Georgia Tech +5.5 - Line opened Louis -6.5 85% wagers & 87% money on Louis and line is now down -5.5
La Salle +4.5 - Lined opened Rich -5 81% wagers & 79% money on Rich and line is now 4.5.
IMHO GTech is the better play....
Georgia Tech +5.5 - Line opened Louis -6.5 85% wagers & 87% money on Louis and line is now down -5.5
La Salle +4.5 - Lined opened Rich -5 81% wagers & 79% money on Rich and line is now 4.5.
IMHO GTech is the better play....
Georgia Tech +5.5 - Line opened Louis -6.5 85% wagers & 87% money on Louis and line is now down -5.5
La Salle +4.5 - Lined opened Rich -5 81% wagers & 79% money on Rich and line is now 4.5.
IMHO GTech is the better play....
You da man! Be picky, Red.
You da man! Be picky, Red.
La Salle, Samford (but they're awful), Georgia Tech, Oklahoma, USF... Depending on what site you're using, Valpo, Northwestern? Who did I miss?
La Salle, Samford (but they're awful), Georgia Tech, Oklahoma, USF... Depending on what site you're using, Valpo, Northwestern? Who did I miss?
LaSalle, GT have recent injuries, so not sure if they're a clean play. TAMU barely squeaks by the Redtear criteria but also has an injury. Binghamton, Northwester and Samfort should play - I think lol.
LaSalle, GT have recent injuries, so not sure if they're a clean play. TAMU barely squeaks by the Redtear criteria but also has an injury. Binghamton, Northwester and Samfort should play - I think lol.
Which site do you guys predominantly use for this? I've been using the 'Trend Movement vs Line' feature on Vegas Insider but haven't necessarily come to the same conclusions as some of the above. For eg, based on what I'm looking at I would have Central Arkansas as worth exploring (line has only moved from -5 to -5.5 for them but with less than 10% of the money on them at every update) but don't see much of the same trend for La Salle. Presuming there's other sites which offer the same feature but have different numbers.
Which site do you guys predominantly use for this? I've been using the 'Trend Movement vs Line' feature on Vegas Insider but haven't necessarily come to the same conclusions as some of the above. For eg, based on what I'm looking at I would have Central Arkansas as worth exploring (line has only moved from -5 to -5.5 for them but with less than 10% of the money on them at every update) but don't see much of the same trend for La Salle. Presuming there's other sites which offer the same feature but have different numbers.
It's amazing how this system works... GT was the strongest of these plays today and I just wish I had the ball to play the ML.....
It's amazing how this system works... GT was the strongest of these plays today and I just wish I had the ball to play the ML.....
Wash +2.5 - USC opened as a 4.5 fav and even tho they are getting 84% of wagers and 80% of the money, line has gone down to -2.5
Wash +3 (-120)
Wash ML +120
Wash +2.5 - USC opened as a 4.5 fav and even tho they are getting 84% of wagers and 80% of the money, line has gone down to -2.5
Wash +3 (-120)
Wash ML +120
There are a lot of cappers on here that can beat the books but at the end of the day the Sportsbook knows WAYYYY more than your average Joe. If you dig hard enough the books will ultimately tell you who you need to play.
There are a lot of cappers on here that can beat the books but at the end of the day the Sportsbook knows WAYYYY more than your average Joe. If you dig hard enough the books will ultimately tell you who you need to play.
I am not seeing that % of wagers on Washington...where are you seeing those at?
I am not seeing that % of wagers on Washington...where are you seeing those at?
Well put, moe. That was one of the most important realizations for me personally in this game. I played and (follow) a lot of hoops, I've got some analytics background, but there are people who are much smarter than me in every aspect of this... some of whom contribute to this forum. Many of the best of whom work for the books.
As Plato's Socrates says in the Apology, "I seem, then, in just this little thing to be wiser than this man at any rate, that what I do not know I do not think I know either."
Well put, moe. That was one of the most important realizations for me personally in this game. I played and (follow) a lot of hoops, I've got some analytics background, but there are people who are much smarter than me in every aspect of this... some of whom contribute to this forum. Many of the best of whom work for the books.
As Plato's Socrates says in the Apology, "I seem, then, in just this little thing to be wiser than this man at any rate, that what I do not know I do not think I know either."
Action has 80% wagers & 82% money on Trojans...
VegasInsiser has 75% wagers on Trojans
Action has 80% wagers & 82% money on Trojans...
VegasInsiser has 75% wagers on Trojans
Seeing it now, sure was around 55-60% earlier when I looked...
Seeing it now, sure was around 55-60% earlier when I looked...
After years and year and years of betting (and losing) you have to start to realize that you can beat the books but ultimately not by much if you're in the top tier of cappers with all the analytics, models (for example, EW here). He is probably one of the only handful of Cappers that can beat the Sportbooks by pure analytics and knowledge and more than not he's squeezing out wins by mere half a point or so.
Then you have the folks that figured the system by reading lines. What I mean is when you see a game and are like "No way so and so is only getting X points". One of the cappers I follow very very close on here is KingScorpio. I don't think any one knows how he actually caps his game but I have an inkling it's A LOT of line reading because if you follow him enough he bets these ridiculous games no one else would lay their money on and he hits at a 60% clip consistently. He's essentially playing the games Vegas is telling you to play. The best example on this was his write-up on the UConn vs. Cincy game last Sunday. He straight up wrote how is Uconn such a short dog when they've lost 8 in a row to Cinci and Cinci having the way better record. Most on here was on Cinci because of EVERYONE sees the trends, records and matchup and low and behold Uconn covers & wins SU.
All this to say...once you realize Vegas is leaps and bounds smarter and more talented then you, you will start to cap better and win.
After years and year and years of betting (and losing) you have to start to realize that you can beat the books but ultimately not by much if you're in the top tier of cappers with all the analytics, models (for example, EW here). He is probably one of the only handful of Cappers that can beat the Sportbooks by pure analytics and knowledge and more than not he's squeezing out wins by mere half a point or so.
Then you have the folks that figured the system by reading lines. What I mean is when you see a game and are like "No way so and so is only getting X points". One of the cappers I follow very very close on here is KingScorpio. I don't think any one knows how he actually caps his game but I have an inkling it's A LOT of line reading because if you follow him enough he bets these ridiculous games no one else would lay their money on and he hits at a 60% clip consistently. He's essentially playing the games Vegas is telling you to play. The best example on this was his write-up on the UConn vs. Cincy game last Sunday. He straight up wrote how is Uconn such a short dog when they've lost 8 in a row to Cinci and Cinci having the way better record. Most on here was on Cinci because of EVERYONE sees the trends, records and matchup and low and behold Uconn covers & wins SU.
All this to say...once you realize Vegas is leaps and bounds smarter and more talented then you, you will start to cap better and win.
Just got home from work and popped on scoresandodds and Clemson looking like a text book play. Sacramento st and Providence look like possible candidates. More so leaning prov
Just got home from work and popped on scoresandodds and Clemson looking like a text book play. Sacramento st and Providence look like possible candidates. More so leaning prov
Popping on kenpom real quick like but don't love prov, struggle shooting but have the potential to dominate the glass. If they can keep up those 2nd chance points they'll be alright
Popping on kenpom real quick like but don't love prov, struggle shooting but have the potential to dominate the glass. If they can keep up those 2nd chance points they'll be alright
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.