Come on guys it is clear as day it was a classic let down.
How do you expect a team to rebound by January 2 after such a heartbreaker December 6? I would expect at least needing a month to six weeks. 'Bama had nothing to play for. All the NFL scouts were at Miami getting ready for a Sam Bradford sighting.
This logic has been proven, if you look back at 2007 'Bama also lost a non-conf game to FSU only because of the OT defeat the week before to Georgia in OT. Another heartbreaker. Otherwise a DD win for the Tide.
As soon as we can all accept this we can begin to answer why did Tennessee lose to underdog UCLA in both 2008 & 2009? Afterall there is no way a Pac 10 doormat, with Neuheisel as a coach, could beat a superior SEC team.
0
Come on guys it is clear as day it was a classic let down.
How do you expect a team to rebound by January 2 after such a heartbreaker December 6? I would expect at least needing a month to six weeks. 'Bama had nothing to play for. All the NFL scouts were at Miami getting ready for a Sam Bradford sighting.
This logic has been proven, if you look back at 2007 'Bama also lost a non-conf game to FSU only because of the OT defeat the week before to Georgia in OT. Another heartbreaker. Otherwise a DD win for the Tide.
As soon as we can all accept this we can begin to answer why did Tennessee lose to underdog UCLA in both 2008 & 2009? Afterall there is no way a Pac 10 doormat, with Neuheisel as a coach, could beat a superior SEC team.
You want me to prove that Alabama didn’t want to be in that bowl game and to Utah it was the biggest game in the history of their football program?
So you are admitting that you honestly don’t already know that?
It was a big game for Utah for sure. But it was also a big game for Bama. Was it not? I am saying that your prove it argument that you used above is the same argument that can be said for the notion that Bama did not want to be there and tanked the game.
can not have it both ways.
0
Quote Originally Posted by StraightShooter:
You want me to prove that Alabama didn’t want to be in that bowl game and to Utah it was the biggest game in the history of their football program?
So you are admitting that you honestly don’t already know that?
It was a big game for Utah for sure. But it was also a big game for Bama. Was it not? I am saying that your prove it argument that you used above is the same argument that can be said for the notion that Bama did not want to be there and tanked the game.
It was a big game for Utah for sure. But it was also a big game for Bama. Was it not? I am saying that your prove it argument that you used above is the same argument that can be said for the notion that Bama did not want to be there and tanked the game.
can not have it both ways.
No, it was not. Compared to Utah, this wasn’t a big game for Bama.
It’s not the same thing. I gave my opinion about what would have happened if an event that never occurred would have taken place.
0
Quote Originally Posted by mattbrot:
It was a big game for Utah for sure. But it was also a big game for Bama. Was it not? I am saying that your prove it argument that you used above is the same argument that can be said for the notion that Bama did not want to be there and tanked the game.
can not have it both ways.
No, it was not. Compared to Utah, this wasn’t a big game for Bama.
It’s not the same thing. I gave my opinion about what would have happened if an event that never occurred would have taken place.
So, how about not compared to Utah.. was it still a big game for Alabama?
You would have to ask Alabama fans that. After that loss to Florida all the Bama fans I know acted more excited about their spring game than they did about the sugar bowl.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SatNightFever05:
So, how about not compared to Utah.. was it still a big game for Alabama?
You would have to ask Alabama fans that. After that loss to Florida all the Bama fans I know acted more excited about their spring game than they did about the sugar bowl.
I stated my opinion about what I thought would most likely have happened in a hypothetical situation and satnightfever keeps responding with the intellectual equivalent of “I know you are but what am I.”
0
Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:
This is like talking to a stop sign
I stated my opinion about what I thought would most likely have happened in a hypothetical situation and satnightfever keeps responding with the intellectual equivalent of “I know you are but what am I.”
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
