5:15 Et
#681 NC Greensboro +6.5 vs Samford
IS a play
(I bought to 7 but will apply +6.5 to system record)
***I dont think Cof Charlseton covered
jw11
5:15 Et
#681 NC Greensboro +6.5 vs Samford
IS a play
(I bought to 7 but will apply +6.5 to system record)
***I dont think Cof Charlseton covered
jw11
Charlston covered easily at the half...but collapsed in 2H.
FYI....I believe this system would have a record of 16-4 or maybe even 17-3 if it were a 1st HALF only system.
FYI.
jw11
Charlston covered easily at the half...but collapsed in 2H.
FYI....I believe this system would have a record of 16-4 or maybe even 17-3 if it were a 1st HALF only system.
FYI.
jw11
cool...thanks Barn
Let's keep the attitude positive here guys...a long way to go today.
jw11
cool...thanks Barn
Let's keep the attitude positive here guys...a long way to go today.
jw11
I was thinking of doing the same Shazam.....3 seperate bets.
Like I said at the beginning of this thread, I will re-evaluate the system after 2 weeks....and that will be after tomorrows games.
I jave a pretty good idea of what I will do, but have to think on it a lil more.
GL2us bud
jw11
I was thinking of doing the same Shazam.....3 seperate bets.
Like I said at the beginning of this thread, I will re-evaluate the system after 2 weeks....and that will be after tomorrows games.
I jave a pretty good idea of what I will do, but have to think on it a lil more.
GL2us bud
jw11
GUYS>>>>NO PLAY ALERT
UTAH +1.5 vs COL ST would be a play BUT
here is an injury to UTAH's 32 scorer and rebounder.
I see OUT INDEF here and questionable elsewhere.
NO PLAY
GUYS>>>>NO PLAY ALERT
UTAH +1.5 vs COL ST would be a play BUT
here is an injury to UTAH's 32 scorer and rebounder.
I see OUT INDEF here and questionable elsewhere.
NO PLAY
5:15 Et
#681 NC Greensboro +6.5 vs Samford
Greensboro up 20 at the half....I'm really learning something here.
1st H plays would be 18-3 or 17-4......90% winners
5:15 Et
#681 NC Greensboro +6.5 vs Samford
Greensboro up 20 at the half....I'm really learning something here.
1st H plays would be 18-3 or 17-4......90% winners
I"m almost certain of one change to the system...
When a favorite fits...which seems to be rarely...I may only play it for the 1stH
thanks for the heads up Will
I"m almost certain of one change to the system...
When a favorite fits...which seems to be rarely...I may only play it for the 1stH
thanks for the heads up Will
I think I'll stay away from
THE SUMMIT league
and
THE IVY league Will.
gotta draw the line somewhere or I'll be playin High School soon.
LOL.
But by all means...if ya feel it....
GL
BTW ...I appreciate the post
jw11
I think I'll stay away from
THE SUMMIT league
and
THE IVY league Will.
gotta draw the line somewhere or I'll be playin High School soon.
LOL.
But by all means...if ya feel it....
GL
BTW ...I appreciate the post
jw11
I myself have used similar strategies as this one....but you gotta be careful of reverse line movement which creates the trap you're referring to.
Looking at ArkSt v ArkLR which opened at -4.5 now down to -3, when all consensus picks from the public favor ArkLR around 60%.....which would make common sense for those favoring ArkLR to even grow with a smaller line right?? The total jumped from 134 to 143 and line dropped 1.5 points....which makes me believe a lot of heavy smart $ came in on the over and ArkST late in the day, otherwise why would Vegas move the line against the majority?
I say go against the book and take ArkSt +3.
I myself have used similar strategies as this one....but you gotta be careful of reverse line movement which creates the trap you're referring to.
Looking at ArkSt v ArkLR which opened at -4.5 now down to -3, when all consensus picks from the public favor ArkLR around 60%.....which would make common sense for those favoring ArkLR to even grow with a smaller line right?? The total jumped from 134 to 143 and line dropped 1.5 points....which makes me believe a lot of heavy smart $ came in on the over and ArkST late in the day, otherwise why would Vegas move the line against the majority?
I say go against the book and take ArkSt +3.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.