they havent lost ALL YEAR by 20 probably right?
Thats a good sign for you I'm sure
they havent lost ALL YEAR by 20 probably right?
Thats a good sign for you I'm sure
I am honestly not sure. My problem is Geno will run the score up on this team if they can so they are going to get no help from UCON.
I am honestly not sure. My problem is Geno will run the score up on this team if they can so they are going to get no help from UCON.
BRO, YOURE KILLING ME WITH THIS THREAD. I usually dont come across as a hater, but with all due respect, youre either (a) full of shit or (b) stupid. Which one is it?
Its one thing to say, "Im playing Baylor with Friner to cover." Which in all actuality is not wise, but Ive seen and done worse in my lifetime.
Buts its a whole whole whole different story, when you say youre putting $6,000 on Baylor and a true Freshman against the most dminant basketball team to ever exist. Personally, I think youre full of shit. Because I truly dont believe anyone is that naieve.
I vote for and not plain (clueless and dumb). Im done with this thread, if you truly are a gambler, and you truly handicap games as opposed to just blindly bet games, I would dito hear your reasoning behing Baylor. And yes, Baylor could cover, this is gambling and sports, but as a gambler were always looking for an edge, advantage or mistake by the oddsmakers. This game has none of the three w/ Baylor-I promise you that.
Now the Stanford game, with Appel, Pedersen, Pohlen, Gold-Onwude and Ogwumike (sp?)-I am all in and them having an advantage or edge versus UConn.
Good night and best of wishes with your "large play."
BRO, YOURE KILLING ME WITH THIS THREAD. I usually dont come across as a hater, but with all due respect, youre either (a) full of shit or (b) stupid. Which one is it?
Its one thing to say, "Im playing Baylor with Friner to cover." Which in all actuality is not wise, but Ive seen and done worse in my lifetime.
Buts its a whole whole whole different story, when you say youre putting $6,000 on Baylor and a true Freshman against the most dminant basketball team to ever exist. Personally, I think youre full of shit. Because I truly dont believe anyone is that naieve.
I vote for and not plain (clueless and dumb). Im done with this thread, if you truly are a gambler, and you truly handicap games as opposed to just blindly bet games, I would dito hear your reasoning behing Baylor. And yes, Baylor could cover, this is gambling and sports, but as a gambler were always looking for an edge, advantage or mistake by the oddsmakers. This game has none of the three w/ Baylor-I promise you that.
Now the Stanford game, with Appel, Pedersen, Pohlen, Gold-Onwude and Ogwumike (sp?)-I am all in and them having an advantage or edge versus UConn.
Good night and best of wishes with your "large play."
This always annoys me. Seriously do you think you are the first person to have ever watched Vegas Vaction?
This always annoys me. Seriously do you think you are the first person to have ever watched Vegas Vaction?
BRO, YOURE KILLING ME WITH THIS THREAD. I usually dont come across as a hater, but with all due respect, youre either (a) full of shit or (b) stupid. Which one is it?
Its one thing to say, "Im playing Baylor with Friner to cover." Which in all actuality is not wise, but Ive seen and done worse in my lifetime.
Buts its a whole whole whole different story, when you say youre putting $6,000 on Baylor and a true Freshman against the most dminant basketball team to ever exist. Personally, I think youre full of shit. Because I truly dont believe anyone is that naieve.
I vote for and not plain (clueless and dumb). Im done with this thread, if you truly are a gambler, and you truly handicap games as opposed to just blindly bet games, I would dito hear your reasoning behing Baylor. And yes, Baylor could cover, this is gambling and sports, but as a gambler were always looking for an edge, advantage or mistake by the oddsmakers. This game has none of the three w/ Baylor-I promise you that.
Now the Stanford game, with Appel, Pedersen, Pohlen, Gold-Onwude and Ogwumike (sp?)-I am all in and them having an advantage or edge versus UConn.
Good night and best of wishes with your "large play."
You cannot call this man full of $hit because he has been right on so far regarding this team. Hell he played the Baylor ML against TEN when everyone was on TEN -10. So check your facts before calling him full of $hit.
If you honestly think that Stanford would have more of a chance than Baylor then you didn't see the Xaiver/Stanford game did you?
BRO, YOURE KILLING ME WITH THIS THREAD. I usually dont come across as a hater, but with all due respect, youre either (a) full of shit or (b) stupid. Which one is it?
Its one thing to say, "Im playing Baylor with Friner to cover." Which in all actuality is not wise, but Ive seen and done worse in my lifetime.
Buts its a whole whole whole different story, when you say youre putting $6,000 on Baylor and a true Freshman against the most dminant basketball team to ever exist. Personally, I think youre full of shit. Because I truly dont believe anyone is that naieve.
I vote for and not plain (clueless and dumb). Im done with this thread, if you truly are a gambler, and you truly handicap games as opposed to just blindly bet games, I would dito hear your reasoning behing Baylor. And yes, Baylor could cover, this is gambling and sports, but as a gambler were always looking for an edge, advantage or mistake by the oddsmakers. This game has none of the three w/ Baylor-I promise you that.
Now the Stanford game, with Appel, Pedersen, Pohlen, Gold-Onwude and Ogwumike (sp?)-I am all in and them having an advantage or edge versus UConn.
Good night and best of wishes with your "large play."
You cannot call this man full of $hit because he has been right on so far regarding this team. Hell he played the Baylor ML against TEN when everyone was on TEN -10. So check your facts before calling him full of $hit.
If you honestly think that Stanford would have more of a chance than Baylor then you didn't see the Xaiver/Stanford game did you?
This always annoys me. Seriously do you think you are the first person to have ever watched Vegas Vaction?
This always annoys me. Seriously do you think you are the first person to have ever watched Vegas Vaction?
BRO, YOURE KILLING ME WITH THIS THREAD. I usually dont come across as a hater, but with all due respect, youre either (a) full of shit or (b) stupid. Which one is it?
Its one thing to say, "Im playing Baylor with Friner to cover." Which in all actuality is not wise, but Ive seen and done worse in my lifetime.
Buts its a whole whole whole different story, when you say youre putting $6,000 on Baylor and a true Freshman against the most dminant basketball team to ever exist. Personally, I think youre full of shit. Because I truly dont believe anyone is that naieve.
I vote for and not plain (clueless and dumb). Im done with this thread, if you truly are a gambler, and you truly handicap games as opposed to just blindly bet games, I would dito hear your reasoning behing Baylor. And yes, Baylor could cover, this is gambling and sports, but as a gambler were always looking for an edge, advantage or mistake by the oddsmakers. This game has none of the three w/ Baylor-I promise you that.
Now the Stanford game, with Appel, Pedersen, Pohlen, Gold-Onwude and Ogwumike (sp?)-I am all in and them having an advantage or edge versus UConn.
Good night and best of wishes with your "large play."
BRO, YOURE KILLING ME WITH THIS THREAD. I usually dont come across as a hater, but with all due respect, youre either (a) full of shit or (b) stupid. Which one is it?
Its one thing to say, "Im playing Baylor with Friner to cover." Which in all actuality is not wise, but Ive seen and done worse in my lifetime.
Buts its a whole whole whole different story, when you say youre putting $6,000 on Baylor and a true Freshman against the most dminant basketball team to ever exist. Personally, I think youre full of shit. Because I truly dont believe anyone is that naieve.
I vote for and not plain (clueless and dumb). Im done with this thread, if you truly are a gambler, and you truly handicap games as opposed to just blindly bet games, I would dito hear your reasoning behing Baylor. And yes, Baylor could cover, this is gambling and sports, but as a gambler were always looking for an edge, advantage or mistake by the oddsmakers. This game has none of the three w/ Baylor-I promise you that.
Now the Stanford game, with Appel, Pedersen, Pohlen, Gold-Onwude and Ogwumike (sp?)-I am all in and them having an advantage or edge versus UConn.
Good night and best of wishes with your "large play."
You cannot call this man full of $hit because he has been right on so far regarding this team. Hell he played the Baylor ML against TEN when everyone was on TEN -10. So check your facts before calling him full of $hit.
If you honestly think that Stanford would have more of a chance than Baylor then you didn't see the Xaiver/Stanford game did you?
You cannot call this man full of $hit because he has been right on so far regarding this team. Hell he played the Baylor ML against TEN when everyone was on TEN -10. So check your facts before calling him full of $hit.
If you honestly think that Stanford would have more of a chance than Baylor then you didn't see the Xaiver/Stanford game did you?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.