Yeah man.. My old man passed away September 11th of last year. We had the whole military funeral and everything ( Vietnam Vet )...
I dont ever hide my emotions when I talk about my dad. My dad was my best friend and he and I were like 2 of a kind. Thought the same, had the same interests and just really enjoyed each others company.
0
Quote Originally Posted by 44-dimes:
Humbling story about you and your old man
Yeah man.. My old man passed away September 11th of last year. We had the whole military funeral and everything ( Vietnam Vet )...
I dont ever hide my emotions when I talk about my dad. My dad was my best friend and he and I were like 2 of a kind. Thought the same, had the same interests and just really enjoyed each others company.
hey boom.. isnt gamecock defense really decent and what holds em in games and their offense(garcia) terrible? isnt this a recipe for UNDER? love to pick your brain on this one
0
hey boom.. isnt gamecock defense really decent and what holds em in games and their offense(garcia) terrible? isnt this a recipe for UNDER? love to pick your brain on this one
250 - Take it for what it's worth... my reputation of betting on Clemson football has been solid through the years. You have seen me betting on them a lot here recently... Why? There hot!! What do you do when a teams hot? I know when to pull the trigger on them and when not to.
Krazy - Yeah...
Foman - No thought on it... Michigan isn't consistent enough for to bet on right now from a week to week deal... I have cashed in on there under totals tho..
Johnny - I think the SEC is the best overall conference... I just know how to pull those guys chains... But they do hate it when I tell the truth about them or there conference... But the love me when I talk about how good there team is... WHAT CAN YOU DO
Milkman - I will say this . Blacks burg is tough. Now ask yourself this.. Who has the better QB? who has the better RB's? Who has the better WR? Who ha the Better OL? Get it?? I think you will find most of the answers to be for Clemson. Just saying
0
EVERYONE
250 - Take it for what it's worth... my reputation of betting on Clemson football has been solid through the years. You have seen me betting on them a lot here recently... Why? There hot!! What do you do when a teams hot? I know when to pull the trigger on them and when not to.
Krazy - Yeah...
Foman - No thought on it... Michigan isn't consistent enough for to bet on right now from a week to week deal... I have cashed in on there under totals tho..
Johnny - I think the SEC is the best overall conference... I just know how to pull those guys chains... But they do hate it when I tell the truth about them or there conference... But the love me when I talk about how good there team is... WHAT CAN YOU DO
Milkman - I will say this . Blacks burg is tough. Now ask yourself this.. Who has the better QB? who has the better RB's? Who has the better WR? Who ha the Better OL? Get it?? I think you will find most of the answers to be for Clemson. Just saying
I have been on the boards for quite sometime and you do a nice job, i do not advocate your style of betting so many games but it works for you i GUESS :)
It appears that you always have 2-3 units plays, do they go any higher? For example your comments on Ucla possibly sqeaking out str8 up victory this week would lead me to believe that the 20,5 pts would have to be icing only and that this would be by far your strongest play yet you only give it your lowest unit count of 2 for this week?
I am trying to better understand your methods for placing units. Normally flat betting works best but I see very few people on here do that.
Do you ever post capping info and stats with your plays? Dont get me wrong I am not second guessing anything (no disrespect) as your record bodes very well for itself.
Thanks
Pitbull666
This is the biggest lie people can tell you. Betting on less games doesn't prove shit. I have proven that betting on 10 - 15 games a week for several several years is profitable.
I dont increase my bets. I play anywhere from 1.5 to 3...every now and then I play a 4 or 5 play. ( units =$100 )
Why? Because I have a " plan "...and I know that through time I will be successful with playing what I believe is the right way. I dont get over excited about a win and down on myself on a loss.
0
Quote Originally Posted by pitbull666:
Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:
Thursday - Saturday
Georgia Tech -10.5 3 units
Clemson + 7 2 units
Auburn + 11.5 2 units
Texas -10 2 units
Alabama -3.5 2 units
UCLA +20.5 2 units
Auburn / S.C Over 59.5 2.5 units
Clemson / V.T Over 49 2 units
Nebraska / Wisconsin Under 56 2 units
Alabama / Florida Under 44.5 2 units
Will play two more games.........
Boom,
A couple of questions, what are your units worth?
I have been on the boards for quite sometime and you do a nice job, i do not advocate your style of betting so many games but it works for you i GUESS :)
It appears that you always have 2-3 units plays, do they go any higher? For example your comments on Ucla possibly sqeaking out str8 up victory this week would lead me to believe that the 20,5 pts would have to be icing only and that this would be by far your strongest play yet you only give it your lowest unit count of 2 for this week?
I am trying to better understand your methods for placing units. Normally flat betting works best but I see very few people on here do that.
Do you ever post capping info and stats with your plays? Dont get me wrong I am not second guessing anything (no disrespect) as your record bodes very well for itself.
Thanks
Pitbull666
This is the biggest lie people can tell you. Betting on less games doesn't prove shit. I have proven that betting on 10 - 15 games a week for several several years is profitable.
I dont increase my bets. I play anywhere from 1.5 to 3...every now and then I play a 4 or 5 play. ( units =$100 )
Why? Because I have a " plan "...and I know that through time I will be successful with playing what I believe is the right way. I dont get over excited about a win and down on myself on a loss.
hey boom.. isnt gamecock defense really decent and what holds em in games and their offense(garcia) terrible? isnt this a recipe for UNDER? love to pick your brain on this one
Gamecock defense is bad. trust me on this... Auburn will come damn close on winning this game.
0
Quote Originally Posted by mariner24:
hey boom.. isnt gamecock defense really decent and what holds em in games and their offense(garcia) terrible? isnt this a recipe for UNDER? love to pick your brain on this one
Gamecock defense is bad. trust me on this... Auburn will come damn close on winning this game.
Hey Boom , who do you like in the Neb/WIsky game? Its at -9 now and i didn't want to see too much more love being put on the Badgers to drive the number to DD's. I took them at -9. I just havent seen much from Nebraska this season. They gave up 444 yards to Fresno St. at home and 420 to Washington. I just don't see any way they stop this scary Wisconsin offense.
0
Hey Boom , who do you like in the Neb/WIsky game? Its at -9 now and i didn't want to see too much more love being put on the Badgers to drive the number to DD's. I took them at -9. I just havent seen much from Nebraska this season. They gave up 444 yards to Fresno St. at home and 420 to Washington. I just don't see any way they stop this scary Wisconsin offense.
boom i no ur rep for clemson has been great just asking if that was your strongest total this week or do you like betting clemson games for more units bc their your team
0
boom i no ur rep for clemson has been great just asking if that was your strongest total this week or do you like betting clemson games for more units bc their your team
Hey Boom , who do you like in the Neb/WIsky game? Its at -9 now and i didn't want to see too much more love being put on the Badgers to drive the number to DD's. I took them at -9. I just havent seen much from Nebraska this season. They gave up 444 yards to Fresno St. at home and 420 to Washington. I just don't see any way they stop this scary Wisconsin offense.
I think Wisconsin is going to win the game.. I do think it will be a low scoring game. 24 - 17 type game . I t will be closer than most expect.
0
Quote Originally Posted by infmus02:
Hey Boom , who do you like in the Neb/WIsky game? Its at -9 now and i didn't want to see too much more love being put on the Badgers to drive the number to DD's. I took them at -9. I just havent seen much from Nebraska this season. They gave up 444 yards to Fresno St. at home and 420 to Washington. I just don't see any way they stop this scary Wisconsin offense.
I think Wisconsin is going to win the game.. I do think it will be a low scoring game. 24 - 17 type game . I t will be closer than most expect.
boom i no ur rep for clemson has been great just asking if that was your strongest total this week or do you like betting clemson games for more units bc their your team
nah.. I think the Auburn / Sc over is the best total bet this week. Look Clemson is scoring points and giving points up right now... Lets see this change before we jump ship on it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by 250:
boom i no ur rep for clemson has been great just asking if that was your strongest total this week or do you like betting clemson games for more units bc their your team
nah.. I think the Auburn / Sc over is the best total bet this week. Look Clemson is scoring points and giving points up right now... Lets see this change before we jump ship on it.
Hey Boom , who do you like in the Neb/WIsky game? Its at -9 now and i didn't want to see too much more love being put on the Badgers to drive the number to DD's. I took them at -9. I just havent seen much from Nebraska this season. They gave up 444 yards to Fresno St. at home and 420 to Washington. I just don't see any way they stop this scary Wisconsin offense.
This scary Wisconsin offense just played 4 cupcakes including a High School team from South Dakota last week. Nebraska has not shown anything this year but this will not be a walk in the park for the Badgers.
0
Quote Originally Posted by infmus02:
Hey Boom , who do you like in the Neb/WIsky game? Its at -9 now and i didn't want to see too much more love being put on the Badgers to drive the number to DD's. I took them at -9. I just havent seen much from Nebraska this season. They gave up 444 yards to Fresno St. at home and 420 to Washington. I just don't see any way they stop this scary Wisconsin offense.
This scary Wisconsin offense just played 4 cupcakes including a High School team from South Dakota last week. Nebraska has not shown anything this year but this will not be a walk in the park for the Badgers.
How do you feel about KState/Baylor over 63 and Air Force/Navy under 53.5?
KState vs Baylor last year almost hit 90 and neither team looks better on defense this year. Navy vs Air Force has gone under 6 of last 7 times and both teams run all game causing the clock to run with time consuming drives.
Thoughts?
0
Boom,
How do you feel about KState/Baylor over 63 and Air Force/Navy under 53.5?
KState vs Baylor last year almost hit 90 and neither team looks better on defense this year. Navy vs Air Force has gone under 6 of last 7 times and both teams run all game causing the clock to run with time consuming drives.
How do you feel about KState/Baylor over 63 and Air Force/Navy under 53.5?
KState vs Baylor last year almost hit 90 and neither team looks better on defense this year. Navy vs Air Force has gone under 6 of last 7 times and both teams run all game causing the clock to run with time consuming drives.
Thoughts?
Kst is going to have problems scoring against Baylor. Plus we are without Daniel Thomas, who was an animal last year. I'm a Kst Alum, and to be honest, I like Baylor in this spot. The only thing we have going for us this year, is an "ok" defense.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BigShotBill:
Boom,
How do you feel about KState/Baylor over 63 and Air Force/Navy under 53.5?
KState vs Baylor last year almost hit 90 and neither team looks better on defense this year. Navy vs Air Force has gone under 6 of last 7 times and both teams run all game causing the clock to run with time consuming drives.
Thoughts?
Kst is going to have problems scoring against Baylor. Plus we are without Daniel Thomas, who was an animal last year. I'm a Kst Alum, and to be honest, I like Baylor in this spot. The only thing we have going for us this year, is an "ok" defense.
This is the biggest lie people can tell you. Betting on less games doesn't prove shit. I have proven that betting on 10 - 15 games a week for several several years is profitable.
I dont increase my bets. I play anywhere from 1.5 to 3...every now and then I play a 4 or 5 play. ( units =$100 )
Why? Because I have a " plan "...and I know that through time I will be successful with playing what I believe is the right way. I dont get over excited about a win and down on myself on a loss.
I think the reason why most gamblers that bet on a large card don't succeed is because they are addictive gamblers who force plays. I think Boom picks his plays based on stats, injuries, trends, ect.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:
This is the biggest lie people can tell you. Betting on less games doesn't prove shit. I have proven that betting on 10 - 15 games a week for several several years is profitable.
I dont increase my bets. I play anywhere from 1.5 to 3...every now and then I play a 4 or 5 play. ( units =$100 )
Why? Because I have a " plan "...and I know that through time I will be successful with playing what I believe is the right way. I dont get over excited about a win and down on myself on a loss.
I think the reason why most gamblers that bet on a large card don't succeed is because they are addictive gamblers who force plays. I think Boom picks his plays based on stats, injuries, trends, ect.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.