Early Concerns Emerge About Alabama’s Big Sports Betting and Gambling Bill

An Alabama House committee heard a variety of issues taken with gambling legislation on Tuesday, including its potential impact on mental health and the existing gaming operations of the Poarch Band of Creek Indians.

Geoff Zochodne - Senior News Analyst at Covers.com
Geoff Zochodne • Senior News Analyst
Feb 13, 2024 • 20:06 ET • 3 min read
Mark Sears Alabama Crimson Tide NCAAB
Photo By - USA TODAY Sports

The sweeping gambling legislation proposed in Alabama is not going to pass without some local resistance — if it passes at all.

Members of the Alabama House of Representatives' economic development and tourism committee met Tuesday and considered the recently proposed House Bills 151 and 152.

The bills lay out a path for the southern state to legalize sports betting and several other forms of gambling.

H.B. 151 proposes an amendment to the Alabama constitution that, if approved by voters, would authorize a state lottery, additional casinos, sports wagering, raffles, and bingo. H.B. 152 provides more detail about Alabama’s proposed gambling expansion, including the potential to license multiple sportsbook operators for in-person and online wagering. 

No action was taken on either piece of legislation on Tuesday, but the committee will meet again on Wednesday. Members also heard testimony from 20 witnesses, including a sponsor of the two bills, Republican Rep. Chris Blackshear. 

“It's been a quarter of a century since the last time the citizens got to express their opinion on this matter in the state of Alabama,” Blackshear told the committee. “Bill Clinton was president."

Blackshear also noted that updated fiscal projections for the proposed gaming expansion forecast between $935.6 million to $1.214 billion in new revenue annually, $15 million to $41.5 million of which would come from legal sports betting. 

But opposition is already forming to the gambling bills. The House committee heard a variety of issues taken with the legislation on Tuesday, including its potential impact on mental health and the existing gaming operations of the Poarch Band of Creek Indians, the only federally recognized tribe in Alabama.

Alabama Policy Institute CEO Stephanie Smith warned the committee about the power the new gaming commission would have under the legislation to locate casinos.

“That puts every single municipality and every single county at risk for having a casino in their backyard,” Smith said. “It also handpicks winners and losers and only designates an absolutely tiny amount to combating problem gambling.” 

To share profit, one first needs profit

Robert McGhee, vice chairman for the Poarch Band, said they have “real concerns” about the legislation. The bills would allow the governor to negotiate a gaming compact with the tribe that could permit the Poarch Band to expand its casino offerings and that would guarantee payments to the state. 

McGhee ran out of time before he could dig into the specifics of their concerns. However, the Alabama Political Reporter cited a source on Monday who said the tribe and local racetrack owners are interested in a provision giving them the right to make the last and best bid for the additional casino licenses.

“It's estimated that a compact would bring the state millions of dollars, 300 total as was stated here, but millions of dollars just within the first year,” McGhee told the committee on Tuesday. “But we can only do that massive amount of profit sharing if we are able to actually increase our profits.”

Stop me if you've heard this one...

On the sports betting front, though, Alabama lawmakers are getting a familiar pitch: it’s already happening. 

FanDuel President Christian Genetski told the committee that there were two million attempts to wager with legal sportsbooks in Alabama last year but those attempts were blocked, as the state remains one of 12 that has not authorized event wagering. Some of those people then took their betting business to a neighboring state or an offshore site.

“Alabama remains stuck with only illegal and unsafe sports betting websites that operate offshore, untaxed, and without any regulation or oversight,” Genetski said.

Google News
Stay updated with the latest picks, odds, and news! Tap the star to add us to your favorites on Google News to never miss a story.

Pages related to this topic

Geoff Zochodne, Covers Sports Betting Journalist
Senior News Analyst

Geoff has been writing about the legalization and regulation of sports betting in Canada and the United States for more than three years. His work has included coverage of launches in New York, Ohio, and Ontario, numerous court proceedings, and the decriminalization of single-game wagering by Canadian lawmakers. As an expert on the growing online gambling industry in North America, Geoff has appeared on and been cited by publications and networks such as Axios, TSN Radio, and VSiN. Prior to joining Covers, he spent 10 years as a journalist reporting on business and politics, including a stint at the Ontario legislature. More recently, Geoff’s work has focused on the pending launch of a competitive iGaming market in Alberta, the evolution of major companies within the gambling industry, and efforts by U.S. state regulators to rein in offshore activity and college player prop betting.

Popular Content

Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo