good stuff mega i always gotta stop here and read your brilliant work
thx man. appreciate the kind words Just have mercy on our souls when we have our usual 3-week cold streak where money goes to die
thx man. appreciate the kind words Just have mercy on our souls when we have our usual 3-week cold streak where money goes to die
thx man. appreciate the kind words Just have mercy on our souls when we have our usual 3-week cold streak where money goes to die
Final note on the Ball St game.
We will note that if you guys want - like we said earlier - NW TT under 35 is also a good play. We have NW scoring 36+ only 33% of the time; NW covering -20 about 40% of the time. We posted the +20 knowing that everyone can get that line if they choose.
Remember tho - we also loved E Michigan to go over last wk so our process finds bad picks more than occasionally !!!......NW winning 38-10 is entirely possible.
GL guys
Final note on the Ball St game.
We will note that if you guys want - like we said earlier - NW TT under 35 is also a good play. We have NW scoring 36+ only 33% of the time; NW covering -20 about 40% of the time. We posted the +20 knowing that everyone can get that line if they choose.
Remember tho - we also loved E Michigan to go over last wk so our process finds bad picks more than occasionally !!!......NW winning 38-10 is entirely possible.
GL guys
Storm great to see you around....Picks been ok but really enjoying the questions and discussion too great - GL
tnt haaaaaaaaaaaa
well - you haven't lived until you have tried goat porn with midgets
Storm great to see you around....Picks been ok but really enjoying the questions and discussion too great - GL
tnt haaaaaaaaaaaa
well - you haven't lived until you have tried goat porn with midgets
We are humbled. Somewhat disturbed. But mostly flattered
Guys - hit me up if you want us to check out a few more games later today.
We are humbled. Somewhat disturbed. But mostly flattered
Guys - hit me up if you want us to check out a few more games later today.
Already addressed a couple of pages back...
IMO, it's a great situational spot to catch Stanford coming off a signature win vs USC. Not to mention the look-ahead spot with Zona on deck at home.
Classic sandwich/letdown spot tonight
Good thread.
Already addressed a couple of pages back...
IMO, it's a great situational spot to catch Stanford coming off a signature win vs USC. Not to mention the look-ahead spot with Zona on deck at home.
Classic sandwich/letdown spot tonight
Good thread.
Papa
I am worried about every pick I make. There are more than a few things that make me worry about this game We would be worried if we had Ball St ML. Or Ball St +10. There is risk in taking Ball St and a realistic chance they don't cover - but we feel it is a good play based on the line of +20. The QB is a true freshman. There are many true and redshirt freshmen nowadays that come in and do a good job. NW QB is a redshirt FR with one TD pass on the season.Yes Ball is missing a couple of starters on D but even late Sept most teams are banged up. From reading Ball St news/notes/coaches stuff they are going to be more than able to put capable guys on the field. The totality of our analysis is what makes us play the game - injuries are typically overrated unless a top QB / crappy backup or a cluster of injuries. And again - we are catching 20 points so it is all about context. Final note - they may also be without one of their top OL for the game . You make very good points as usual but my suggestion is always - if you don't like it - don't play it - or fade it. MTSU vs Bama and UConn last wk vs Mizz had all sorts of doubt in our minds but we just go with our process and its only one game. GL this wk ! keep up the good work. mega
GL, boss. You definitely know what you're doing. Keep up the great work! I may be on Ball State myself. Like the number. Was just curious your thoughts on the injuries.
Papa
I am worried about every pick I make. There are more than a few things that make me worry about this game We would be worried if we had Ball St ML. Or Ball St +10. There is risk in taking Ball St and a realistic chance they don't cover - but we feel it is a good play based on the line of +20. The QB is a true freshman. There are many true and redshirt freshmen nowadays that come in and do a good job. NW QB is a redshirt FR with one TD pass on the season.Yes Ball is missing a couple of starters on D but even late Sept most teams are banged up. From reading Ball St news/notes/coaches stuff they are going to be more than able to put capable guys on the field. The totality of our analysis is what makes us play the game - injuries are typically overrated unless a top QB / crappy backup or a cluster of injuries. And again - we are catching 20 points so it is all about context. Final note - they may also be without one of their top OL for the game . You make very good points as usual but my suggestion is always - if you don't like it - don't play it - or fade it. MTSU vs Bama and UConn last wk vs Mizz had all sorts of doubt in our minds but we just go with our process and its only one game. GL this wk ! keep up the good work. mega
GL, boss. You definitely know what you're doing. Keep up the great work! I may be on Ball State myself. Like the number. Was just curious your thoughts on the injuries.
GL, boss. You definitely know what you're doing. Keep up the great work! I may be on Ball State myself. Like the number. Was just curious your thoughts on the injuries.
THANKS man - you know I appreciate you bringing those injuries and QB issues up - seriously - that is nothing to just brush aside...We hope we are getting enough points GL !
GL, boss. You definitely know what you're doing. Keep up the great work! I may be on Ball State myself. Like the number. Was just curious your thoughts on the injuries.
THANKS man - you know I appreciate you bringing those injuries and QB issues up - seriously - that is nothing to just brush aside...We hope we are getting enough points GL !
Hey buddy...I really like VT at the opener around -4 on Sunday - just missed it was paying attention to other games - once it got to 7 I lost interest b/c I do not trust VT QB situation on the road (maybe I should?) and I know this is a big game for EC. I am taking a pass on this one due to my unfamiliarity with EC right now / potential weather issues / and VT has ACC on deck....Gun to the head would roll with EC but would want 10 maybe game day it pops back up.....GL !
Hey buddy...I really like VT at the opener around -4 on Sunday - just missed it was paying attention to other games - once it got to 7 I lost interest b/c I do not trust VT QB situation on the road (maybe I should?) and I know this is a big game for EC. I am taking a pass on this one due to my unfamiliarity with EC right now / potential weather issues / and VT has ACC on deck....Gun to the head would roll with EC but would want 10 maybe game day it pops back up.....GL !
Already addressed a couple of pages back...
IMO, it's a great situational spot to catch Stanford coming off a signature win vs USC. Not to mention the look-ahead spot with Zona on deck at home.
Classic sandwich/letdown spot tonight
Good thread.
thanks a lot Lucrative !!- appreciate it very much Agree with your Oregon St take. GL !
aggregate
noname
pecador Boise game so tough to get a read on for us - Just keep thinking about the massive coaching edge dominating Crowd Will Be Rocking Guy. GL !
rico - sick request dude ....I will take a look at that one later buddy.
Already addressed a couple of pages back...
IMO, it's a great situational spot to catch Stanford coming off a signature win vs USC. Not to mention the look-ahead spot with Zona on deck at home.
Classic sandwich/letdown spot tonight
Good thread.
thanks a lot Lucrative !!- appreciate it very much Agree with your Oregon St take. GL !
aggregate
noname
pecador Boise game so tough to get a read on for us - Just keep thinking about the massive coaching edge dominating Crowd Will Be Rocking Guy. GL !
rico - sick request dude ....I will take a look at that one later buddy.
ALL REQUEST LINE IS NOW ON THE AIR
Baylor 34.5 Rice (74.5)
We looked at this one for a long time starting on Sunday night....Just cannot bring ourselves to take Rice in this one even though we originally leaned that way....Baylor off a bye and put up 56 and 66 the first 2 games - Rice is a much better overall team - BUT - their D is pretty subpar and #111 in pass eff D which means 22,000 yds for Baylor QBs no matter who is in the game....Not sold on the Baylor D but do not want to get caught up in one half of watching them vs SMU - kinda like the Cincy backup QB - Covers Talent Evaluator guy noted he sucked vs Miami ohio then threw for 4 miles last night but we digress.....Baylor probably gonna get 55-70 in this game.....We like the Rice QB but just can't play the dog - spread looks a bit high technically but ????
Summary - lean Rice TT over as best bet in that game if 21 or less even better if 20. Should be able to score some.
mega
"because we care"
ALL REQUEST LINE IS NOW ON THE AIR
Baylor 34.5 Rice (74.5)
We looked at this one for a long time starting on Sunday night....Just cannot bring ourselves to take Rice in this one even though we originally leaned that way....Baylor off a bye and put up 56 and 66 the first 2 games - Rice is a much better overall team - BUT - their D is pretty subpar and #111 in pass eff D which means 22,000 yds for Baylor QBs no matter who is in the game....Not sold on the Baylor D but do not want to get caught up in one half of watching them vs SMU - kinda like the Cincy backup QB - Covers Talent Evaluator guy noted he sucked vs Miami ohio then threw for 4 miles last night but we digress.....Baylor probably gonna get 55-70 in this game.....We like the Rice QB but just can't play the dog - spread looks a bit high technically but ????
Summary - lean Rice TT over as best bet in that game if 21 or less even better if 20. Should be able to score some.
mega
"because we care"
ALL REQUEST LINE IS NOW ON THE AIR
Baylor 34.5 Rice (74.5)
We looked at this one for a long time starting on Sunday night....Just cannot bring ourselves to take Rice in this one even though we originally leaned that way....Baylor off a bye and put up 56 and 66 the first 2 games - Rice is a much better overall team - BUT - their D is pretty subpar and #111 in pass eff D which means 22,000 yds for Baylor QBs no matter who is in the game....Not sold on the Baylor D but do not want to get caught up in one half of watching them vs SMU - kinda like the Cincy backup QB - Covers Talent Evaluator guy noted he sucked vs Miami ohio then threw for 4 miles last night but we digress.....Baylor probably gonna get 55-70 in this game.....We like the Rice QB but just can't play the dog - spread looks a bit high technically but ????
Summary - lean Rice TT over as best bet in that game if 21 or less even better if 20. Should be able to score some.
mega
"because we care"
ALL REQUEST LINE IS NOW ON THE AIR
Baylor 34.5 Rice (74.5)
We looked at this one for a long time starting on Sunday night....Just cannot bring ourselves to take Rice in this one even though we originally leaned that way....Baylor off a bye and put up 56 and 66 the first 2 games - Rice is a much better overall team - BUT - their D is pretty subpar and #111 in pass eff D which means 22,000 yds for Baylor QBs no matter who is in the game....Not sold on the Baylor D but do not want to get caught up in one half of watching them vs SMU - kinda like the Cincy backup QB - Covers Talent Evaluator guy noted he sucked vs Miami ohio then threw for 4 miles last night but we digress.....Baylor probably gonna get 55-70 in this game.....We like the Rice QB but just can't play the dog - spread looks a bit high technically but ????
Summary - lean Rice TT over as best bet in that game if 21 or less even better if 20. Should be able to score some.
mega
"because we care"
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.