well, not really but you have to admit, it's kinda of funny for someone to drop "large" amount of cash to back one team for a very "simple" reason and the funnier part is that he went into all other thread and persuaded other to follow him because of his "simple" reason. I would consider that as late night entertainment.
Dude, you must really have a serious thinking disorder!
Do I really have to bet each and every fucking game by doing 3 weeks of homework? If I did that then it would not be worth it to even make bets.
Like I said already, I watched to horrible play of Georgia Tech, Boston College, and one other ACC rout...and then told myself today that I would bet against to two ACC teams.
I would understand your obvious concern if I was picking games that way everyday but, that is not the case. In fact, I have been here two years and never really posted much, and now I know why.
You need to get laid, bother and let people make picks based in whatever they want...I told you why I picked Cincy and I lost back the money I won betting against that sad sack of a team, Clemson...big deal.
0
Quote Originally Posted by richardtonsj:
well, not really but you have to admit, it's kinda of funny for someone to drop "large" amount of cash to back one team for a very "simple" reason and the funnier part is that he went into all other thread and persuaded other to follow him because of his "simple" reason. I would consider that as late night entertainment.
Dude, you must really have a serious thinking disorder!
Do I really have to bet each and every fucking game by doing 3 weeks of homework? If I did that then it would not be worth it to even make bets.
Like I said already, I watched to horrible play of Georgia Tech, Boston College, and one other ACC rout...and then told myself today that I would bet against to two ACC teams.
I would understand your obvious concern if I was picking games that way everyday but, that is not the case. In fact, I have been here two years and never really posted much, and now I know why.
You need to get laid, bother and let people make picks based in whatever they want...I told you why I picked Cincy and I lost back the money I won betting against that sad sack of a team, Clemson...big deal.
Exactly...the books trying to even out the money...that is how the books operate, they have no fucking clue who is going to win, they want even money on the games so they win EVERY SINGLE TIME.
That's right...............they don't want to leave themselves too exposed on one side or the other BUT ask yourself this:
"Why" was MAJOR cake immediately being placed on Ole Miss.
0
Quote Originally Posted by sundream:
Exactly...the books trying to even out the money...that is how the books operate, they have no fucking clue who is going to win, they want even money on the games so they win EVERY SINGLE TIME.
That's right...............they don't want to leave themselves too exposed on one side or the other BUT ask yourself this:
"Why" was MAJOR cake immediately being placed on Ole Miss.
for someone who claims to be have been betting on sports for 30 years, you sure do like to call people by other names. This just show how maturity you really are.
Maturity? LOL...practice what you preach you doosh bag.
0
Quote Originally Posted by richardtonsj:
for someone who claims to be have been betting on sports for 30 years, you sure do like to call people by other names. This just show how maturity you really are.
Maturity? LOL...practice what you preach you doosh bag.
there is a parallel to the USC game here... USC opened up at 10.5-11, and people saw this as meaning there was value on Ol Miss... much like i said with the Chargers-Broncos game... when the books inflate an opening line beyond what it looks like it should be (i.e., TT -7, USC -10.5, SD -9), you need to think twice about sucking into the dog... these types of lines are actually much more rare than people tend to think (in other words, Vegas doesn't set very many traps when you get down to it)... but when they do, you should spot them quickly and beware...
USC was bet as low as (-7.5)... SD was bet as low as (-7)... and TT has been bet as low as (-3.5)... but notice with all 3 that the game never crossed the critical lines that would allow favorite bettors to hammer a low line... i don't think you are gonna ever see a (-3) on this game, and it has only glimpsed (-3.5) for a very short time at a very few sportsbooks...
people said the sharp bettors were on Penn St, and Denver... and now they're saying it about Ol Miss...
i think they're wrong... either way, considering where the line opened, Tx Tech at (-3.5) is practically a teaser against the opening line, without the extra juice... good value if you axe me...
Nice to see there are some sane thinkers around here!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ice4Blood:
there is a parallel to the USC game here... USC opened up at 10.5-11, and people saw this as meaning there was value on Ol Miss... much like i said with the Chargers-Broncos game... when the books inflate an opening line beyond what it looks like it should be (i.e., TT -7, USC -10.5, SD -9), you need to think twice about sucking into the dog... these types of lines are actually much more rare than people tend to think (in other words, Vegas doesn't set very many traps when you get down to it)... but when they do, you should spot them quickly and beware...
USC was bet as low as (-7.5)... SD was bet as low as (-7)... and TT has been bet as low as (-3.5)... but notice with all 3 that the game never crossed the critical lines that would allow favorite bettors to hammer a low line... i don't think you are gonna ever see a (-3) on this game, and it has only glimpsed (-3.5) for a very short time at a very few sportsbooks...
people said the sharp bettors were on Penn St, and Denver... and now they're saying it about Ol Miss...
i think they're wrong... either way, considering where the line opened, Tx Tech at (-3.5) is practically a teaser against the opening line, without the extra juice... good value if you axe me...
Nice to see there are some sane thinkers around here!
That's right...............they don't want to leave themselves too exposed on one side or the other BUT ask yourself this:
"Why" was MAJOR cake immediately being placed on Ole Miss.
Ummm because people with cake hit it hard first...and that is why the line for TT dropped, then as "cake" came in on TT, then you started to see the spread go back up...like you said, the books want to even out the money for the most part, and why? Because it is GUARANTEED CASH, and lopsided action for books is BAD NEWS and they try to avoid that.
Traps? LOL...yeah like in running to get loser chasing their losses down the toilet, and have liek 4o percent juice!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Alien-1:
That's right...............they don't want to leave themselves too exposed on one side or the other BUT ask yourself this:
"Why" was MAJOR cake immediately being placed on Ole Miss.
Ummm because people with cake hit it hard first...and that is why the line for TT dropped, then as "cake" came in on TT, then you started to see the spread go back up...like you said, the books want to even out the money for the most part, and why? Because it is GUARANTEED CASH, and lopsided action for books is BAD NEWS and they try to avoid that.
Traps? LOL...yeah like in running to get loser chasing their losses down the toilet, and have liek 4o percent juice!
talks shit about education and goes around mis-spelling words left and right
Talk about smart
Taking Cincy tonight and trying to get other retarded sheep like yourself to follow you stupis ASS
Ummm, I don't actually care about your record, nor does your record make you any more of a man...face it, you don't get laid much, because you are a troll.
As for misspelling? I don't care about that, I was talking about your general use of the English Language, NOT typos...doosh bag.
BTW, say hi to your mother for me, OK?
0
Quote Originally Posted by 2_inchKilla:
a 6th grader on a 27-10 roll
what a weenie
talks shit about education and goes around mis-spelling words left and right
Talk about smart
Taking Cincy tonight and trying to get other retarded sheep like yourself to follow you stupis ASS
Ummm, I don't actually care about your record, nor does your record make you any more of a man...face it, you don't get laid much, because you are a troll.
As for misspelling? I don't care about that, I was talking about your general use of the English Language, NOT typos...doosh bag.
Yep, I lost on Cincy...big deal...I wipe my ass with the money I lost on Cincy...although I did not have to use my toilet paper made out of cash, I just used the money I won on Nebraska because the ACC and Clemson sucks...so I broke even on that reasoning today....I took Iowa this morning, so I did alright for the day.
Now get some rest and quit worrying about one pick based on reasoning you find faulty.
0
Quote Originally Posted by 2_inchKilla:
Well it kinda looks like your the loser tonight
Yep, I lost on Cincy...big deal...I wipe my ass with the money I lost on Cincy...although I did not have to use my toilet paper made out of cash, I just used the money I won on Nebraska because the ACC and Clemson sucks...so I broke even on that reasoning today....I took Iowa this morning, so I did alright for the day.
Now get some rest and quit worrying about one pick based on reasoning you find faulty.
Ummm because people with cake hit it hard first...and that is why the line for TT dropped, then as "cake" came in on TT, then you started to see the spread go back up...like you said, the books want to even out the money for the most part, and why? Because it is GUARANTEED CASH, and lopsided action for books is BAD NEWS and they try to avoid that.
Traps? LOL...yeah like in running to get loser chasing their losses down the toilet, and have liek 4o percent juice!
Taking it one step further, why didn't vegas take the line down to the KEY number of 3 ?? I know why.
Why did they stop at 4??
0
Quote Originally Posted by sundream:
Ummm because people with cake hit it hard first...and that is why the line for TT dropped, then as "cake" came in on TT, then you started to see the spread go back up...like you said, the books want to even out the money for the most part, and why? Because it is GUARANTEED CASH, and lopsided action for books is BAD NEWS and they try to avoid that.
Traps? LOL...yeah like in running to get loser chasing their losses down the toilet, and have liek 4o percent juice!
Taking it one step further, why didn't vegas take the line down to the KEY number of 3 ?? I know why.
so you should probably chill with the tough guy talk
it only makes you look more like a fool when you get so mad that you gotta call people big tough names
truthfully -- it means you're probably just another one of those pussies
First you say that you would MASH me in the real world, and then YOU say "I" should chill with the tough guy talk? LOL...and then you tell me not to call people names when it was YOU who started the name calling?
Seriously dude, I live in Texas...PLEASE come knock on my door so I can fill you with a belly fully of hollow points from my 44 magnum...pretty please?
0
Quote Originally Posted by 2_inchKilla:
i would MASH you in the real world
so you should probably chill with the tough guy talk
it only makes you look more like a fool when you get so mad that you gotta call people big tough names
truthfully -- it means you're probably just another one of those pussies
First you say that you would MASH me in the real world, and then YOU say "I" should chill with the tough guy talk? LOL...and then you tell me not to call people names when it was YOU who started the name calling?
Seriously dude, I live in Texas...PLEASE come knock on my door so I can fill you with a belly fully of hollow points from my 44 magnum...pretty please?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.