Coker had the game of his life thanks to OJ Howard. Hurts can't throw the ball consistently. Clemson defense got better as the season progressed. Watson and crew will be ready tomorrow. Williams and Leggett will have that defense spread out. Look for slants, screens and qb draw all night long.
0
Coker had the game of his life thanks to OJ Howard. Hurts can't throw the ball consistently. Clemson defense got better as the season progressed. Watson and crew will be ready tomorrow. Williams and Leggett will have that defense spread out. Look for slants, screens and qb draw all night long.
BOOM are you worried about the grabbing thing and Ben admitting that's Clemsons way? Do you think all of the Players are alittle "funny: if you know what I mean, or just some players? I'm afraid there are more then a few Mike Sams on Clemson and that will mean that D will be pushed around bad.
0
BOOM are you worried about the grabbing thing and Ben admitting that's Clemsons way? Do you think all of the Players are alittle "funny: if you know what I mean, or just some players? I'm afraid there are more then a few Mike Sams on Clemson and that will mean that D will be pushed around bad.
Bozeman a weak link how? he's graded out at 80% or better blocking in every game this season....and has allowed zero sacks in 10 of 12 games....and was named offense player of the game numerous times...He's done a great job as the offensive line play caller, and overall leader .... Bama has weaknesses, but Bozeman isn't one of them..
0
Bozeman a weak link how? he's graded out at 80% or better blocking in every game this season....and has allowed zero sacks in 10 of 12 games....and was named offense player of the game numerous times...He's done a great job as the offensive line play caller, and overall leader .... Bama has weaknesses, but Bozeman isn't one of them..
You keep talking about the ESPN leading the sheep and public perception leading people to making poor choices. And you are correct, you are just on the wrong side which is understandable considering your background. Don't you think the odds makes knew all of this public perception stuff when making the spread for this game? Throwing a -6 right from the get go, right after Clemson just destroyed Ohio State? And now a week later, everyone and their mother is on Clemson plus the points, Clemson money line etc.... Public perception is that it is way too many points and Clemson is going to cover easily. So easy right? That is the public perception, the odds makers know it and that is why they threw out Clemson + almost a touchdown. Because if it was Alabama -1 80% of the bets would be on them and they would not make any money. But to make money, they had to throw out Clemson plus a lot of points to reel in people like you. I am not hating on anyone in this thread, just saying you are absolutely right about public perception. You are just on the wrong side. Best of luck with your plays.
0
You keep talking about the ESPN leading the sheep and public perception leading people to making poor choices. And you are correct, you are just on the wrong side which is understandable considering your background. Don't you think the odds makes knew all of this public perception stuff when making the spread for this game? Throwing a -6 right from the get go, right after Clemson just destroyed Ohio State? And now a week later, everyone and their mother is on Clemson plus the points, Clemson money line etc.... Public perception is that it is way too many points and Clemson is going to cover easily. So easy right? That is the public perception, the odds makers know it and that is why they threw out Clemson + almost a touchdown. Because if it was Alabama -1 80% of the bets would be on them and they would not make any money. But to make money, they had to throw out Clemson plus a lot of points to reel in people like you. I am not hating on anyone in this thread, just saying you are absolutely right about public perception. You are just on the wrong side. Best of luck with your plays.
Excuse my non statistical opinion, but bama will find a way win, always have always will. It has always been bama and everyone else. I felt like Washington had a better offense than Clemson and after their first drive it was sad. Expect a defensive TD from bama to put the game away as per usual. Great points in here but I feel like on this forum in particular there is always some massive write ups on dogs, no disrespect to yours, it was well thought out. So many Clemson riders on here I felt the need to say something which I never do. I want to root for Clemson but they aren't going to win this game, no one but bama was going to and everyone knew it early in the season.
0
Excuse my non statistical opinion, but bama will find a way win, always have always will. It has always been bama and everyone else. I felt like Washington had a better offense than Clemson and after their first drive it was sad. Expect a defensive TD from bama to put the game away as per usual. Great points in here but I feel like on this forum in particular there is always some massive write ups on dogs, no disrespect to yours, it was well thought out. So many Clemson riders on here I felt the need to say something which I never do. I want to root for Clemson but they aren't going to win this game, no one but bama was going to and everyone knew it early in the season.
Boom....nice writeup and I agree the orange is the side tonight but my advise for you is to tread lightly. no way that your expertise on your team does NOT cloud your vision a little bit....
Enjoy the fact that your squad is almost to the promised land but be careful of the double let down by loading too much $ on them as well. Grab that ML and GL to your boys
0
Boom....nice writeup and I agree the orange is the side tonight but my advise for you is to tread lightly. no way that your expertise on your team does NOT cloud your vision a little bit....
Enjoy the fact that your squad is almost to the promised land but be careful of the double let down by loading too much $ on them as well. Grab that ML and GL to your boys
All I have to say is I've been riding the ACC moneytrain this post season, not stopping now.. they been covering and winning SU as dogs big time.. BC, wake, Nc St, Unc, The U, Fla st, Clemson all won outright and/or covered.. Clemson wins by 4 tonite 27-23
0
All I have to say is I've been riding the ACC moneytrain this post season, not stopping now.. they been covering and winning SU as dogs big time.. BC, wake, Nc St, Unc, The U, Fla st, Clemson all won outright and/or covered.. Clemson wins by 4 tonite 27-23
GREAT THREAD!!!!! Boom, whats your favorite PROP of the game?? Clemson Team total Over 21.5?? Mike Williams scoring -110?? ETC...Ther are some good ones...
0
GREAT THREAD!!!!! Boom, whats your favorite PROP of the game?? Clemson Team total Over 21.5?? Mike Williams scoring -110?? ETC...Ther are some good ones...
I'll say this, historically, when Saban sees a QB that has done well against him for the second time. It doesn't turn out well. Ask Tebow, Dobbs, or Dak. The difference for me is Bama pass rush and Deshaun trying to do too much. I agree that Watson is as talented as anyone but he makes a lot of bad decisions(look at his int's) Tonight, he'll throw 3 ints and Bama will run run run...34-16 Bama
Good Luck ALL!!!
0
Valid points...(its Minkah btw)
I'll say this, historically, when Saban sees a QB that has done well against him for the second time. It doesn't turn out well. Ask Tebow, Dobbs, or Dak. The difference for me is Bama pass rush and Deshaun trying to do too much. I agree that Watson is as talented as anyone but he makes a lot of bad decisions(look at his int's) Tonight, he'll throw 3 ints and Bama will run run run...34-16 Bama
I'll say this, historically, when Saban sees a QB that has done well against him for the second time. It doesn't turn out well. Ask Tebow, Dobbs, or Dak.
Right -- it doesn't turn out well for Saban. Manziel beats Bama 29-24? The next year Manziel's Aggies score 42. Kelly beats Bama 43-37 with a lot of luck? The next year (aka "this year") his Rebels score 43 without any luck.
0
Quote Originally Posted by sagsmore:
Valid points...(its Minkah btw)
I'll say this, historically, when Saban sees a QB that has done well against him for the second time. It doesn't turn out well. Ask Tebow, Dobbs, or Dak.
Right -- it doesn't turn out well for Saban. Manziel beats Bama 29-24? The next year Manziel's Aggies score 42. Kelly beats Bama 43-37 with a lot of luck? The next year (aka "this year") his Rebels score 43 without any luck.
Boom....nice writeup and I agree the orange is the side tonight but my advise for you is to tread lightly. no way that your expertise on your team does NOT cloud your vision a little bit....
Enjoy the fact that your squad is almost to the promised land but be careful of the double let down by loading too much $ on them as well. Grab that ML and GL to your boys
Johnny -
I completely disagree man.... I have been good or as good as anybody analyzing college football consistently for many years.
BOL Tonight either you go
0
Quote Originally Posted by Johnnynumbers:
Boom....nice writeup and I agree the orange is the side tonight but my advise for you is to tread lightly. no way that your expertise on your team does NOT cloud your vision a little bit....
Enjoy the fact that your squad is almost to the promised land but be careful of the double let down by loading too much $ on them as well. Grab that ML and GL to your boys
Johnny -
I completely disagree man.... I have been good or as good as anybody analyzing college football consistently for many years.
GREAT THREAD!!!!! Boom, whats your favorite PROP of the game?? Clemson Team total Over 21.5?? Mike Williams scoring -110?? ETC...Ther are some good ones...
I don't typically get into prop bets... I do like that Williams bet tho
0
Quote Originally Posted by 1pumpchump:
GREAT THREAD!!!!! Boom, whats your favorite PROP of the game?? Clemson Team total Over 21.5?? Mike Williams scoring -110?? ETC...Ther are some good ones...
I don't typically get into prop bets... I do like that Williams bet tho
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.