I'm thinking Michigan too physical, better coaching, and better talent, but 10 points ? My large teaser is Michigan -3 coupled with UCLA +14. Your thoughts ?
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I'm thinking Michigan too physical, better coaching, and better talent, but 10 points ? My large teaser is Michigan -3 coupled with UCLA +14. Your thoughts ?
Put Michigan in with your other favorites and parlay them together. That game will not be within 17 points. Michigan's defense is too fast, athletic, and physical for Purdue to do much on offense. They won't score more than 17.
That means Michigan has to score 28 or more to win. Do you really think they are going to be as bad this week in the red zone as they were last week?
Purdue didn't become a power program over one offseason. They are outmanned at every position and it will show during the game.
Final score will be 38-17.
0
Put Michigan in with your other favorites and parlay them together. That game will not be within 17 points. Michigan's defense is too fast, athletic, and physical for Purdue to do much on offense. They won't score more than 17.
That means Michigan has to score 28 or more to win. Do you really think they are going to be as bad this week in the red zone as they were last week?
Purdue didn't become a power program over one offseason. They are outmanned at every position and it will show during the game.
After watching them struggle against Florida, I said ok... I'll give them another shot before I fade them... then I watched them struggle against Air Force, so I'm all over Purdue (who I watched completely dismantle a good Missouri team with one of the best QBs in the SEC) I'm all over Purdue +10
0
After watching them struggle against Florida, I said ok... I'll give them another shot before I fade them... then I watched them struggle against Air Force, so I'm all over Purdue (who I watched completely dismantle a good Missouri team with one of the best QBs in the SEC) I'm all over Purdue +10
After watching them struggle against Florida, I said ok... I'll give them another shot before I fade them... then I watched them struggle against Air Force, so I'm all over Purdue (who I watched completely dismantle a good Missouri team with one of the best QBs in the SEC) I'm all over Purdue +10
News Flash! Michigan didn't struggle against Florida. They dominated them. Florida was lucky to lose by only 16. Michigan outgained Florida over 2-1.
News Flash! Missouri sucks
0
Quote Originally Posted by Tappy:
After watching them struggle against Florida, I said ok... I'll give them another shot before I fade them... then I watched them struggle against Air Force, so I'm all over Purdue (who I watched completely dismantle a good Missouri team with one of the best QBs in the SEC) I'm all over Purdue +10
News Flash! Michigan didn't struggle against Florida. They dominated them. Florida was lucky to lose by only 16. Michigan outgained Florida over 2-1.
After watching them struggle against Florida, I said ok... I'll give them another shot before I fade them... then I watched them struggle against Air Force, so I'm all over Purdue (who I watched completely dismantle a good Missouri team with one of the best QBs in the SEC) I'm all over Purdue +10
News Flash! Michigan didn't struggle against Florida. They dominated them. Florida was lucky to lose by only 16. Michigan outgained Florida over 2-1.News Flash! Missouri sucks
News flash... Florida was winning at half time, and if they have an offense, which they don't (worst in the SEC), Michigan gets it first loss.
News flash... Missouri has one of the best QBs in the nation, and Purdue shut him down... Their defense sucks bit their offense put up 74 points week 1.
0
Quote Originally Posted by mbialowas:
Quote Originally Posted by Tappy:
After watching them struggle against Florida, I said ok... I'll give them another shot before I fade them... then I watched them struggle against Air Force, so I'm all over Purdue (who I watched completely dismantle a good Missouri team with one of the best QBs in the SEC) I'm all over Purdue +10
News Flash! Michigan didn't struggle against Florida. They dominated them. Florida was lucky to lose by only 16. Michigan outgained Florida over 2-1.News Flash! Missouri sucks
News flash... Florida was winning at half time, and if they have an offense, which they don't (worst in the SEC), Michigan gets it first loss.
News flash... Missouri has one of the best QBs in the nation, and Purdue shut him down... Their defense sucks bit their offense put up 74 points week 1.
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. I don't think Drew Lock is one of the best QBs in the nation. 12 for 28 last week with 133 yds and 2 ints last week against a middle of the pack BIG10 team isn't good. I can't wait to see what he does against some SEC defenses.
0
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. I don't think Drew Lock is one of the best QBs in the nation. 12 for 28 last week with 133 yds and 2 ints last week against a middle of the pack BIG10 team isn't good. I can't wait to see what he does against some SEC defenses.
I'm thinking Michigan too physical, better coaching, and better talent, but 10 points ? My large teaser is Michigan -3 coupled with UCLA +14. Your thoughts ?
better coaching really ? The Purdue coach takes on jobs with bad teams and makes them good
Harbaugh just has the NFL name and has an edge in recruiting because of it both him and his brother are so overrated it's laughable i think they both suck ...Calhoun out coached him last week
0
Quote Originally Posted by haydenvalley:
I'm thinking Michigan too physical, better coaching, and better talent, but 10 points ? My large teaser is Michigan -3 coupled with UCLA +14. Your thoughts ?
better coaching really ? The Purdue coach takes on jobs with bad teams and makes them good
Harbaugh just has the NFL name and has an edge in recruiting because of it both him and his brother are so overrated it's laughable i think they both suck ...Calhoun out coached him last week
I'm thinking Michigan too physical, better coaching, and better talent, but 10 points ? My large teaser is Michigan -3 coupled with UCLA +14. Your thoughts ?
better coaching really ? The Purdue coach takes on jobs with bad teams and makes them good Harbaugh just has the NFL name and has an edge in recruiting because of it both him and his brother are so overrated it's laughable i think they both suck ...Calhoun out coached him last week
Building up Stanford into a consistent top 25 team and getting a lowly 49er team to the super bowl? Lol whatever you say
0
Quote Originally Posted by Steinway:
Quote Originally Posted by haydenvalley:
I'm thinking Michigan too physical, better coaching, and better talent, but 10 points ? My large teaser is Michigan -3 coupled with UCLA +14. Your thoughts ?
better coaching really ? The Purdue coach takes on jobs with bad teams and makes them good Harbaugh just has the NFL name and has an edge in recruiting because of it both him and his brother are so overrated it's laughable i think they both suck ...Calhoun out coached him last week
Building up Stanford into a consistent top 25 team and getting a lowly 49er team to the super bowl? Lol whatever you say
If you like Michigan this week I can understand why.
Just realize that you are picking a Michigan team that fails to cover at a 55% rate so the odds are slightly against you and long term Betting Michigan you will end up in the poor house not the Big House.
If you bet on Michigan as an away favorite since 1987 ( proven again and again over a long period of time) with lines between -5 and -13 your odds get even worse.
Nothing is ever in the bank until it is in the bank
0
If you like Michigan this week I can understand why.
Just realize that you are picking a Michigan team that fails to cover at a 55% rate so the odds are slightly against you and long term Betting Michigan you will end up in the poor house not the Big House.
If you bet on Michigan as an away favorite since 1987 ( proven again and again over a long period of time) with lines between -5 and -13 your odds get even worse.
better coaching really ? The Purdue coach takes on jobs with bad teams and makes them good Harbaugh just has the NFL name and has an edge in recruiting because of it both him and his brother are so overrated it's laughable i think they both suck ...Calhoun out coached him last week Building up Stanford into a consistent top 25 team and getting a lowly 49er team to the super bowl? Lol whatever you say
Seriously 99.9% of all coaches would have made Stanford a top 25 team with Andrew Luck .
0
Quote Originally Posted by Savagepatchkids:
better coaching really ? The Purdue coach takes on jobs with bad teams and makes them good Harbaugh just has the NFL name and has an edge in recruiting because of it both him and his brother are so overrated it's laughable i think they both suck ...Calhoun out coached him last week Building up Stanford into a consistent top 25 team and getting a lowly 49er team to the super bowl? Lol whatever you say
Seriously 99.9% of all coaches would have made Stanford a top 25 team with Andrew Luck .
i like purdue too but haven't made the bet. i think they look physically tougher this year and not as finesse. 10 pts is kinda tight though and michigan has a way of wearing teams down in the second half.
0
i like purdue too but haven't made the bet. i think they look physically tougher this year and not as finesse. 10 pts is kinda tight though and michigan has a way of wearing teams down in the second half.
After watching them struggle against Florida, I said ok... I'll give them another shot before I fade them... then I watched them struggle against Air Force, so I'm all over Purdue (who I watched completely dismantle a good Missouri team with one of the best QBs in the SEC) I'm all over Purdue +10
You keep saying Michigan struggled against Florida, give me examples of how they struggled? They dominated that game outside of two early pick sixes.
You've been hot, but I think you're on the wrong side of this one.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Tappy:
After watching them struggle against Florida, I said ok... I'll give them another shot before I fade them... then I watched them struggle against Air Force, so I'm all over Purdue (who I watched completely dismantle a good Missouri team with one of the best QBs in the SEC) I'm all over Purdue +10
You keep saying Michigan struggled against Florida, give me examples of how they struggled? They dominated that game outside of two early pick sixes.
You've been hot, but I think you're on the wrong side of this one.
You are RIGHT, Butta4 ! What do you think of UCLA +14 on the tease ?
Stanford is such a strange team this year, but so is UCLA. How is the UCLA rush defense so bad? Memphis ran all over UCLA, and Stanford is still a good rushing team. Stanford can't stop anyone doing anything...
It I were to pick a side here on a teaser it would be UCLA +14, but I think teasing the Over down to 52 on the total might be better. Neither team can stop the other's strength which usually leads to high point totals.
0
Quote Originally Posted by haydenvalley:
You are RIGHT, Butta4 ! What do you think of UCLA +14 on the tease ?
Stanford is such a strange team this year, but so is UCLA. How is the UCLA rush defense so bad? Memphis ran all over UCLA, and Stanford is still a good rushing team. Stanford can't stop anyone doing anything...
It I were to pick a side here on a teaser it would be UCLA +14, but I think teasing the Over down to 52 on the total might be better. Neither team can stop the other's strength which usually leads to high point totals.
I love this spot for Michigan. Michigan showing that they have been "struggling" the first two games yet they won with ease. Did they cover? Nope. They are 0-2 ATS. Harbaugh is the type of guy who picks his spots and he is a master motivator; probably a top 3 in all of college. Why is this important for this game? Purdue looks good right? They have played two solid games thus far and are getting 10 at home? Seems like a no brainer huh?I will say this: if you don't think harbaugh, the staff and the players aren't going to be ready for this game, you all are nuts. Keep sleeping on this Michigan team. Keep thinking their offense can't put up points. Just wait. Speight will get it together this week and watch out for that running game. Were you expecting Michigan to blow both teams out so far? They are 2-0 and in a conference game, it's time to rock and roll. I think Michigan wins by 20 tomorrow and I think we see their offense shut a lot of people up. As for the defense, I'm not sure if I've seen too many so far that are better. If Purdue can't run tomorrow, it will be a massacre and harbaugh knows that. I love their coaching and in this type of game, it weighs heavily. I will be slamming Michigan in this spot and expect them to get their first ATS win this season.
0
I love this spot for Michigan. Michigan showing that they have been "struggling" the first two games yet they won with ease. Did they cover? Nope. They are 0-2 ATS. Harbaugh is the type of guy who picks his spots and he is a master motivator; probably a top 3 in all of college. Why is this important for this game? Purdue looks good right? They have played two solid games thus far and are getting 10 at home? Seems like a no brainer huh?I will say this: if you don't think harbaugh, the staff and the players aren't going to be ready for this game, you all are nuts. Keep sleeping on this Michigan team. Keep thinking their offense can't put up points. Just wait. Speight will get it together this week and watch out for that running game. Were you expecting Michigan to blow both teams out so far? They are 2-0 and in a conference game, it's time to rock and roll. I think Michigan wins by 20 tomorrow and I think we see their offense shut a lot of people up. As for the defense, I'm not sure if I've seen too many so far that are better. If Purdue can't run tomorrow, it will be a massacre and harbaugh knows that. I love their coaching and in this type of game, it weighs heavily. I will be slamming Michigan in this spot and expect them to get their first ATS win this season.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.