Wait Scal... so are you saying that Memphis is the right side???
Cause I am thinking with Milton out and the books opening this line at -9.5 says that UCF is the play here. Sucking in all those Memphis backers and laying a trap line. UCF trailed for 3 qtrs almost lost last time they played this season. Memphis +4 looks TOO EASY with Milton out now.
0
Wait Scal... so are you saying that Memphis is the right side???
Cause I am thinking with Milton out and the books opening this line at -9.5 says that UCF is the play here. Sucking in all those Memphis backers and laying a trap line. UCF trailed for 3 qtrs almost lost last time they played this season. Memphis +4 looks TOO EASY with Milton out now.
They played earlier this year @ Memphis and line was UCF -4.5. UCF barely won the game and should have lost the game..Memphis was up 17 in the 2nd quarter. Now no Milton and neutral field game...Line is spot on @ -3.5... Opening line of -9.5 was never available...
Mayweather bet 450000 on
0
They played earlier this year @ Memphis and line was UCF -4.5. UCF barely won the game and should have lost the game..Memphis was up 17 in the 2nd quarter. Now no Milton and neutral field game...Line is spot on @ -3.5... Opening line of -9.5 was never available...
Even without Milton I would lean UCF if the line is below 6. Memphis is a pretty good team but they've lost 4 games. Earlier this year they appeared to have UCF beat at home, the fans were going nuts and everything but they got outscored 14-0 in the 2nd half to lose 31-30. That was the only close call for UCF as they beat everyone else by double digits. This is a home game for UCF and I think they will take care of business even w/o Milton.
0
Even without Milton I would lean UCF if the line is below 6. Memphis is a pretty good team but they've lost 4 games. Earlier this year they appeared to have UCF beat at home, the fans were going nuts and everything but they got outscored 14-0 in the 2nd half to lose 31-30. That was the only close call for UCF as they beat everyone else by double digits. This is a home game for UCF and I think they will take care of business even w/o Milton.
Hoku, it’s very hard for me to believe that a Memphis team up 30-17 at the half (I believe the only time they trailed at the half all year), in the previous match-up this year (granted it was at Memphis), now translates into a 9.5 line or 7 (where it stayed for 2 days) or even 3.5 or 3 without Milton.
Milton is a transformative QB. This backup they have was overwhelmed at times and the defense, inspired by the injury played like the 85 Bears the rest of the game.
Now with Milton out, they opened the line as though he was playing!
4.5 for the first game
6 point swing from road to him
10.5 should have been the line and they shaved it a point!
So now it’s come down precipitously as the public pounded it.
UCF will have to:
1) have another all world defensive performance against an explosive in Memphis team with double revenge
2) And have Mack Jr 5/14 for 80 yards, do it again with his legs and arms
3) And have the running game be at top notch again...
Thats ALOT to ask and honestly, when I saw this one, I played the side at 9.5 and some ML. That’s just me. I think this win streak ends and it’s over for UCF. Its been a world class run.
All because a SF player chop blocks the QB And ended his season and possibly career. He should be suspended. If you watch the play he threw his body into his legs. Get that fu** off the field. I know guys will see it differently but that’s how I felt.
0
Hoku, it’s very hard for me to believe that a Memphis team up 30-17 at the half (I believe the only time they trailed at the half all year), in the previous match-up this year (granted it was at Memphis), now translates into a 9.5 line or 7 (where it stayed for 2 days) or even 3.5 or 3 without Milton.
Milton is a transformative QB. This backup they have was overwhelmed at times and the defense, inspired by the injury played like the 85 Bears the rest of the game.
Now with Milton out, they opened the line as though he was playing!
4.5 for the first game
6 point swing from road to him
10.5 should have been the line and they shaved it a point!
So now it’s come down precipitously as the public pounded it.
UCF will have to:
1) have another all world defensive performance against an explosive in Memphis team with double revenge
2) And have Mack Jr 5/14 for 80 yards, do it again with his legs and arms
3) And have the running game be at top notch again...
Thats ALOT to ask and honestly, when I saw this one, I played the side at 9.5 and some ML. That’s just me. I think this win streak ends and it’s over for UCF. Its been a world class run.
All because a SF player chop blocks the QB And ended his season and possibly career. He should be suspended. If you watch the play he threw his body into his legs. Get that fu** off the field. I know guys will see it differently but that’s how I felt.
Even without Milton I would lean UCF if the line is below 6. Memphis is a pretty good team but they've lost 4 games. Earlier this year they appeared to have UCF beat at home, the fans were going nuts and everything but they got outscored 14-0 in the 2nd half to lose 31-30. That was the only close call for UCF as they beat everyone else by double digits. This is a home game for UCF and I think they will take care of business even w/o Milton.
Disagree Super.
It’s a very simple cap for me.
With Milton this team got the biggest scare of their life in two years winning in a squeaker by 1.
Now without Milton against the same team without injuries, they take care of business by 9.5,7,4.5,4 or even 3. The 3 is MAYBE feasible but all the other lines are ludicrous to me. The 9.5 has my jaw hit the floor.
South Florida is now trash. Take virtually nothing from that game. UConn almost beat them.
If the books were impressed by the post-Milton injury performance by UCF with this line setting, they will pay dearly.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Super_Chicken:
Even without Milton I would lean UCF if the line is below 6. Memphis is a pretty good team but they've lost 4 games. Earlier this year they appeared to have UCF beat at home, the fans were going nuts and everything but they got outscored 14-0 in the 2nd half to lose 31-30. That was the only close call for UCF as they beat everyone else by double digits. This is a home game for UCF and I think they will take care of business even w/o Milton.
Disagree Super.
It’s a very simple cap for me.
With Milton this team got the biggest scare of their life in two years winning in a squeaker by 1.
Now without Milton against the same team without injuries, they take care of business by 9.5,7,4.5,4 or even 3. The 3 is MAYBE feasible but all the other lines are ludicrous to me. The 9.5 has my jaw hit the floor.
South Florida is now trash. Take virtually nothing from that game. UConn almost beat them.
If the books were impressed by the post-Milton injury performance by UCF with this line setting, they will pay dearly.
They played earlier this year @ Memphis and line was UCF -4.5. UCF barely won the game and should have lost the game..Memphis was up 17 in the 2nd quarter. Now no Milton and neutral field game...Line is spot on @ -3.5... Opening line of -9.5 was never available...
you could get 9.5 for several hours yesterday , then it started to sink fast , was actually 10 on Saturday night for an hour or so then pulled down
.
0
Quote Originally Posted by davemsh:
They played earlier this year @ Memphis and line was UCF -4.5. UCF barely won the game and should have lost the game..Memphis was up 17 in the 2nd quarter. Now no Milton and neutral field game...Line is spot on @ -3.5... Opening line of -9.5 was never available...
you could get 9.5 for several hours yesterday , then it started to sink fast , was actually 10 on Saturday night for an hour or so then pulled down
They played earlier this year @ Memphis and line was UCF -4.5. UCF barely won the game and should have lost the game..Memphis was up 17 in the 2nd quarter. Now no Milton and neutral field game...Line is spot on @ -3.5... Opening line of -9.5 was never available...
You’re actually going to come on here and allege that I didn’t get a -9.5 line that is currently in my pending wagers inbox
You have balls man....it never ends with you.
0
Quote Originally Posted by davemsh:
They played earlier this year @ Memphis and line was UCF -4.5. UCF barely won the game and should have lost the game..Memphis was up 17 in the 2nd quarter. Now no Milton and neutral field game...Line is spot on @ -3.5... Opening line of -9.5 was never available...
You’re actually going to come on here and allege that I didn’t get a -9.5 line that is currently in my pending wagers inbox
Typo: Northwestern not only didn’t cover but had a lead of 14-7 outside the spread for 2 minutes after a fumble recovery TD. Never were they outside the spread after that and won 34-31 failing to cover.
0
Typo: Northwestern not only didn’t cover but had a lead of 14-7 outside the spread for 2 minutes after a fumble recovery TD. Never were they outside the spread after that and won 34-31 failing to cover.
-9.5 on BetOnline the AM after the game and -7.5 And -7 for two days after. Then to 4.5 yesterday and 3.5/3 today.
typo above:
Northwestern -9.5 over NEB open
Northwestern -3.5 over NEB at kickoff.
I would have jumped that 9.5 no doubt...
What are you seeing on Stanford/Cal? scoresandodds is showing Cal -24, and not only did they not correct it, but they threw a ML on it at -2300/+1225. If you hit Vegas Odds, it shows 5 other books at the 24 or 24.5, and one at the correct 2.5
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
-9.5 on BetOnline the AM after the game and -7.5 And -7 for two days after. Then to 4.5 yesterday and 3.5/3 today.
typo above:
Northwestern -9.5 over NEB open
Northwestern -3.5 over NEB at kickoff.
I would have jumped that 9.5 no doubt...
What are you seeing on Stanford/Cal? scoresandodds is showing Cal -24, and not only did they not correct it, but they threw a ML on it at -2300/+1225. If you hit Vegas Odds, it shows 5 other books at the 24 or 24.5, and one at the correct 2.5
-2.5 Stanford on BO and 5Dimes now. If it was 25 it will be cancelled (obviously!). But that is weird to put an ML to that figure. No one could seriously think that could ever be the line. I wouldn’t even tie up my money.
0
-2.5 Stanford on BO and 5Dimes now. If it was 25 it will be cancelled (obviously!). But that is weird to put an ML to that figure. No one could seriously think that could ever be the line. I wouldn’t even tie up my money.
They played earlier this year @ Memphis and line was UCF -4.5. UCF barely won the game and should have lost the game..Memphis was up 17 in the 2nd quarter. Now no Milton and neutral field game...Line is spot on @ -3.5... Opening line of -9.5 was never available...
You’re actually going to come on here and allege that I didn’t get a -9.5 line that is currently in my pending wagers inboxYou have balls man....it never ends with you.
Scal, are you going to take -3 too?
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Quote Originally Posted by davemsh:
They played earlier this year @ Memphis and line was UCF -4.5. UCF barely won the game and should have lost the game..Memphis was up 17 in the 2nd quarter. Now no Milton and neutral field game...Line is spot on @ -3.5... Opening line of -9.5 was never available...
You’re actually going to come on here and allege that I didn’t get a -9.5 line that is currently in my pending wagers inboxYou have balls man....it never ends with you.
If you watched the last memphis UCF Game with Milton in, it will tell you a lot about this next game. (Heupel better have a BRILLIANT run/pass game plan for this backup. He was gang tackled several times. Light years from Cardel Jones if anyone is hoping for that.)
0
I took Memphis ML action Swan.
If you watched the last memphis UCF Game with Milton in, it will tell you a lot about this next game. (Heupel better have a BRILLIANT run/pass game plan for this backup. He was gang tackled several times. Light years from Cardel Jones if anyone is hoping for that.)
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
