I got a tad lucky picking against the Ivy league on Wednesday in taking Virginia Tech over Princeton. I liked how they matched up and the fact they were at home. I thought they would be hungry and eager to play deep into the NIT, yet Princeton held on very admirably the whole game. For whatever reason, Virginia Tech offense played very tight. In the end, lucky to get the 5 point win and cover.
So on to Yale. Why tempt fate and bet against Ivy league again?!? What kind of fool am I? Well, depending on who you ask the answer will vary. I do like Baylor matchup wise though.
Baylor is a team that has a fair share of upperclassmen. They really got a bitter taste in their mouths when they lost to Georgia St last year on a last second shot. I mean, that game decimated that bunch. A lot of times, a veteran team that loses in that way will bounce back the next year with a desire for revenge and redemption.
Also, there is a serious mismatch in size and athleticism. Baylor is leaps and bounds better in physicality and athleticism. Size advantage is big. When Yale's best impact player is 6'8 down low, that can be a problem. In my opinion, Baylor is going to open a can of Big-12 whoop-behind on Yale in this edge and really cause a problem.
I guess we will see what the Ivy league is made of tomorrow morning. Princeton played very tough but lost in the end. I think Yale will play hard but lose by double digits to a Baylor team that is lengthy, athletic, and motivated to move past the first round yet again.
$$$$ Baylor -5 $$$$
0
$$$$ Baylor -5 $$$$
Bring it over to a Big-12 sluggerfest special.
I got a tad lucky picking against the Ivy league on Wednesday in taking Virginia Tech over Princeton. I liked how they matched up and the fact they were at home. I thought they would be hungry and eager to play deep into the NIT, yet Princeton held on very admirably the whole game. For whatever reason, Virginia Tech offense played very tight. In the end, lucky to get the 5 point win and cover.
So on to Yale. Why tempt fate and bet against Ivy league again?!? What kind of fool am I? Well, depending on who you ask the answer will vary. I do like Baylor matchup wise though.
Baylor is a team that has a fair share of upperclassmen. They really got a bitter taste in their mouths when they lost to Georgia St last year on a last second shot. I mean, that game decimated that bunch. A lot of times, a veteran team that loses in that way will bounce back the next year with a desire for revenge and redemption.
Also, there is a serious mismatch in size and athleticism. Baylor is leaps and bounds better in physicality and athleticism. Size advantage is big. When Yale's best impact player is 6'8 down low, that can be a problem. In my opinion, Baylor is going to open a can of Big-12 whoop-behind on Yale in this edge and really cause a problem.
I guess we will see what the Ivy league is made of tomorrow morning. Princeton played very tough but lost in the end. I think Yale will play hard but lose by double digits to a Baylor team that is lengthy, athletic, and motivated to move past the first round yet again.
Sorry to get way ahead of my skiis here, but I would like to also submit my Friday $$$ play early because I think I could be out of town the next couple days. I like this play though and have confidence in submitting it early.
Oklahoma Sooners face off against an upstart division 1 Cal St. Bakersfield who upset New Mexico St. in a crazy WAC title game on a last second 3 pointer. Props to them, it was only a matter of time as the team has indeed improved. Unfortunately for Bakersfield though, I think they match up rather horribly versus Oklahoma.
I mean, it truly comes down to size. Cal St. Bakersfield really only has one guy who plays solid minutes that demands a bit of respect in the paint. Aly Ahmed is decent, but he will be overwhelmed with the size that Oklahoma brings at him for 40 minutes. If he gets in foul trouble, then oh my god, watch out. Game over in my opinion. Even if he can play 30+ minutes this is the kind of advantage that I see Oklahoma exploiting. Take him out of the lineup and Bakersfield has ZERO size at all.
Bakersfield is an okay offensive team but has won most of their games with defense. Sadly, this likely is not going to go well versus Oklahoma who has a nice athletic and good shooting offense and one of the top 3 best players in division 1 basketball. They struggled a bit in Big-12 tourney play, but I have a feeling they will bust out versus an over matched Bakersfield squad that is lacking in size and speed.
Hield *should* have open season to do whatever he wants. I think Oklahoma can name their score in this game. A victory of > 20 would not surprise me in the least. I am not sure why the spread is only 14 to be honest. I realize I am not the greatest capper out there, so I welcome input to counter my bet with Oklahoma -14.
$$$$ Oklahoma -14 $$$$
0
$$$$ Oklahoma -14 $$$$
Sorry to get way ahead of my skiis here, but I would like to also submit my Friday $$$ play early because I think I could be out of town the next couple days. I like this play though and have confidence in submitting it early.
Oklahoma Sooners face off against an upstart division 1 Cal St. Bakersfield who upset New Mexico St. in a crazy WAC title game on a last second 3 pointer. Props to them, it was only a matter of time as the team has indeed improved. Unfortunately for Bakersfield though, I think they match up rather horribly versus Oklahoma.
I mean, it truly comes down to size. Cal St. Bakersfield really only has one guy who plays solid minutes that demands a bit of respect in the paint. Aly Ahmed is decent, but he will be overwhelmed with the size that Oklahoma brings at him for 40 minutes. If he gets in foul trouble, then oh my god, watch out. Game over in my opinion. Even if he can play 30+ minutes this is the kind of advantage that I see Oklahoma exploiting. Take him out of the lineup and Bakersfield has ZERO size at all.
Bakersfield is an okay offensive team but has won most of their games with defense. Sadly, this likely is not going to go well versus Oklahoma who has a nice athletic and good shooting offense and one of the top 3 best players in division 1 basketball. They struggled a bit in Big-12 tourney play, but I have a feeling they will bust out versus an over matched Bakersfield squad that is lacking in size and speed.
Hield *should* have open season to do whatever he wants. I think Oklahoma can name their score in this game. A victory of > 20 would not surprise me in the least. I am not sure why the spread is only 14 to be honest. I realize I am not the greatest capper out there, so I welcome input to counter my bet with Oklahoma -14.
With the NCAA starting in the morning I wanted to check out covers to see IF, i left any rocks unturned. I have 2 cards for the LAST MAN STANDING..don't have time for 5 five and selectig 1 and OUT and needing to pick 4 or 5 out of a handfull of games....NOT MY STYLE. With this back drop. Here are my Thursday picks. CARD A - I selected Iowa St. -7.5 versus Iona. I know Iona has been a pretty good club and I actually caught a game or so of theirs. But really people Iowa is a solid top 20 team and is battle tested in the BIG 12. ( considered BEST conf. this yr!...?) I make the game 11 points so I have a 3.5 edge. Iona is ranked while Iona is ranked 73, 98 and 97 from 3 different sources.. Iowa St offensively is one of the best, while Iona's D is only slightly better than the average. Iona is to dependent on AJ English and against a quality team he may have trouble getting his 30. So if they clamp down on AJ, is there anyone to take up the slack? Iowa St generally operated under a size disadvantage, but versus Iona they have a slight edge. Iona has lost 10 games and not to the likes of WVa, KA and Ok... Looking for Iowa St to take an early lead and to grind it out to a comfortable place ...over 10-15.
CARD B: Mia FLa -14.5 vs Buffy Buffalo is at a considerable offensive and defensive disadvantage. Offensively I make the Canes 15.5 better than Buffy's defense. Mia Fla defense is another 5 points better than buffalos offense, sum the 2 and I make miaFla 17 better. Mia is ranked 12-14 while buffalo is hovering in the 126-133. Mia FLa ended 3rd n ACC behind 2 # 1 seeds... mia FLa is a team good enough to beat anyone in the tournament so this looks like a blow out to me. The hurricanes H Coach has been here ( Final 4) with much less talent and size...I don't think he will let them coast into the next round, with an experienced club and a few Seniors looking to go out after a deep run. Miami has it all, strong offense, good on the glass, excellent size , and makes Free throws 75%vs 71%, are 4-2 vs top 25. just give me their average game and Card B is "still standing"
Decided against taking YALE +5.5 vs Baylor....> I talked myself into the 2 games aboveas safer plays instead.....So bottom line I will bet Yale tomorrow +6 as i make the game a pick!
Will post in the future if I find the time....
0
With the NCAA starting in the morning I wanted to check out covers to see IF, i left any rocks unturned. I have 2 cards for the LAST MAN STANDING..don't have time for 5 five and selectig 1 and OUT and needing to pick 4 or 5 out of a handfull of games....NOT MY STYLE. With this back drop. Here are my Thursday picks. CARD A - I selected Iowa St. -7.5 versus Iona. I know Iona has been a pretty good club and I actually caught a game or so of theirs. But really people Iowa is a solid top 20 team and is battle tested in the BIG 12. ( considered BEST conf. this yr!...?) I make the game 11 points so I have a 3.5 edge. Iona is ranked while Iona is ranked 73, 98 and 97 from 3 different sources.. Iowa St offensively is one of the best, while Iona's D is only slightly better than the average. Iona is to dependent on AJ English and against a quality team he may have trouble getting his 30. So if they clamp down on AJ, is there anyone to take up the slack? Iowa St generally operated under a size disadvantage, but versus Iona they have a slight edge. Iona has lost 10 games and not to the likes of WVa, KA and Ok... Looking for Iowa St to take an early lead and to grind it out to a comfortable place ...over 10-15.
CARD B: Mia FLa -14.5 vs Buffy Buffalo is at a considerable offensive and defensive disadvantage. Offensively I make the Canes 15.5 better than Buffy's defense. Mia Fla defense is another 5 points better than buffalos offense, sum the 2 and I make miaFla 17 better. Mia is ranked 12-14 while buffalo is hovering in the 126-133. Mia FLa ended 3rd n ACC behind 2 # 1 seeds... mia FLa is a team good enough to beat anyone in the tournament so this looks like a blow out to me. The hurricanes H Coach has been here ( Final 4) with much less talent and size...I don't think he will let them coast into the next round, with an experienced club and a few Seniors looking to go out after a deep run. Miami has it all, strong offense, good on the glass, excellent size , and makes Free throws 75%vs 71%, are 4-2 vs top 25. just give me their average game and Card B is "still standing"
Decided against taking YALE +5.5 vs Baylor....> I talked myself into the 2 games aboveas safer plays instead.....So bottom line I will bet Yale tomorrow +6 as i make the game a pick!
I like your picks forcemajeure, nice thought process for each.
I also think Iowa St. might just surprise this year. People expect them to flame out as always, but this is the year that will likely not happen.
I also would not count out Miami. Not sure ACC deserved two #1 seeds but whatever. They are senior led and should have won the NIT last season. I do not know much about Buffalo though. 14.5 is a lot of points, but this team does seem focused on making a solid final 4 run this year.
I have Baylor -5, but the more I look at it the less I am confident. Playing in Providence will likely result in a lot of folks giving support to the underdog Yale. Yet, the size advantage is fairly extreme.
The more I look at Oklahoma though the more I like that pick. I think they are my pick of the 1st round here.
0
I like your picks forcemajeure, nice thought process for each.
I also think Iowa St. might just surprise this year. People expect them to flame out as always, but this is the year that will likely not happen.
I also would not count out Miami. Not sure ACC deserved two #1 seeds but whatever. They are senior led and should have won the NIT last season. I do not know much about Buffalo though. 14.5 is a lot of points, but this team does seem focused on making a solid final 4 run this year.
I have Baylor -5, but the more I look at it the less I am confident. Playing in Providence will likely result in a lot of folks giving support to the underdog Yale. Yet, the size advantage is fairly extreme.
The more I look at Oklahoma though the more I like that pick. I think they are my pick of the 1st round here.
This $$$$ is for THURSDAY. I will try to remember to re-post this pick in the Thursday thread.
First let me say that I logged on to post this pick and was surprised to find the previous poster with a vastly different opinion. Last week, I posted Notre Dame over Duke in the ACC tournament as one of my $$$$ plays because I questioned Coach K's desire to play 4 games in 4 days in the ACC tournament leading into the NCAA's. Duke laid an egg in that second half and went away in the ACC, not necessarily as planned, but certainly providing the 7 deep rotation a much needed 6 days of rest as opposed to a grueling 4 games in 4 days leading up to the NCAA.
Duke has played the 14th most difficult schedule in the country and, as many may forget, is the defending champion. This is a team that is stocked with McDonalds All Americans that has faced top level competition all season long. On the other bench, UNCW has played a schedule littered with the 130th-200th ranked teams in college basketball. The biggest name on their schedule, a very disappointing 13-16 Georgetown squad, beat them by 10 points. I analyzed the UNCW schedule and could not find a decent team on it. Period. The 25 wins here should be largely discounted due to their 149th ranked strength of schedule.
I did take a moment to read the post above mine and was surprised to see the claim that the length of UNCW would cause Duke problems. I was unaware of UNCW and did not know the starters. What did I find? UNCW starts 4 guards at 6'0", 6'1", 6'5" and 6'5" with a 7' center. Duke counters with 6'2", 6'5", 6'5", 6'9" and 7' Plumlee at center. Thus, if anything, I think it will be UNCW facing a severe height disadvantage at EVERY position vs. a significantly more seasoned opponent than what they are used to seeing.
My final point deals with the pace of play. UNCW will push the pace, but I doubt this will lead to any advantage. Pushing the pace will lead to more possessions per team. Increasing the number of possessions will only widen the Duke advantage. Duke has been playing 7 players for two months with games every few days. They are now coming off 6 days of rest, so I think they will have the legs to run UNCW out of the gym.
I am looking for a Duke 14-16 point win.
My pick is DUKE -10 $$$$
I am on Duke -9.5 - Book it
0
Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63:
This $$$$ is for THURSDAY. I will try to remember to re-post this pick in the Thursday thread.
First let me say that I logged on to post this pick and was surprised to find the previous poster with a vastly different opinion. Last week, I posted Notre Dame over Duke in the ACC tournament as one of my $$$$ plays because I questioned Coach K's desire to play 4 games in 4 days in the ACC tournament leading into the NCAA's. Duke laid an egg in that second half and went away in the ACC, not necessarily as planned, but certainly providing the 7 deep rotation a much needed 6 days of rest as opposed to a grueling 4 games in 4 days leading up to the NCAA.
Duke has played the 14th most difficult schedule in the country and, as many may forget, is the defending champion. This is a team that is stocked with McDonalds All Americans that has faced top level competition all season long. On the other bench, UNCW has played a schedule littered with the 130th-200th ranked teams in college basketball. The biggest name on their schedule, a very disappointing 13-16 Georgetown squad, beat them by 10 points. I analyzed the UNCW schedule and could not find a decent team on it. Period. The 25 wins here should be largely discounted due to their 149th ranked strength of schedule.
I did take a moment to read the post above mine and was surprised to see the claim that the length of UNCW would cause Duke problems. I was unaware of UNCW and did not know the starters. What did I find? UNCW starts 4 guards at 6'0", 6'1", 6'5" and 6'5" with a 7' center. Duke counters with 6'2", 6'5", 6'5", 6'9" and 7' Plumlee at center. Thus, if anything, I think it will be UNCW facing a severe height disadvantage at EVERY position vs. a significantly more seasoned opponent than what they are used to seeing.
My final point deals with the pace of play. UNCW will push the pace, but I doubt this will lead to any advantage. Pushing the pace will lead to more possessions per team. Increasing the number of possessions will only widen the Duke advantage. Duke has been playing 7 players for two months with games every few days. They are now coming off 6 days of rest, so I think they will have the legs to run UNCW out of the gym.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.