SatNightFever05,
The big reason's or more to the fact the SEC has won (5) National Championships in a row. That will change and another conference will win someday. Then you can be happy because all the bullshit you talk about the SEC will have come true for a year....
But until then your shitting into the wind, dogging the better conference all the time.
SatNightFever05,
The big reason's or more to the fact the SEC has won (5) National Championships in a row. That will change and another conference will win someday. Then you can be happy because all the bullshit you talk about the SEC will have come true for a year.... But until then your shitting into the wind, dogging the better conference all the time.
No your missing the point, i said nothing about Utah and could give a rats ass about that game even if Alabama won 50-0 i would not bring it up. What i wrote has nothing to do with Alabama i bought up the subject you talk shit about the SEC dogging people on things they say like you own this forum.
People here or not here to fight with you..but you do your best to rub what ever they say in the face, like you know everything and other people don't know nothing.
But i will talk about the Utah game if that's what you want.
Utah's was Alabama bitches i doubt that,
Utah beat Alabama WOW give them a cookie.
Utah won on the 1st qt 21-0 > Utah lost the 2nd qt 0-10 Utah tied the 3rd qt 7-7 and Utah got a field goal the 4th qt 3-0.
That's hardly making Alabama Utah's bitches, because Alabama fell behind the 1st gt.
You'll a computer bully plain and simple, and 10-1 says somebody from the south shit down your neck a time or two!
We get it you hate the SEC but enough is enough you have no right to down grade every person that is a fan of the SEC, and if you would lay-off the hate.
Just maybe the hundreds of people who come here would comment more. So this sports forum could be more user friendly.
Thats a bad arguement. 10 minutes is alomost a full quarter. The game is still very much anyones at that point.
People here or not here to fight with you..but you do your best to rub what ever they say in the face, like you know everything and other people don't know nothing.
Utah won on the 1st qt 21-0 > Utah lost the 2nd qt 0-10 Utah tied the 3rd qt 7-7 and Utah got a field goal the 4th qt 3-0.
That's hardly making Alabama Utah's bitches, because Alabama fell behind the 1st gt.
You'll a computer bully plain and simple, and 10-1 says somebody from the south shit down your neck a time or two!
We get it you hate the SEC but enough is enough you have no right to down grade every person that is a fan of the SEC, and if you would lay-off the hate
Yes, a loss is a loss, but anyone who even slightly understands football knows Alabama didn’t want to be there and that was the biggest game in the history of Utah.
Thats a bad arguement. 10 minutes is alomost a full quarter. The game is still very much anyones at that point.
In a championship game a team is winning with less than 10 minutes in the game and they give up 14 unanswered points and end up losing. To me, that is choking.
There is no shame in Bama losing that game.
However, IMO, they did choke considering they had the lead with less than 10 minutes to go and gave up 14 unanswered points.
Yes, a loss is a loss, but anyone who even slightly understands football knows Alabama didn’t want to be there and that was the biggest game in the history of Utah.
Yes, a loss is a loss, but anyone who even slightly understands football knows Alabama didn’t want to be there and that was the biggest game in the history of Utah.
You are right.. no way on Earth a SEC team could lose a BCS bowl game in New Orleans to a better team..
you cannot make that comparrison, because Auburn and Oregon were in the title game, therefore their would be no reason to say that if Auburn lost, they done so because they didn't want to be there
If Auburn had lost in the SEC Championship, it is a possibility that they would lose to whomever they had in the upcoming bowl game, just from the emotional let down of their magical season coming up short. Listen, I am not saying that will always happen, depending how well Chizik and his coaching staff would have handled the situation whether he could have gotten his kids ready to play. One thing for sure, Saban didn't.
To anyone else, who doesn't follow a certain team, go to their practices, read every article written, watch the interviews, talk to friends and the moms and dads of these players, listen to the weekly coaches press conference.... you wouldn't know how the team responds, but the people who do, can tell you , and it is as plain as the nose on your face that Bama came out of the lockerroom already beaten.
No excuse, coaching the players, getting them ready mentally is also part of the game, to which Alabama failed miserably.
There also was disappointment among the team with Alabama having to suspend Andre Smith who allowed (1) sack in (334) plays.
I know one player don't make a team, i had a bad feeling that game when Saban suspended Smith. That right there shows people Saban don't cut no slack....Sugar Bowl or not.
But you can bet, this was great news for Utah as they took advantage of the left side of the Alabama OL with his absence.
2006 SEC All-Freshmen First Team
| SEC All-Freshman First Team[18]
|
ESPN All-American[26]
|
2007 Playboy All-American
2008 Outland Trophy
2008 AP All-SEC First Team
2008 AP All-American
2008 AFCA All-American
2008 CBS All-American
2008 ESPN All American
2008 FWAA All-American
2008 Pro Fottball Weekly All-American
2008 Rivals.com All-American
2008 Sports News All-American
2008 Sports IIIusatrated All-American
2008 Walter Camp All-American
Are you denying that Alabama didn’t want to be there and that was the biggest game in the history of Utah football?
You are right.. no way on Earth a SEC team could lose a BCS bowl game in New Orleans to a better team.. Nice straw man.
And what part of this are you having trouble understanding? Alabama wanted no part of that sugar bowl. They were one quarter away from playing in the national championship, they blew it, and their consolation prize was a bowl game against a non-BCS opponent.
Auburn, on the other hand, was playing in the national championship game.
I realize you aren’t the sharpest knife in the drawer, but surely even you can see the difference.
Nice straw man.
And what part of this are you having trouble understanding? Alabama wanted no part of that sugar bowl. They were one quarter away from playing in the national championship, they blew it, and their consolation prize was a bowl game against a non-BCS opponent.
Auburn, on the other hand, was playing in the national championship game.
I realize you aren’t the sharpest knife in the drawer, but surely even you can see the difference.
You posted “Question- if Oregon beat Auburn LY, would you have the same argument? Because clearly last year's Title game was the most important game in Oregon's history..”
I then answered your question by trying to explain to your feeble mind that it wasn’t the same thing because Alabama didn’t want to be in their bowl game and Auburn, obviously, wanted to be in the BCS championship game.
Your response was simply: “I can surely see you are still giving excuses for why Alabama lost that day.”
I seriously hope for your sake this “I am confused and don’t know what you’re talking about” routine is just an act because if it’s not…wow.
Very simple why the SEC dominates and wins the NC.
The defensive front seven are to big, fast and athletic for all the step sisters who come into the NC game for them to handle. The front seven dominates and thus they dominate the game.
I then answered your question by tying to explain to your feeble mind that it wasn’t the same thing because Alabama didn’t want to be in their bowl game and Auburn, obviously, wanted to be in the BCS championship game.
Your response was simply: “I can surely see you are still giving excuses for why Alabama lost that day.”
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
