All Forums | College Basketball

Tonight, Fellas, We Crowned a FRAUD Champion

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1910
Posts: 40
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 7041
Posted: #26
Quote Originally Posted by teflondon:

Absolutely the weakest National Champion we've had in quite some time. Maybe it's time to do away with seeding...UConn should've been a 12 or 13 seed and I  think that would have made a difference.

It's a shame we go all the way through the tourney and get a championship game of this quality. I could pick 15 teams that would have beat either of these pretenders tonight. It's this very reason that I don't wager the tourney.

Sorry bro but what you are saying is wrong. there were probley 15 teams that could have won this tourney this year, uconn being one of them. there was no dominate team this year. uconn proved it was the most dominate team in tourney games this year by going 14-0...this is all due to the fact kids are going to the nba and not to coll it is making the coll game very weak..

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 215
Posted: #27
Quote Originally Posted by trehoops:

  KANSAS???  YOU MUST BE DRUNK!!  YEAH, LET'S WATCH THE MORRISS TWINS SOME MORE!!  


Fail. At least Osirus is intelligent enough to make a genuine argument out of this. You want to have a serious discussion/debate/argument, then you should approach the matter with something more serious than this. Then again you can't expect much from people that express their opinions with emoticons.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1128
Posted: #28
heres the deal. every single team in this tourney had the same chance as these two. they both put it together to get to this game and UCONN kept it together. If kansas or OSU or duke would have played well enough, then they would have been here. They didnt and have noone else to blame but themselves.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 1501
Posted: #29
Quote Originally Posted by teflondon:

Absolutely the weakest National Champion we've had in quite some time. Maybe it's time to do away with seeding...UConn should've been a 12 or 13 seed and I  think that would have made a difference.

It's a shame we go all the way through the tourney and get a championship game of this quality. I could pick 15 teams that would have beat either of these pretenders tonight. It's this very reason that I don't wager the tourney.

Your so full of itlet me guess you have nothing better to do than hang out on covers and don't bet on college basketball?  Now that's funny...You bet on Butler and you lost....get over it.

Oh yeah 15 other teams that could beat these two teams, the only problem is they couldn't beat the opponent that was put in front of them

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1043
Posted: #30
People who complaint afterward are all Butler's loser. If Butler win, they'll say what a Cinderella story, that's whats great about college basketball.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 355
Posted: #31
Quote Originally Posted by BigEastExpert:

 Come on over!

UCONN = NCAA champs!

So true.....I was on the right team and made a bit of cash.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 417
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by ChestnutHill:



Fail. At least Osirus is intelligent enough to make a genuine argument out of this. You want to have a serious discussion/debate/argument, then you should approach the matter with something more serious than this. Then again you can't expect much from people that express their opinions with emoticons.
  WHAT'S TO DEBATE?  KANSAS GOT WHUPPED BY VCU. WHY WOULD YOU WANT TO WATCH THEM IN TITLE GAME?  BUTLER HAD A HORRIFIC SHOOTING GAME, BUT I WOULD TAKE THEIR SIDE EVERY TIME AGAINST KANSAS. IF YOU KNOW A LITTLE BIT ABOUT HOOP, AND YOU WATCH THE TWO TEAMS PLAY, THE DISCIPLINE, HEART, DESIRE THAT BUTLER SHOWS, I WANT MY MONEY ON BUTLER. OR, WE COULD WATCH THE FABULOUS MORRISS  TWINS A FEW MORE GAMES.     
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 417
Posted: #33
Quote Originally Posted by ChestnutHill:



Fail. At least Osirus is intelligent enough to make a genuine argument out of this. You want to have a serious discussion/debate/argument, then you should approach the matter with something more serious than this. Then again you can't expect much from people that express their opinions with emoticons.
   HE DID HIT THE NAIL ON THE HEAD THOUGH, WHEN HE CALLED YOU, "DUMBASS". 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 831
Posted: #34

Quote Originally Posted by ATLGettinPaper:

Win or go home baby.........  If you can't do that, then you not the best....

Sorry to tell ya....  Now all of a sudden the BCS is good now?  You clowns will never be happy, and will always complain about whatever system is in place.  I say whatever the system is, be good at it and be the best and no matter what you will get the prize at the end.

 Some people will never be happy.........

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 2993
Posted: #35
Quote Originally Posted by teflondon:

Absolutely the weakest National Champion we've had in quite some time. Maybe it's time to do away with seeding...UConn should've been a 12 or 13 seed and I  think that would have made a difference.

It's a shame we go all the way through the tourney and get a championship game of this quality. I could pick 15 teams that would have beat either of these pretenders tonight. It's this very reason that I don't wager the tourney.

On the flip side I doubt if 15 dumber things have been said this year in sports breakdowns then the dribble you have put forth ....  
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 18
Posted: #36

The only thing that happened was pressure. If you have never played the sport on the college level, nevermind the millions that are watching, you would not understand what those teams were going thru. Butler wanted to win for all the "mid-majors" and UConn was determined not to let one of the "little sisters of the poor" win it. That's why it was an ugly game!!!

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2002
Posts: 1649
Posted: #37
Just a little bit of an overreaction to ONE game don't ya think? All teams are capable of having a shitty night or two throughout the course of the season. Just because both teams played one of their poorer games of the year at an inopportune time doesn't mean they suck or that we should overhaul the whole system. I do agree that the one & done mentality is adversely affecting the quality of the teams & play somewhat, but nobody was bitching about any of this until after the game. You guys complaining may have had a point if you brought up this fraud thing 2 weeks ago.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 1468
Posted: #38
Quote Originally Posted by Greens_Rams:

53 points.

I guess anyone can win a National Title nowadays!

Dumbest post of the day.

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2003
Posts: 10395
Posted: #39
Best year of march madness I've ever witnessed.  The only negative thing I can say about the whole tournament was how docile the Nat'l Title game was... Oh Well.

I blame it on Howard.  1-13 from the field, wtf?
 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2003
Posts: 10395
Posted: #40
Quote Originally Posted by BOUNTYHOUNTER:

Sorry bro but what you are saying is wrong. there were probley 15 teams that could have won this tourney this year, uconn being one of them. there was no dominate team this year. uconn proved it was the most dominate team in tourney games this year by going 14-0...this is all due to the fact kids are going to the nba and not to coll it is making the coll game very weak..



Damn straight dude, daaaaaamn straight.
All Forums | College Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.