My Largest Bet Of The Year... BAYLOR/UCONN

I followed you on the Baylor/Duke game, but here, I am going large with Uconn.  Griner is a special player, but Uconn has 6 or 7 special players.  They have a Griner type of player/athlete at every position and on the bench.  I got it a -22 and thought that was a discount.  Good luck, you have been money with them so far.

Hey Jesron: Im sorry, but I dont remember addressing you, so stay the f*** out of my conversation you surly, little idiot! But since you replied to my post not intended for you, heres one for you: Your lack of intelligence or reason in Womens NCAA is so obvious by your wisemouthed and assinine reply: You cannot call this man full of $hit because he has been right on so far regarding this team.  Hell he played the Baylor ML against TEN when everyone was on TEN -10.  So check your facts before calling him full of $hit.

Checky my facts, you ask? Uhhhh, whats your point again? A  man plays against a typical overrated and overvalued Tennessee team (just like most years post Candace Parker and Shamique Holdsclaw). Tennessee came marching into the tourney and lost? Surprise, Surprise! Did you know Tennessee lost in the 1st Round last year to Rutgers? So, you have no point or merit with your comment here. I too was on Baylor, and any one that knows anything about Womens Hoops knew Tennessee was an overrated and overvalued team.  Tennessee had a great regular season (like Nebraska) but we all knew the two didnt have what it takes to be NCAA Champs, either does Baylor btw.Tenessee beat themselves as much as Baylor beat them anyway. And who the f*** is 2010 Tennessee anyway=Arguably "garbage team" without 1 SR on team, and personally, I dont even think Stricklen, Cain or Bjorklund are worth .02 cents, so get your info straight before popping off at the mouth.

I stand by my opinion/point, "why would anyone, that values money and gambles to profit and not to "have action" place 22 units/$6,000 whatever, on a team with no outside perimter game, no rebounding at all (besides Griner), no leadership, etc versus arguably the most dominant basketball team in the history of sports?"  And at 10% juice?

Yes, Rickydee can do whatever he wants, but as far as value/matchups/situational handicapping go, what a stupid stupid stupid play. Ive witnessed UConn beat much much much better teams by 50+ points over the past 10 years than the 2010 FR lead Baylor team.  And if Rickydee was wise, he would wait til the line reached 23-25 points, like it will. No disrespect Rickydee, do whatever you wish with "your money" and for all intents and purposes-Good Luck, But boy oh boy, what a stupid play in Baylor +20.5 at $6,600 to win $6,000. Hell, as I type, my ticker shows Baylor +22.5? Go figure.....

If you honestly think that Stanford would have more of a chance than Baylor then you didn't see the Xaiver/Stanford game did you?

Im almost embarrassed replying to this ludicrous comment of yours but I will, just to point out your complete stupidity- Did I see the Stanford/Xavier game? Yes I did. And did you see the Mens Butler vs Murray State game? And did you see the Mens Michigan State vs Maryland game and did you see the Mens Michigan State vs Tennessee game? Because a team "almost loses" or has a "bad game" that does not make them a bad team Einstein. Xavier was a matchup problem from the get go for Xavier because of Xaviers immense size (and talent too). Anyone that knows anything about Womens College hoops knows that every year there are 2-4 Great teams with Great players, and then there is the rest of the NCAA, of which the 2-4 teams are 20+ points better than on each given night. Stanford is "by far" and hands down, no question the 2nd best team in Womens Hoops. Yes Baylor has Ashley "the dunking phenom from Nimitz" but UConn has 6-7 equally efficient players that all play together and for petes sake have won 76.

So jesron make as many comments as you wish to what Ive typed this evening, as I may not even read them for a few days (I have better things to do than type rebuttals to you)but it is apparent you my friend and not I, know very very little about Womens Hoops and I would bet you know very little about wagering in general.

So what are your Mens and Womens Final 4 Plays? Do you handicap games or just surf threads?!

You so called rebuttal is beyond rediculous.  I have already posted several comments on this thread about my concerns for RickyDees play and I personally haven't playing anything yet.  However, lets look at what you said and is there anything gamblers can hang their hat one.  NADA, ZILTCH, ZERO, kinda like you with your pompous attitude.  What you basically said is UCON is the best team that ever existed and can beat anyone by 50 at anytime.  WOW great analysis... you sound like everyone else who supports UCON, thanks for the contribution to this forum without you we would all be lost.

Then you review my comment on how I said RickyDees took Baylor over Tennessee.  Congrats for you to say AFTER THE FACT that you also took Baylor too and determined at the time that you think TEN is overrated.  Funny thing is I don't see you ever created thread about this so you credibility is lacking.

Finally, you made the unbelievable OBVIOUS observation AFTER the Stanford game about how Stanford would have matchup problems with Xaiver.  WOW YOU ARE A GENIUS!  That was pretty clear while watching the game.  But what again you didn't share this insight with anyone so even if you believed this (I doubt it) again little to no credibility.  Funny thing is that you don't mention that Baylor would also cause matchup problems for anyone they play.  But of course you think you know best and there would be no proving a genius like you wrong.

It always amazes me how I meet the most incredible handicappers on this website.  The only problem is that they are ony amazing after the game is over because then and only then do these people come out of the woodwork claiming they were right about this and that.  Congrats you qualify for this group.

Finally, I personally don't know RickyDees but he has supplied good information to this forum and as such is an asset.  What have you done or than say in another mans thread that he is stupid to bet against UCON with absolutely nothing to support that conclusion or than OMG THEY ARE LIKE THE BEST TEAM EVER!

Fair enough.  I should have probably taking this argument elsewhere and not in your thread.  I am sorry for polluting your thread.  Personally I am leaning BAY as well and hoping to get 25 or more.  If I was completely in favore of UCON I would have bet them when they first came out.  I could perhaps see UCON 1H hitting but I see BAY staying within 25 (and hopefully also 20).  I also lean under with these two defensive teams but it will depend on the total.  Anything under 130 I am taking the under.  What are your thoughts on the total?