Final Jan 8
L-MD 72 3.0 o140.0
ARMY 74 -3.0 u140.0
Final Jan 8
NAVY 59 2.5 o140.5
HC 70 -2.5 u140.5
Final Jan 8
CCAR 51 7.5 o126.0
APP 74 -7.5 u126.0
Final Jan 8
L-IL 79 -2.0 o148.0
LAS 68 2.0 u148.0
Final Jan 8
NKU 61 2.5 o136.0
YSU 72 -2.5 u136.0
Final Jan 8
CONN 66 1.0 o142.0
VILL 68 -1.0 u142.0
Final OT Jan 8
DEP 80 2.5 o133.0
HALL 85 -2.5 u133.0
Final Jan 8
TEM 79 3.5 o145.5
ECU 80 -3.5 u145.5
Final Jan 8
MISS 73 3.5 o148.5
ARK 66 -3.5 u148.5
Final Jan 8
MURR 71 5.5 o138.0
UNI 68 -5.5 u138.0
Final Jan 8
DAY 72 -10.5 o147.5
MASS 76 10.5 u147.5
Final OT Jan 8
JOES 81 -3.0 o134.0
DUQ 85 3.0 u134.0
Final Jan 8
LEH 62 6.5 o138.5
COLG 67 -6.5 u138.5
Final Jan 8
FSU 80 2.5 o152.5
MIA 65 -2.5 u152.5
Final Jan 8
FOR 61 17.0 o145.0
VCU 73 -17.0 u145.0
Final Jan 8
HP 93 -8.5 o153.5
CHSO 79 8.5 u153.5
Final Jan 8
CLEV 80 2.0 o139.5
RMU 69 -2.0 u139.5
Final Jan 8
UNCA 76 4.0 o153.5
LONG 85 -4.0 u153.5
Final Jan 8
GW 75 6.0 o152.0
URI 67 -6.0 u152.0
Final Jan 8
ND 65 2.5 o138.5
NCST 66 -2.5 u138.5
Final Jan 8
RICH 58 11.5 o130.0
GMU 64 -11.5 u130.0
Final Jan 8
ALA 88 -11.5 o157.0
SCAR 68 11.5 u157.0
Final Jan 8
WCU 69 12.5 o144.5
WOF 77 -12.5 u144.5
Final Jan 8
AMER 54 3.0 o124.5
BU 60 -3.0 u124.5
Final Jan 8
USC 69 6.0 o149.0
IND 82 -6.0 u149.0
Final Jan 8
DRKE 64 1.5 o126.5
BRAD 57 -1.5 u126.5
Final Jan 8
WIN 83 -3.5 o159.5
WEBB 89 3.5 u159.5
Final Jan 8
COLO 74 6.0 o149.0
UCF 75 -6.0 u149.0
Final Jan 8
PRE 67 -3.5 o148.0
SCUS 77 3.5 u148.0
Final Jan 8
FAU 75 -5.5 o154.0
CHAR 64 5.5 u154.0
Final Jan 8
ETSU 70 -2.0 o151.5
MER 68 2.0 u151.5
Final OT Jan 8
FUR 67 -14.0 o138.0
CIT 63 14.0 u138.0
Final Jan 8
MILW 73 3.0 o155.5
IPFW 78 -3.0 u155.5
Final OT Jan 8
LAF 62 3.5 o131.5
BUCK 65 -3.5 u131.5
Final Jan 8
SIU 86 9.5 o156.0
BEL 90 -9.5 u156.0
Final OT Jan 8
INST 95 1.5 o162.0
VALP 98 -1.5 u162.0
Final Jan 8
ILST 51 -5.5 o130.5
EVAN 69 5.5 u130.5
Final Jan 8
SBON 68 3.5 o141.5
SLU 73 -3.5 u141.5
Final Jan 8
BUT 65 3.0 o137.0
PROV 84 -3.0 u137.0
Final OT Jan 8
GASO 78 3.0 o155.0
GAST 82 -3.0 u155.0
Final Jan 8
ASU 55 14.0 o144.5
KU 74 -14.0 u144.5
Final Jan 8
UMKC 58 1.5 o137.5
NEOM 77 -1.5 u137.5
Final Jan 8
PSU 52 7.0 o163.0
ILL 91 -7.0 u163.0
Final Jan 8
TAM 80 2.5 o147.0
OKLA 78 -2.5 u147.0
Final Jan 8
VT 59 9.0 o142.5
STAN 70 -9.0 u142.5
Final Jan 8
SDST 72 2.0 o156.0
STT 73 -2.0 u156.0
Final Jan 8
USD 80 31.5 o157.0
GONZ 93 -31.5 u157.0
Final Jan 8
RICE 59 11.0 o122.5
UNT 81 -11.0 u122.5
Final Jan 8
AFA 38 18.5 o130.0
SDSU 67 -18.5 u130.0
Final Jan 8
UVA 61 4.0 o128.5
CAL 75 -4.0 u128.5
Virginia Tech 13th ACC6-9
Stanford 10th ACC10-5

Virginia Tech @ Stanford preview

Maples Pavilion

Virginia Tech and Stanford have lived up to expectations so far during Atlantic Coast Conference play.

Problem is, neither squad was projected to do much damage against league foes.

Both teams will try to reach .500 in conference play when the Hokies visit the Cardinal on Wednesday.

This season's ACC preseason poll stretched out to 18 teams after Stanford, Cal and SMU joined the league. After going the previous six seasons without a winning record in Pac-12 play, the Cardinal were forecast to finish second-to-last in their first ACC campaign.

Stanford (9-5, 1-2) started conference play strong under first-year coach Kyle Smith, posting an 89-81 win over former Pac-12 rival Cal in both schools' first game as members of their new conference.

But the Cardinal failed their first two tests against the league's more seasoned members, falling 85-71 at Clemson last Wednesday before ending up on the wrong end of an 83-68 decision at Pittsburgh on Saturday.

"I think there's a lot of pride in (the) programs," Smith said, referring to what he's learned about the ACC. "The opportunity to compete in this league and this level is a challenge. Pretty excited about it."

Picked to finish 14th in the conference in the preseason poll, Virginia Tech (6-8, 1-2) has faced a more challenging slate than Stanford.

The Hokies began league play against two ranked teams, losing 64-59 to then-No. 18 Pitt ahead of an 88-65 setback against No. 4 Duke. They grabbed their first ACC victory on Saturday by beating Miami 86-85, getting a game-winning three-point play from Mylyjael Poteat in the final seconds of regulation.

"Needed it bad," Virginia Tech coach Mike Young said of the victory against Miami. "Now let's take this and improve and make it better."

Poteat, a graduate student, posted a career-high 25 points against the Hurricanes and is second on the team in scoring (10.9 points per game) behind Tobi Lawal (12.1).

Both players will try to limit 7-foot-1 Stanford star Maxime Raynaud, who entered Tuesday with the 10th-best scoring average (20.9 points per game) in Division I and was tied for third in the nation with 11.4 rebounds per game.

--Field Level Media

Pages Related to This Topic