Like i said, D Rob is one of my favorite college athletes, I've watched his games this year he is electric, I just have yet to see him to his team to a victory when it's a huge game like this. First game on the road last week they were down 10 to Northwestern.. This isn't Northwestern this week and its not just a good team. It's a good team at home in one of their biggest games of the year. I think they pull it out but it'll be a good one to watch good luck everybody!
0
Like i said, D Rob is one of my favorite college athletes, I've watched his games this year he is electric, I just have yet to see him to his team to a victory when it's a huge game like this. First game on the road last week they were down 10 to Northwestern.. This isn't Northwestern this week and its not just a good team. It's a good team at home in one of their biggest games of the year. I think they pull it out but it'll be a good one to watch good luck everybody!
As long as Shoelace has less than 4 INTs Michigan should be able to win this one. Michigan State has done nothing to impress me this year and now that Michigan is giving up less than 1500 yards a game they should be able to cover this guy.
Got Mich at +3.
0
As long as Shoelace has less than 4 INTs Michigan should be able to win this one. Michigan State has done nothing to impress me this year and now that Michigan is giving up less than 1500 yards a game they should be able to cover this guy.
OSU didn't seem to have any issues scoring the following week at Nebraska.. 27 points in 2.5 quarters before Miller got hurt..
And again, ND, yes 31 points against, but only 270 total yards against, the Irish's lowest output by far of the season.. 31 points came from kickoff return and couple TO's that set up Irish with short field
Buckeyes got Mike Adams back for Nebraska and it changed positions for a few buckeye lineman. Bucks ran the ball better and B Mill had more lanes to scramble in. Adding that one lineman and changing many others may or may not have helped. The bucks play calling is bad. With that said I still remember the second half collapses Mich st has had in the past. They have beat Michigan 3 times in a row in a rivalry dominated by the Wolves. Will be a close game but I like the Hokey Pokey to break the streak. He knows the importance of taking this rivalry back, and even if i'm wrong well Go Bucks you get the picture.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SatNightFever05:
OSU didn't seem to have any issues scoring the following week at Nebraska.. 27 points in 2.5 quarters before Miller got hurt..
And again, ND, yes 31 points against, but only 270 total yards against, the Irish's lowest output by far of the season.. 31 points came from kickoff return and couple TO's that set up Irish with short field
Buckeyes got Mike Adams back for Nebraska and it changed positions for a few buckeye lineman. Bucks ran the ball better and B Mill had more lanes to scramble in. Adding that one lineman and changing many others may or may not have helped. The bucks play calling is bad. With that said I still remember the second half collapses Mich st has had in the past. They have beat Michigan 3 times in a row in a rivalry dominated by the Wolves. Will be a close game but I like the Hokey Pokey to break the streak. He knows the importance of taking this rivalry back, and even if i'm wrong well Go Bucks you get the picture.
Haha! You ain't kiddin. As much as Denard throws some good passes (every now and again) I feel like I am watching Bret Farve when I watch him play. When the ball goes in the air, I'm waiting for the camera to pan so I can see where the DB is in relation to the reciever b/c I have no idea where the ball is going. It's like you hold your breath every time the pass goes up. Farve was the same way. As much as he made unreal throws, you just shook your head at some of the idiotic passes he made... (no comparison to Farve other than that though...let me make that clear... ).
I 100% agree with you on both MSU's D-line and the back end. This will be the best, most complete Defense they face for certain.
I think two things are in Michigan's favor. The fact that Hoke has really put stress on this game (a complete failure by Rich Rod), which should produce much more fiesty play and a sense of urgency from the players; and (2) Al Borges/Mattison are much better at in-game adjustments (another failure by Rich Rod's staff).
In the end, I just don't know if UM has the horses yet. I think they will be overwhelmed in the trenches, which, as you said, what happens when Drob has to throw consistently on 3 & long? As I said in my previous post, Cousins & company have to give the Wolverines a couple gift turnovers in order for Michigan to win (much like ND did). If MSU takes care of the football, sustains long drives, I don't see Michigan winning.
0
Sat night.
Haha! You ain't kiddin. As much as Denard throws some good passes (every now and again) I feel like I am watching Bret Farve when I watch him play. When the ball goes in the air, I'm waiting for the camera to pan so I can see where the DB is in relation to the reciever b/c I have no idea where the ball is going. It's like you hold your breath every time the pass goes up. Farve was the same way. As much as he made unreal throws, you just shook your head at some of the idiotic passes he made... (no comparison to Farve other than that though...let me make that clear... ).
I 100% agree with you on both MSU's D-line and the back end. This will be the best, most complete Defense they face for certain.
I think two things are in Michigan's favor. The fact that Hoke has really put stress on this game (a complete failure by Rich Rod), which should produce much more fiesty play and a sense of urgency from the players; and (2) Al Borges/Mattison are much better at in-game adjustments (another failure by Rich Rod's staff).
In the end, I just don't know if UM has the horses yet. I think they will be overwhelmed in the trenches, which, as you said, what happens when Drob has to throw consistently on 3 & long? As I said in my previous post, Cousins & company have to give the Wolverines a couple gift turnovers in order for Michigan to win (much like ND did). If MSU takes care of the football, sustains long drives, I don't see Michigan winning.
For those wondering Im on Michigan +3.5 (-114)....after looking into MSU more. They have not beaten a better team than UM. And their vaunted defensive stats are against below average to average offenses (sans ND).
0
For those wondering Im on Michigan +3.5 (-114)....after looking into MSU more. They have not beaten a better team than UM. And their vaunted defensive stats are against below average to average offenses (sans ND).
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
