All Forums | College Football

63% of the Public is on Louisville -21. I love it!!! Ohio +21 is easy money!!!

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 6486
Posts: 94
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 2801
Posted: #76
Easy lou
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 2008
Posted: #77
the real sharps were on ville 1st half
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 106
Posted: #78
Teddyy......please STOP.......stop teddy

The Ville could have a heisman winner and push for a national title game ......I don't see many undefeateds this year in major conferences


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 439
Posted: #79
I tried telling you idiots. Teddy is the best Qb in the nation
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 6351
Posted: #80
I love threads like this.  Classic covers $hit!  
Let's go Darwin
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 7190
Posted: #81

Man...Bridgewater is the real deal!

Bet with your wallet,not your heart
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 118
Posted: #82
Louisville is solid.  The only way they don't cover is if they give it away....A LOT!!.

Even a modest amount of errors on their part and they still win this by 30...
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 380
Posted: #83
Still easy money?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 340
Posted: #84
why dont the owner of the original thread ever come back on when their team is getting the suga beat out of them????

Teddy will go undefeated until late in the season...

jump on the wagon now...make that 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 6351
Posted: #85
It was nice knowing you The_Six.  
Let's go Darwin
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 672
Posted: #86
Quote Originally Posted by jdnmoney:


what? are you saying that they lost to Uconn because all of the betting action was on them to win?

thats absolutely and incredibly retarded and such a foolish thing to say...

if you arent saying that, i am sorry for my remarks, and please tell me what you are saying. 

You based your decision on last years results and I'm the retard? There have been many many games with funny lines where 90+% of money is on the "sure thing" and what ends up happening? Look I don't want to get into the whole "are games ever fixed" debate, but looking at your flawed capping of this game makes me wonder how you're considered a gambler?

For you to jump on someone you don't even know for making a comment shows a lack of IQ
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 440
Posted: #87
my friend trust me when i say
i learned the hard way,,
that angle does not work!


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 1384
Posted: #88
Quote Originally Posted by Gambit:

who else thinks aj mcarron is garbage?


the O line is what gave him all that time last year, so he looked good, not so good now....he went backward imo

but of course I am an Auburn fan and hate Bama
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 955
Posted: #89
If the public is on a certain team it's a automatic loser...says the loser who always faded the public!
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2003
Posts: 18138
Posted: #90
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 416
Posted: #91
Should never doubt Teddy B 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2001
Posts: 997
Posted: #92

No one on this board believes more in bucking the public than me.

But if you do it on a regular basis across the board, you will at best hit around 51-52% winners which is going to lose money.

Better than backing the public side for sure (hits about 48 to 49% over the long haul and a guaranteed money maker for the books ).

I suggest picking a list of top 10 anti public plays each week and then work down from that list to your top 5 based on other considerations that have been shown to work for you ( trends,stats, line moves,whatever has shown success in the past for your style of capping).

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 38798
Posted: #93
womp. good reasoning but Ohio just didn't bring the intensity
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 416
Posted: #94
Didn't bring the intensity? I was there. Louisville just embarrassed them.
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.