Sorry fellas i posted my day 2 LAst Man Standing picks on anoher post FORGOT the title of this one and it didn't pop up early...
...the Whistle is still picking the winners and making leads disappear,hopefully next week things will change....
So first I will comment on the ND (-1.5) SF Austin posters make solid points.....But truth is SFA is solid also this is a pretty good play with 2 point SFA..> ND struggled vs a weak young michigan team. However, Notre dame is the National teamand probably will get the Favorable whistle. yes SFA doesnt have only 1 great win WVa &...1 great player. Walkups . It is true ND spreads it around.....So does UCONN I was told.....GONE! The style matchup was well coached and WVa best weapon became its worst enemy, as SFA attacked the press until WVa gave up pressing.....
NOW FOR MY last man Standing pick for sunday.... ( so under the contest rules you play till you lose and split the pot ($52,000+) only 611 left......Stations contest. I bought 2 cards. my A card remains....lost my B card as Miami didn't cover.... TOdays pick was Va I posted somewhere on covers, not sure where it landed.
SUNDAY I am split between the Sooners and the Tx AM Aggies.. I am taking the Aggies as my best play!
#1 Biggest variance in ranking from 3 sources of the 8 games.A&M is top 20 , while NIowa is still in the mid 60's. #2 N Iowa mid court shot.....all luck....back in their minds they know they had lost. And now so have the Shockers. #3. Only SEC team left now that KY is gone. NIowa is no Indiana! and KY only won tourney due to OT! #4. 4 Seniors starters no in experience disadvantage #5. Size advantage front and back court.... #6 Off versus NI's def. looks like +3 #7 Def vs NI Off looks 6 better #8 A&M had only 3 losses when their 6-10 forward was charged with DUI by campus security, they then lost 4 in early Feb over this. ( so I think they are better than their record with Morrales in the line-up.
I must lay 6.5 with TX A&M or OK ( but won't know till after 7 am PDT....if its more I will go with the home team Sooners.as my back-up..against a small and overrated east coast bias team VCU.) best wins out of conference Buffy and @ Mid Tenn ranked 128 & 106 at the time respectively..... I am unimpressed.
0
Sorry fellas i posted my day 2 LAst Man Standing picks on anoher post FORGOT the title of this one and it didn't pop up early...
...the Whistle is still picking the winners and making leads disappear,hopefully next week things will change....
So first I will comment on the ND (-1.5) SF Austin posters make solid points.....But truth is SFA is solid also this is a pretty good play with 2 point SFA..> ND struggled vs a weak young michigan team. However, Notre dame is the National teamand probably will get the Favorable whistle. yes SFA doesnt have only 1 great win WVa &...1 great player. Walkups . It is true ND spreads it around.....So does UCONN I was told.....GONE! The style matchup was well coached and WVa best weapon became its worst enemy, as SFA attacked the press until WVa gave up pressing.....
NOW FOR MY last man Standing pick for sunday.... ( so under the contest rules you play till you lose and split the pot ($52,000+) only 611 left......Stations contest. I bought 2 cards. my A card remains....lost my B card as Miami didn't cover.... TOdays pick was Va I posted somewhere on covers, not sure where it landed.
SUNDAY I am split between the Sooners and the Tx AM Aggies.. I am taking the Aggies as my best play!
#1 Biggest variance in ranking from 3 sources of the 8 games.A&M is top 20 , while NIowa is still in the mid 60's. #2 N Iowa mid court shot.....all luck....back in their minds they know they had lost. And now so have the Shockers. #3. Only SEC team left now that KY is gone. NIowa is no Indiana! and KY only won tourney due to OT! #4. 4 Seniors starters no in experience disadvantage #5. Size advantage front and back court.... #6 Off versus NI's def. looks like +3 #7 Def vs NI Off looks 6 better #8 A&M had only 3 losses when their 6-10 forward was charged with DUI by campus security, they then lost 4 in early Feb over this. ( so I think they are better than their record with Morrales in the line-up.
I must lay 6.5 with TX A&M or OK ( but won't know till after 7 am PDT....if its more I will go with the home team Sooners.as my back-up..against a small and overrated east coast bias team VCU.) best wins out of conference Buffy and @ Mid Tenn ranked 128 & 106 at the time respectively..... I am unimpressed.
I had listed and elaborated on 7 reasons why I like NOVA
and then lost what I typed when I clicked on another Covers heading.
This time I'll just sum it up.
1. Game site much closer to home. 2. Much better overall record. 3. Iowa has lost 5 of last 7, incl losses to Penn St and Illinois. 4. Nova has #20 defense, giving up only 63 ppg. 5. Last 5 games, Iowa shooting under 40% and Nova shooting 50% against equal or better competition. 6. Friday, Nova coasted with 30 point win and Iowa squeaked by with a 2 point OT win. 7. Except for Indiana, Big Ten has been a major disappointment.
I
expect Nova to win the game handily, 77-64. There are 6.5's out
there. I bought it down to 6, but would have played it at 7. I also
played the under for a lesser amount. I realize this is not an
"in-depth" analysis, but sometimes the obvious just jumps out at you.
There is no reason to believe that Iowa is going to all of a sudden
revert back to some allegedly "good Iowa." Iowa is not good. I'll take
my chances with the #2 seed against a mediocre Big Ten team.
$$$$ Villanova -6.5 $$$$
0
$$$$ Villanova -6.5 $$$$
I had listed and elaborated on 7 reasons why I like NOVA
and then lost what I typed when I clicked on another Covers heading.
This time I'll just sum it up.
1. Game site much closer to home. 2. Much better overall record. 3. Iowa has lost 5 of last 7, incl losses to Penn St and Illinois. 4. Nova has #20 defense, giving up only 63 ppg. 5. Last 5 games, Iowa shooting under 40% and Nova shooting 50% against equal or better competition. 6. Friday, Nova coasted with 30 point win and Iowa squeaked by with a 2 point OT win. 7. Except for Indiana, Big Ten has been a major disappointment.
I
expect Nova to win the game handily, 77-64. There are 6.5's out
there. I bought it down to 6, but would have played it at 7. I also
played the under for a lesser amount. I realize this is not an
"in-depth" analysis, but sometimes the obvious just jumps out at you.
There is no reason to believe that Iowa is going to all of a sudden
revert back to some allegedly "good Iowa." Iowa is not good. I'll take
my chances with the #2 seed against a mediocre Big Ten team.
Hey Bubba Love Your thread only one I look at anymore. I dont see your Sunday thread up so putting this in right now for Sunday.
This play is totally statistics based on past games. History tells me the answer but keep in mind history is history and if only we had tomorrows paper.
Xavier vs Wisconsin facts
Xavier avg 81 ppg and allow 70.5 diff 10.5
Wisc avg 68.2 ppg and allow 63.9 ppg diff 5.7
Strictly based on this Xavier should win 73 to 69 so spread is right and ttl points should be around 142 for posted ttl
Looking further though
Wisc shoots 42.6% from 2 point range with 54.6 2 point shots pg
Xavier shoots 45.3% from 2 point range based on 60.6 shots pg
Xavier drives and gets to the FT line 5 more times per game than Wisc and averages 73.2 % compared to 70 % We all know FT % at the end of the game generally decides the outcome.
Wisc does shoot 2 less 3 point shots per game which to me in 2nd day is important. However the fact that Xavier gets to the line 5 more times per game tells me they are not just jacking 3s which can work in opening round. They are driving to get to the hole which creates fouls.
Other key factors are Xavier outrebounds Wisc on the offensive glass by 2 per game. Xavier holds their opponents to lower shooting % in every category.
The one negative for Xavier is being favorite by 4 points. I am very careful taking favorites and prefer getting points in March Madness. Statisticly speaking without any other factors involved Xavier is the better team on paper.
I will use a $$$$$ on Xavier -4. I think they will force the tempo and take Wisconsin out of their game plan by creating pressure on them to score points....Xavier has more depth. This will be a tough physical game. You might think that plays into Wisc favor. Xavier has the big guys and depth to slug it out and win.
I welcome feedback. If you dont think I am right fade me. You might just be right. We will find out later this afternoon. This is goin
0
SUNDAY PLAY $$$$$ XAVIER -4
Hey Bubba Love Your thread only one I look at anymore. I dont see your Sunday thread up so putting this in right now for Sunday.
This play is totally statistics based on past games. History tells me the answer but keep in mind history is history and if only we had tomorrows paper.
Xavier vs Wisconsin facts
Xavier avg 81 ppg and allow 70.5 diff 10.5
Wisc avg 68.2 ppg and allow 63.9 ppg diff 5.7
Strictly based on this Xavier should win 73 to 69 so spread is right and ttl points should be around 142 for posted ttl
Looking further though
Wisc shoots 42.6% from 2 point range with 54.6 2 point shots pg
Xavier shoots 45.3% from 2 point range based on 60.6 shots pg
Xavier drives and gets to the FT line 5 more times per game than Wisc and averages 73.2 % compared to 70 % We all know FT % at the end of the game generally decides the outcome.
Wisc does shoot 2 less 3 point shots per game which to me in 2nd day is important. However the fact that Xavier gets to the line 5 more times per game tells me they are not just jacking 3s which can work in opening round. They are driving to get to the hole which creates fouls.
Other key factors are Xavier outrebounds Wisc on the offensive glass by 2 per game. Xavier holds their opponents to lower shooting % in every category.
The one negative for Xavier is being favorite by 4 points. I am very careful taking favorites and prefer getting points in March Madness. Statisticly speaking without any other factors involved Xavier is the better team on paper.
I will use a $$$$$ on Xavier -4. I think they will force the tempo and take Wisconsin out of their game plan by creating pressure on them to score points....Xavier has more depth. This will be a tough physical game. You might think that plays into Wisc favor. Xavier has the big guys and depth to slug it out and win.
I welcome feedback. If you dont think I am right fade me. You might just be right. We will find out later this afternoon. This is goin
This is a classic 1st
round upset followed by a 2nd round dud from SFA.
ND plays in the ACC. SFA comes out of
the Southland Conference. During the regular season, ND had 5
impressive wins beating Duke (twice), N. Carolina, Iowa, and Louisville. While
SFA didn't beat any good teams, they did finish 18-0 in the
Southland.
Round of 64
How did SFA upset WVU?
SFA's senior forward Thomas Walkup
scored 33 of SFA's 70 points. The bulk of his points came from the
foul line where he made 19-20. He also went 2-3 from beyond the arc.
This was a surprising performance. His only other breakout game against a decent team this
year was scoring 30 in a loss to N. Iowa.
Walkup averaged 18 pts per game this
year and shot 27% from 3.
SFA's other four starters combined for
14 points against WVU.
How did ND upset Michigan?
ND fought it's way back from an 11 pt
halftime deficit. The starters combined for 53 of the team's 70
points. ND has won with balanced scoring this year with 4 of 5 of
their starters averaging double digits. Their 6th man
Colson also averages double digits.
In their wins over ranked opponents,
they have had balanced scoring. What's more impressive is their
ability to hang in tough games. They rallied from halftime
deficits this year to defeat Duke twice, N. Carolina, and Louisville.
I like that kind of grittiness.
For SFA to win this game, they would need another unbelievable performance from Walkup. And they would need to pile up
points from the foul line, which they don't normally do. Against WVU, the Lumberjacks got to the
free throw line 39 times and made 29. I don't see that happening
again. Also, WVU shot the ball poorly---31 % from the field and 19%
from three. As a team this season WVU averaged 45% FG and 33% from
three.
SFA made it to the dance and scored a
big upset. Good for them. But I think they're done now. A lot of
things went right for them against WVU. However, against this battle
tested ND team, the stars won't align for them again.
$$$ ND -1.5 $$$
West Virginia much better defensively than ND u might want to consider that also
0
Quote Originally Posted by barnone:
Stephen F Austin v Notre Dame
This is a classic 1st
round upset followed by a 2nd round dud from SFA.
ND plays in the ACC. SFA comes out of
the Southland Conference. During the regular season, ND had 5
impressive wins beating Duke (twice), N. Carolina, Iowa, and Louisville. While
SFA didn't beat any good teams, they did finish 18-0 in the
Southland.
Round of 64
How did SFA upset WVU?
SFA's senior forward Thomas Walkup
scored 33 of SFA's 70 points. The bulk of his points came from the
foul line where he made 19-20. He also went 2-3 from beyond the arc.
This was a surprising performance. His only other breakout game against a decent team this
year was scoring 30 in a loss to N. Iowa.
Walkup averaged 18 pts per game this
year and shot 27% from 3.
SFA's other four starters combined for
14 points against WVU.
How did ND upset Michigan?
ND fought it's way back from an 11 pt
halftime deficit. The starters combined for 53 of the team's 70
points. ND has won with balanced scoring this year with 4 of 5 of
their starters averaging double digits. Their 6th man
Colson also averages double digits.
In their wins over ranked opponents,
they have had balanced scoring. What's more impressive is their
ability to hang in tough games. They rallied from halftime
deficits this year to defeat Duke twice, N. Carolina, and Louisville.
I like that kind of grittiness.
For SFA to win this game, they would need another unbelievable performance from Walkup. And they would need to pile up
points from the foul line, which they don't normally do. Against WVU, the Lumberjacks got to the
free throw line 39 times and made 29. I don't see that happening
again. Also, WVU shot the ball poorly---31 % from the field and 19%
from three. As a team this season WVU averaged 45% FG and 33% from
three.
SFA made it to the dance and scored a
big upset. Good for them. But I think they're done now. A lot of
things went right for them against WVU. However, against this battle
tested ND team, the stars won't align for them again.
$$$ ND -1.5 $$$
West Virginia much better defensively than ND u might want to consider that also
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.