RP Ball
Yes we are taking Cal the points, and our line for the Gonzaga game is the Zags 14.30.
Coincidentally at -9, (delta of 5.30t), this would correlate rather nicely to a 4 point underdog, very close in expectation.
Yes, we would wager about a smuch on the zags, as we would on a 4 point dog (difference in line, that is), all the while remembering that the dogs ae the best plays.
BOL
Shirley
RP Ball
Yes we are taking Cal the points, and our line for the Gonzaga game is the Zags 14.30.
Coincidentally at -9, (delta of 5.30t), this would correlate rather nicely to a 4 point underdog, very close in expectation.
Yes, we would wager about a smuch on the zags, as we would on a 4 point dog (difference in line, that is), all the while remembering that the dogs ae the best plays.
BOL
Shirley
Shirley, going off of your numbers, which play is stronger?
Portland -3.5 (3.7 difference, but favored)
Poly SLO +2.5 (3.1 difference, but an underdog)
Thanks!
Shirley, going off of your numbers, which play is stronger?
Portland -3.5 (3.7 difference, but favored)
Poly SLO +2.5 (3.1 difference, but an underdog)
Thanks!
Shirley, going off of your numbers, which play is stronger?
Portland -3.5 (3.7 difference, but favored)
Poly SLO +2.5 (3.1 difference, but an underdog)
Thanks!
The dog is slightly better, but I'm not recommending either wager at those odds. I would search or simply wait for a better line
Shirley
Shirley, going off of your numbers, which play is stronger?
Portland -3.5 (3.7 difference, but favored)
Poly SLO +2.5 (3.1 difference, but an underdog)
Thanks!
The dog is slightly better, but I'm not recommending either wager at those odds. I would search or simply wait for a better line
Shirley
Shirley,
I am impressed by your analysis even though I don't understand your numbers and their meaning. I am trying hard to digest your info so that I can place some wagers.
I went back and loked at a post from 1-17-11, see below:
The rest of my plays are as follows. Please excuse typos
1) Richmond OVER 132
2) JMU UNDER 61.5 1H
3) Drexel OVER 59.5 1H
4) N Mex OVER 67 1H
5) Texas UNDER 132
6) St. Louis UNDER 121.5
7) Umass UNDER 132.5
8) Mizz St. UNDER 59.5 1H
9) Lasalle UNDER 159.5
These numbers I can easily understand. Therefore for the sake of this dummy, and others that may be like me, could you please post your selections in this format?
Thanks so much,
Dean
Shirley,
I am impressed by your analysis even though I don't understand your numbers and their meaning. I am trying hard to digest your info so that I can place some wagers.
I went back and loked at a post from 1-17-11, see below:
The rest of my plays are as follows. Please excuse typos
1) Richmond OVER 132
2) JMU UNDER 61.5 1H
3) Drexel OVER 59.5 1H
4) N Mex OVER 67 1H
5) Texas UNDER 132
6) St. Louis UNDER 121.5
7) Umass UNDER 132.5
8) Mizz St. UNDER 59.5 1H
9) Lasalle UNDER 159.5
These numbers I can easily understand. Therefore for the sake of this dummy, and others that may be like me, could you please post your selections in this format?
Thanks so much,
Dean
It's really hard to read your posting. I'm not crazy about your lines, as you should hunt for 4 point differences before making a wager. Also, the dog in the Portland State game is our superior play. I wouldn't recommend playing any favorites that did not have at least a 4 point difference from our line.
BOL
Shirley
It's really hard to read your posting. I'm not crazy about your lines, as you should hunt for 4 point differences before making a wager. Also, the dog in the Portland State game is our superior play. I wouldn't recommend playing any favorites that did not have at least a 4 point difference from our line.
BOL
Shirley
It's really hard to read your posting. I'm not crazy about your lines, as you should hunt for 4 point differences before making a wager. Also, the dog in the Portland State game is our superior play. I wouldn't recommend playing any favorites that did not have at least a 4 point difference from our line.
BOL
Shirley
It's really hard to read your posting. I'm not crazy about your lines, as you should hunt for 4 point differences before making a wager. Also, the dog in the Portland State game is our superior play. I wouldn't recommend playing any favorites that did not have at least a 4 point difference from our line.
BOL
Shirley
I will try to answer your questions.
A computer model comes up with the difference, that has been said many times in here and on other threads.
I am getting my numbers from the computer model. I'm not smart enough to come up woth the games in my own head, sorry.
Our 4 top picks would be wagers on UNDERDOGS, where we are receiving at least 4 or more points from our line. Our lines our posted on page 1 of this thread. It is your job to assess if your lines ssatisfies the wagering requirements for a play.
I have no idea of what lines you are getting, and they are probably different than my own and others on this site.
I hope this helps
Shirley
I will try to answer your questions.
A computer model comes up with the difference, that has been said many times in here and on other threads.
I am getting my numbers from the computer model. I'm not smart enough to come up woth the games in my own head, sorry.
Our 4 top picks would be wagers on UNDERDOGS, where we are receiving at least 4 or more points from our line. Our lines our posted on page 1 of this thread. It is your job to assess if your lines ssatisfies the wagering requirements for a play.
I have no idea of what lines you are getting, and they are probably different than my own and others on this site.
I hope this helps
Shirley
Shirley,
I am impressed by your analysis even though I don't understand your numbers and their meaning. I am trying hard to digest your info so that I can place some wagers.
These numbers I can easily understand. Therefore for the sake of this dummy, and others that may be like me, could you please post your selections in this format?
Thanks so much,
Dean
Dean, youre going to have to do a little work. My lines are listed on page 1 of this thread. My suggestion is to wager on any game where ther is a 4 point difference from my lines, and giving extra weight for underdogs.
We all have different lines, and I want each and every person to make their own decisions whether to play a game or not.
Ideally you already have a game in mind, and my numbers could supplement or reinforce your analytical evaluation of a particular matchup.
BOL
Shirley
Shirley,
I am impressed by your analysis even though I don't understand your numbers and their meaning. I am trying hard to digest your info so that I can place some wagers.
These numbers I can easily understand. Therefore for the sake of this dummy, and others that may be like me, could you please post your selections in this format?
Thanks so much,
Dean
Dean, youre going to have to do a little work. My lines are listed on page 1 of this thread. My suggestion is to wager on any game where ther is a 4 point difference from my lines, and giving extra weight for underdogs.
We all have different lines, and I want each and every person to make their own decisions whether to play a game or not.
Ideally you already have a game in mind, and my numbers could supplement or reinforce your analytical evaluation of a particular matchup.
BOL
Shirley
Shirley, thank you for sharing your info with us. My first question is will you be providing "your lines" daily? Secondly, will your lines be posted here or in a "Secure" website??
Shirley, thank you for sharing your info with us. My first question is will you be providing "your lines" daily? Secondly, will your lines be posted here or in a "Secure" website??
You are correct, what I was referring to was your listing of 3 point differences in your initial post. It was difficult to see, and I didn't think you had the Port St game, only Port.
You're on the right track, just stay away from 3 point differences and play the 4 or more.
BOL
Shirley
You are correct, what I was referring to was your listing of 3 point differences in your initial post. It was difficult to see, and I didn't think you had the Port St game, only Port.
You're on the right track, just stay away from 3 point differences and play the 4 or more.
BOL
Shirley
Shirley, thank you for sharing your info with us. My first question is will you be providing "your lines" daily? Secondly, will your lines be posted here or in a "Secure" website??
I really don't have time to post every day, only when time permits.So to answer your question, no.
I will be busy with our business over the next 3-4 days, so it's unlikely I will be able to post at all, perhaps just a game or two, as I have a difficult time not getting involved while trusting my work to my partner 100%.
We have decided not to post our totals here anymore, just on the private site we share info with others on. Our posted totals here yesterday were 2-3, however we actually wagered on 17 game totals and went 10-7. It's been a down year for totals, so you're not really missing much anyway.
I hope this clears things up for you
Shirley
Shirley, thank you for sharing your info with us. My first question is will you be providing "your lines" daily? Secondly, will your lines be posted here or in a "Secure" website??
I really don't have time to post every day, only when time permits.So to answer your question, no.
I will be busy with our business over the next 3-4 days, so it's unlikely I will be able to post at all, perhaps just a game or two, as I have a difficult time not getting involved while trusting my work to my partner 100%.
We have decided not to post our totals here anymore, just on the private site we share info with others on. Our posted totals here yesterday were 2-3, however we actually wagered on 17 game totals and went 10-7. It's been a down year for totals, so you're not really missing much anyway.
I hope this clears things up for you
Shirley
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.