BET ALL THOSE PICKS??? IF YOU ARE A HUNDRED DOLLAR BETER YOU WOULD HAVE TO RISK 4100.00 DOLLARS TODAY ....LOL .... I THINK YOUR COMPUTER PICKING SYSTEM THINGY IS ON TILT , IT IS CHASING LIKE A MOFO .. JUST LIKE A REAL LOSER .... GOOD LUCK WITH THAT ....PM ME WHEN THE PRICE GOES TO 35.00 A MONTH
What's funnier is that you probably don't have a $4100 bankroll.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Lsports:
HOW DO YOU BET ALL THOSE PICKS??? IF YOU ARE A HUNDRED DOLLAR BETER YOU WOULD HAVE TO RISK 4100.00 DOLLARS TODAY ....LOL .... I THINK YOUR COMPUTER PICKING SYSTEM THINGY IS ON TILT , IT IS CHASING LIKE A MOFO .. JUST LIKE A REAL LOSER .... GOOD LUCK WITH THAT ....PM ME WHEN THE PRICE GOES TO 35.00 A MONTH
What's funnier is that you probably don't have a $4100 bankroll.
2 picks which are losers because the line is listed at "0" were never changed to losers. They remain listed as winners (Wisconsin/Michigan OVER and Toledo ATS tonight).
0
-1055 for February.
2 picks which are losers because the line is listed at "0" were never changed to losers. They remain listed as winners (Wisconsin/Michigan OVER and Toledo ATS tonight).
I dont think its ever a good idea to release 53 plays in one day ever.. I think the guys here are trying to win but a few observations. If you go throught the lines on every game that they post you will notice that quite a few are dead numbers around their game time release. I noticed on one particular Saturday that 3 o f the games were graded with lines long gone at gametime. So instead of 10-8 you most likely would be 10-10.
I dont believe you can get access to the lines at the number posted. this might shave a % or 2 of the record not sure..
0
I dont think its ever a good idea to release 53 plays in one day ever.. I think the guys here are trying to win but a few observations. If you go throught the lines on every game that they post you will notice that quite a few are dead numbers around their game time release. I noticed on one particular Saturday that 3 o f the games were graded with lines long gone at gametime. So instead of 10-8 you most likely would be 10-10.
I dont believe you can get access to the lines at the number posted. this might shave a % or 2 of the record not sure..
I dont think its ever a good idea to release 53 plays in one day ever.. I think the guys here are trying to win but a few observations. If you go throught the lines on every game that they post you will notice that quite a few are dead numbers around their game time release. I noticed on one particular Saturday that 3 o f the games were graded with lines long gone at gametime. So instead of 10-8 you most likely would be 10-10.
I dont believe you can get access to the lines at the number posted. this might shave a % or 2 of the record not sure..
I made this observation early on, too.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ironman07:
I dont think its ever a good idea to release 53 plays in one day ever.. I think the guys here are trying to win but a few observations. If you go throught the lines on every game that they post you will notice that quite a few are dead numbers around their game time release. I noticed on one particular Saturday that 3 o f the games were graded with lines long gone at gametime. So instead of 10-8 you most likely would be 10-10.
I dont believe you can get access to the lines at the number posted. this might shave a % or 2 of the record not sure..
Ive been on both sides of he numbers. Ive won when VP has lost because i had a better number then he did. When your losing, you only see the negative.
Ride it out, lower your average bet. MONEY MANAGEMENT! itll get better.
He is smoking nba right now so ride it out. college will come around. the numbers dont lie. If you have been following since jan you are still up a ton.
LONG TERM
0
Ive been on both sides of he numbers. Ive won when VP has lost because i had a better number then he did. When your losing, you only see the negative.
Ride it out, lower your average bet. MONEY MANAGEMENT! itll get better.
He is smoking nba right now so ride it out. college will come around. the numbers dont lie. If you have been following since jan you are still up a ton.
the sad thing is.... Even if you faded the system for those 14 days you would only be up 680$.... man bookies make a living off of people like this who bet 100 games a week
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarahJPhilli:
Veripicks Last 14 Days:
-$2815 @ "to win $100" per pick.
2 winning days in those 14.
the sad thing is.... Even if you faded the system for those 14 days you would only be up 680$.... man bookies make a living off of people like this who bet 100 games a week
bigrick - the juice plays is the system getting ready for baseball. They are telling you they would be a play "usually" but the juice is too high. We don't want to play a ton of -300 -240 -175 games in baseball and show a huge winning percentage. I refuse to bet on anything higher than 130.
So if you enjoy laying BIG chalk then those are good plays - Veripicks will not be releasing them though.
We incorporated "fade" plays into our algorithm so it takes those into account when it's making the plays. We didn't like the idea of "fading" the system.
This was about 14 days ago. VP can you undo that update? weve had 2 weeks of getting our asses kicked. that update didnt accompish much of a STEP in the right direction....
prior to that update from what i rememeber. we were liek +1400 on the month. its been like a 5k swing since that update
0
Quote Originally Posted by veripicks:
bigrick - the juice plays is the system getting ready for baseball. They are telling you they would be a play "usually" but the juice is too high. We don't want to play a ton of -300 -240 -175 games in baseball and show a huge winning percentage. I refuse to bet on anything higher than 130.
So if you enjoy laying BIG chalk then those are good plays - Veripicks will not be releasing them though.
We incorporated "fade" plays into our algorithm so it takes those into account when it's making the plays. We didn't like the idea of "fading" the system.
This was about 14 days ago. VP can you undo that update? weve had 2 weeks of getting our asses kicked. that update didnt accompish much of a STEP in the right direction....
prior to that update from what i rememeber. we were liek +1400 on the month. its been like a 5k swing since that update
the sad thing is.... Even if you faded the system for those 14 days you would only be up 680$.... man bookies make a living off of people like this who bet 100 games a week
If you faded the system on those 14 days, you would be UP around $2800.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bigrick2234:
the sad thing is.... Even if you faded the system for those 14 days you would only be up 680$.... man bookies make a living off of people like this who bet 100 games a week
If you faded the system on those 14 days, you would be UP around $2800.
No sarah, Just like more times then none, you are wrong!!
:)
perhaps ill just spell it out for you to show you that you are wrong
last 14 days
102-119 46% -2815
If we flip flopped it (faded it)
we have 119-102 54% +680
Now let me go even further and explain it to you Since you are CLEARly not understanding. Lets just Assume that you are like almost every other better here and are placing bets with a conventional bookie or online site. we pay something called juice on loosing bets.
119x100= 11900 102x110=11220
11900-11220=680
Is this making sense to you? or are you just here to post negaive feedback like the douche that you are?
0
No sarah, Just like more times then none, you are wrong!!
:)
perhaps ill just spell it out for you to show you that you are wrong
last 14 days
102-119 46% -2815
If we flip flopped it (faded it)
we have 119-102 54% +680
Now let me go even further and explain it to you Since you are CLEARly not understanding. Lets just Assume that you are like almost every other better here and are placing bets with a conventional bookie or online site. we pay something called juice on loosing bets.
119x100= 11900 102x110=11220
11900-11220=680
Is this making sense to you? or are you just here to post negaive feedback like the douche that you are?
sara come clean What book do you work for ??? and whats your real name ???? you must think we are all assholes on here .. for us to think that we think you are a girl ... GUYS ITS PLAIN AND SIMPLE SHE IS A HE ... AND HDE WORLS FOR ONE OF THE BOOKS ... HE IS KEEPING AN EYE IN THINGS AROUND HERE ,,, SARA DO ME A FAVOR AND BE OUT WITH YOUR GARBAGE...
0
sara come clean What book do you work for ??? and whats your real name ???? you must think we are all assholes on here .. for us to think that we think you are a girl ... GUYS ITS PLAIN AND SIMPLE SHE IS A HE ... AND HDE WORLS FOR ONE OF THE BOOKS ... HE IS KEEPING AN EYE IN THINGS AROUND HERE ,,, SARA DO ME A FAVOR AND BE OUT WITH YOUR GARBAGE...
No sarah, Just like more times then none, you are wrong!!
:)
perhaps ill just spell it out for you to show you that you are wrong
last 14 days
102-119 46% -2815
If we flip flopped it (faded it)
we have 119-102 54% +680
Now let me go even further and explain it to you Since you are CLEARly not understanding. Lets just Assume that you are like almost every other better here and are placing bets with a conventional bookie or online site. we pay something called juice on loosing bets.
119x100= 11900 102x110=11220
11900-11220=680
Is this making sense to you? or are you just here to post negaive feedback like the douche that you are?
Oh man, my mistake, I have to dumb it down for you:
1) You would not be -2800 (this counts as a "net gain" in my world, IE: not losing money).
2) If you want to count what you WOULD be up, then you are actually making it worse: you wouldn't have lost $2800, and you would have profited $600-$700, meaning you are +$3400 to +$3500 compared to playing Veripicks plays.
Good job though.
Your avatar is 100% correct: you're an ass.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bigrick2234:
No sarah, Just like more times then none, you are wrong!!
:)
perhaps ill just spell it out for you to show you that you are wrong
last 14 days
102-119 46% -2815
If we flip flopped it (faded it)
we have 119-102 54% +680
Now let me go even further and explain it to you Since you are CLEARly not understanding. Lets just Assume that you are like almost every other better here and are placing bets with a conventional bookie or online site. we pay something called juice on loosing bets.
119x100= 11900 102x110=11220
11900-11220=680
Is this making sense to you? or are you just here to post negaive feedback like the douche that you are?
Oh man, my mistake, I have to dumb it down for you:
1) You would not be -2800 (this counts as a "net gain" in my world, IE: not losing money).
2) If you want to count what you WOULD be up, then you are actually making it worse: you wouldn't have lost $2800, and you would have profited $600-$700, meaning you are +$3400 to +$3500 compared to playing Veripicks plays.
sara come clean What book do you work for ??? and whats your real name ???? you must think we are all assholes on here .. for us to think that we think you are a girl ... GUYS ITS PLAIN AND SIMPLE SHE IS A HE ... AND HDE WORLS FOR ONE OF THE BOOKS ... HE IS KEEPING AN EYE IN THINGS AROUND HERE ,,, SARA DO ME A FAVOR AND BE OUT WITH YOUR GARBAGE...
LOL.
E-Mail Jason Logan at Covers and ask him if I'm a woman since I blog for this website, imbecile.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Lsports:
sara come clean What book do you work for ??? and whats your real name ???? you must think we are all assholes on here .. for us to think that we think you are a girl ... GUYS ITS PLAIN AND SIMPLE SHE IS A HE ... AND HDE WORLS FOR ONE OF THE BOOKS ... HE IS KEEPING AN EYE IN THINGS AROUND HERE ,,, SARA DO ME A FAVOR AND BE OUT WITH YOUR GARBAGE...
LOL.
E-Mail Jason Logan at Covers and ask him if I'm a woman since I blog for this website, imbecile.
If you did not play a single game at all you would be at 0$ which is +2800 on veripicks. but not quite UP $2800. Most people would assume that up 2800 is +2800.
Now going on what you said, IF you FADED veripicks you would have a positive gain of 680$.
so... please tell me how you are right and im wrong? because the math i learned in 3rd grade is telling me that im right... maybe your experience as a covers blogger and your math degree could point me in the right direction?
0
The Fact is
If you did not play a single game at all you would be at 0$ which is +2800 on veripicks. but not quite UP $2800. Most people would assume that up 2800 is +2800.
Now going on what you said, IF you FADED veripicks you would have a positive gain of 680$.
so... please tell me how you are right and im wrong? because the math i learned in 3rd grade is telling me that im right... maybe your experience as a covers blogger and your math degree could point me in the right direction?
If you did not play a single game at all you would be at 0$ which is +2800 on veripicks. but not quite UP $2800. Most people would assume that up 2800 is +2800.
Now going on what you said, IF you FADED veripicks you would have a positive gain of 680$.
so... please tell me how you are right and im wrong? because the math i learned in 3rd grade is telling me that im right... maybe your experience as a covers blogger and your math degree could point me in the right direction?
This isn't worth my time. You're the same guy who asked for a free day pass, you bum.
Veripicks: 1-1 so far today.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bigrick2234:
The Fact is
If you did not play a single game at all you would be at 0$ which is +2800 on veripicks. but not quite UP $2800. Most people would assume that up 2800 is +2800.
Now going on what you said, IF you FADED veripicks you would have a positive gain of 680$.
so... please tell me how you are right and im wrong? because the math i learned in 3rd grade is telling me that im right... maybe your experience as a covers blogger and your math degree could point me in the right direction?
This isn't worth my time. You're the same guy who asked for a free day pass, you bum.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.