@Boss_Up_P
For example:
1. **Austin Peay (224) +3.5 vs Stetson (214)
Austin Peay lost 1 1:00 p.m.
The Austin Peay Kenpom of 224 is within 30 of the Stetson Kenpom of 214.
@Boss_Up_P
For example:
1. **Austin Peay (224) +3.5 vs Stetson (214)
Austin Peay lost 1 1:00 p.m.
The Austin Peay Kenpom of 224 is within 30 of the Stetson Kenpom of 214.
@Boss_Up_P
For example:
1. **Austin Peay (224) +3.5 vs Stetson (214)
Austin Peay lost 1 1:00 p.m.
The Austin Peay Kenpom of 224 is within 30 of the Stetson Kenpom of 214.
@Sladerunningfox
i was down alot today on stentson and garbage indiana state!! ran across your page and said i was gonna try your system out and im glad that i did!! went BIG on idaho st
@Sladerunningfox
i was down alot today on stentson and garbage indiana state!! ran across your page and said i was gonna try your system out and im glad that i did!! went BIG on idaho st
2. Teams that have played each other once or twice and are winless in the season series:
Today: 9-1 (90.0%) ATS (any Kenpom)
Overall: 32-17 (65.3%) ATS (any Kenpom - these are the combined 1 and 2 unit plays)
Today: 2-0 ATS (100.0%) (Kenpom within 30 of the better Kenpom)
Overall: 13-3 (81.3%) ATS (Kenpom within 30 of the better Kenpom - these are the 2 unit plays)
2. Teams that have played each other once or twice and are winless in the season series:
Today: 9-1 (90.0%) ATS (any Kenpom)
Overall: 32-17 (65.3%) ATS (any Kenpom - these are the combined 1 and 2 unit plays)
Today: 2-0 ATS (100.0%) (Kenpom within 30 of the better Kenpom)
Overall: 13-3 (81.3%) ATS (Kenpom within 30 of the better Kenpom - these are the 2 unit plays)
Monday, March 11 plays:
2 unit play:
1. **St Thomas (MN) (138) +2.0 vs S. Dakota St (141) St Thomas lost 2 6:00 p.m.
1 unit plays:
2. New Orleans (337) +9.5 vs Lamar (206) 5:00 New Orleans lost 2 5:00 p.m.
3. Arkansas St (129) +5.5 vs James Madison (68) Ark St lost 1 6:00 p.m.
4. E Tenn St (173) +10.5 vs Samford (80) ETSU lost 2 6:00 p.m.
5. Stony Brook (176) +7.5 vs Hofstra (108) Stony Brook lost 2 7:30 p.m.
6. Texas A & M-Comm (327) +5.5 vs Nicholls (248) Texas A&M-Comm lost 2 7:30 p.m.
7. Santa Clara (109) +9.5 vs St Mary’s (22) Santa Clara lost 2 8:00 p.m.
8. San Francisco (70) (+8.5) vs Gonzaga (15) San Francisco lost 2 10:30 p.m.
Good luck!
Monday, March 11 plays:
2 unit play:
1. **St Thomas (MN) (138) +2.0 vs S. Dakota St (141) St Thomas lost 2 6:00 p.m.
1 unit plays:
2. New Orleans (337) +9.5 vs Lamar (206) 5:00 New Orleans lost 2 5:00 p.m.
3. Arkansas St (129) +5.5 vs James Madison (68) Ark St lost 1 6:00 p.m.
4. E Tenn St (173) +10.5 vs Samford (80) ETSU lost 2 6:00 p.m.
5. Stony Brook (176) +7.5 vs Hofstra (108) Stony Brook lost 2 7:30 p.m.
6. Texas A & M-Comm (327) +5.5 vs Nicholls (248) Texas A&M-Comm lost 2 7:30 p.m.
7. Santa Clara (109) +9.5 vs St Mary’s (22) Santa Clara lost 2 8:00 p.m.
8. San Francisco (70) (+8.5) vs Gonzaga (15) San Francisco lost 2 10:30 p.m.
Good luck!
2. Teams that have played each other once or twice and are winless in the season series:
Yesterday: 2-6 (25.0%) ATS (any Kenpom)
Overall: 34-23 (59.7%) ATS (any Kenpom - these are the combined 1 and 2 unit plays)
Yesterday: 0-1 ATS (Kenpom within 30 of the better Kenpom)
Overall: 13-4 (76.5%) ATS (Kenpom within 30 of the better Kenpom - these are the 2 unit plays)
2. Teams that have played each other once or twice and are winless in the season series:
Yesterday: 2-6 (25.0%) ATS (any Kenpom)
Overall: 34-23 (59.7%) ATS (any Kenpom - these are the combined 1 and 2 unit plays)
Yesterday: 0-1 ATS (Kenpom within 30 of the better Kenpom)
Overall: 13-4 (76.5%) ATS (Kenpom within 30 of the better Kenpom - these are the 2 unit plays)
Tuesday, March 12th plays:
2 unit plays**:
1. G. Washington** 0-2 (204) +2.5 vs LaSalle (198)
2. Georgia Tech** 0-2 (126) +1.5 vs Notre Dame (124)
3. St Louis (196) vs Rhode Island** 0-1 (209) +2.5
4. Bryant** 0-2 (172) +6.0 vs UMass-Lowell (157)
5. Miami** 0-2 (96) -2.0 vs Boston College (95)
1 Unit plays:
6. Davidson (116) vs Fordham 0-2 (201) +3.5
7. Oklahoma St 0-1 (107) +4.5 vs UCF (61)
8. Louisville 0-1 (197) +9.5 vs NC State (76)
9. New Hampshire 0-2 (254) +14.5 vs Vermont (103)
10. Lamar 0-2 (203) +14.0 vs McNeese (66)
11. Stony Brook 0-1 (173) +9.5 vs Charleston (99)
12. Milwaukee 0-2 (223) +5.0 vs Oakland (138)
13. FIU 0-2 (282) +4.5 vs Jacksonville St (183)
14. Idaho St 0-2 (253) +6.5 vs Montana (154)
Good luck!
Tuesday, March 12th plays:
2 unit plays**:
1. G. Washington** 0-2 (204) +2.5 vs LaSalle (198)
2. Georgia Tech** 0-2 (126) +1.5 vs Notre Dame (124)
3. St Louis (196) vs Rhode Island** 0-1 (209) +2.5
4. Bryant** 0-2 (172) +6.0 vs UMass-Lowell (157)
5. Miami** 0-2 (96) -2.0 vs Boston College (95)
1 Unit plays:
6. Davidson (116) vs Fordham 0-2 (201) +3.5
7. Oklahoma St 0-1 (107) +4.5 vs UCF (61)
8. Louisville 0-1 (197) +9.5 vs NC State (76)
9. New Hampshire 0-2 (254) +14.5 vs Vermont (103)
10. Lamar 0-2 (203) +14.0 vs McNeese (66)
11. Stony Brook 0-1 (173) +9.5 vs Charleston (99)
12. Milwaukee 0-2 (223) +5.0 vs Oakland (138)
13. FIU 0-2 (282) +4.5 vs Jacksonville St (183)
14. Idaho St 0-2 (253) +6.5 vs Montana (154)
Good luck!
@smellybunty
Yes, I just put “vs” for all instead of “@“ for some. I’m listing all the conference tournament games that qualify and the line has home games baked in anyway. It would be interesting, though, to see the neutral vs home results. I probably won’t go back and look at that, but if someone does, it would be helpful info.
Thank you, Mr. Bunty!
@smellybunty
Yes, I just put “vs” for all instead of “@“ for some. I’m listing all the conference tournament games that qualify and the line has home games baked in anyway. It would be interesting, though, to see the neutral vs home results. I probably won’t go back and look at that, but if someone does, it would be helpful info.
Thank you, Mr. Bunty!
@DVN73
I’m playing all the 2 star games, but debating Miami…don’t really like that game.
I will pick and choose the 1 star plays. The ones I don’t really like are Oklahoma State and Louisville. I would have to dig further on those.
However, being a degenerate, I might go small on these just for action. Also, the record represents all the qualifying plays and picking and choosing will get you a better or worse record.
@DVN73
I’m playing all the 2 star games, but debating Miami…don’t really like that game.
I will pick and choose the 1 star plays. The ones I don’t really like are Oklahoma State and Louisville. I would have to dig further on those.
However, being a degenerate, I might go small on these just for action. Also, the record represents all the qualifying plays and picking and choosing will get you a better or worse record.
2. Teams that have played each other once or twice and are winless in the season series:
Yesterday: 6-8 (42.9%) ATS (any Kenpom)
Overall: 40-31 (56.3%) ATS (any Kenpom - these are the combined 1 and 2 unit plays)
Yesterday: 1-4 (20.0%) ATS (Kenpom within 30 of the better Kenpom)
Overall: 14-8 (63.6%) ATS (Kenpom within 30 of the better Kenpom - these are the 2 unit plays)
(One basket in each of 3 of the two star game losses away from going 4-1.)
Today’s games on the way.
2. Teams that have played each other once or twice and are winless in the season series:
Yesterday: 6-8 (42.9%) ATS (any Kenpom)
Overall: 40-31 (56.3%) ATS (any Kenpom - these are the combined 1 and 2 unit plays)
Yesterday: 1-4 (20.0%) ATS (Kenpom within 30 of the better Kenpom)
Overall: 14-8 (63.6%) ATS (Kenpom within 30 of the better Kenpom - these are the 2 unit plays)
(One basket in each of 3 of the two star game losses away from going 4-1.)
Today’s games on the way.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.