I'm not the biggest trend guy. In fact, you'll hardly see them in my write-ups.
But when I see one that I think matters, I can't help but share it.
Plus this has a the tried and true revenge-factor intermingled with it for the psychological capping purposes which I do love.
Here is the trend (with my parentheticals added:
1. Teams that lose 3 games or fewer the previous year (i.e., teams contending for major bowls or the national championship and/or very good teams the previous year) that,
2. Beat their current Week 1 opponent (in this case it's Notre Dame who beat Texas last year), by more than 21 points (Notre Dame crushed Texas last year 38-3 in week 1),
are a whopping
6-33-1 ATS
when they play that team the following year in their opening game.
So what this says is, a dog, coming in with revenge from the previous year, gets to play the team that blew it out the previous year right out of the gate to start the year.
That team has covered 33 out of 39 times.
Yes, 95% of trends are a stretch and some of you will retort with "If a butterfly flaps its wings in China, Notre Dame will win" but I like this trend.
Just decided to share it.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I'm not the biggest trend guy. In fact, you'll hardly see them in my write-ups.
But when I see one that I think matters, I can't help but share it.
Plus this has a the tried and true revenge-factor intermingled with it for the psychological capping purposes which I do love.
Here is the trend (with my parentheticals added:
1. Teams that lose 3 games or fewer the previous year (i.e., teams contending for major bowls or the national championship and/or very good teams the previous year) that,
2. Beat their current Week 1 opponent (in this case it's Notre Dame who beat Texas last year), by more than 21 points (Notre Dame crushed Texas last year 38-3 in week 1),
are a whopping
6-33-1 ATS
when they play that team the following year in their opening game.
So what this says is, a dog, coming in with revenge from the previous year, gets to play the team that blew it out the previous year right out of the gate to start the year.
That team has covered 33 out of 39 times.
Yes, 95% of trends are a stretch and some of you will retort with "If a butterfly flaps its wings in China, Notre Dame will win" but I like this trend.
You playing Texas or still deciding? I tend to try and have a short memory with gambling but I still can't get how horrific Texas's offense was last year out of my head. Anyone got a good scouting report on this new QB?
0
You playing Texas or still deciding? I tend to try and have a short memory with gambling but I still can't get how horrific Texas's offense was last year out of my head. Anyone got a good scouting report on this new QB?
Here’s an incredible stat for you: Notre Dame has not won a road game
as an underdog or touchdown-or-less favorite since 2012. They’re 0-8 in
those games straight-up. This game falls within that trend, and it’s
another reason to doubt Notre Dame’s ability to turn it on against the
live ‘dogs in Austin.
0
Here’s an incredible stat for you: Notre Dame has not won a road game
as an underdog or touchdown-or-less favorite since 2012. They’re 0-8 in
those games straight-up. This game falls within that trend, and it’s
another reason to doubt Notre Dame’s ability to turn it on against the
live ‘dogs in Austin.
Die hard Texas fan here. Looked at this game very closely. Texas has been abysmal the past few years but I believe that just adds motivation and a revenge factor. I think they come out ready to play and hungry for a win to start off their season. Going with the horns on this one. Will wait till before the game as a lot of the money will come in on ND
0
Die hard Texas fan here. Looked at this game very closely. Texas has been abysmal the past few years but I believe that just adds motivation and a revenge factor. I think they come out ready to play and hungry for a win to start off their season. Going with the horns on this one. Will wait till before the game as a lot of the money will come in on ND
Die hard Texas fan here. That elbein said, it has been very difficult to watch this abysmal team the past two years. However, I think they are improved this year. Charlie strong' job is on the line and the revenge factor of getting blown out last year by this talented ND team will come into play. I like Texas plus he points and the under for the first half. Should be a good one
0
Die hard Texas fan here. That elbein said, it has been very difficult to watch this abysmal team the past two years. However, I think they are improved this year. Charlie strong' job is on the line and the revenge factor of getting blown out last year by this talented ND team will come into play. I like Texas plus he points and the under for the first half. Should be a good one
Here’s an incredible stat for you: Notre Dame has not won a road game as an underdog or touchdown-or-less favorite since 2012. They’re 0-8 in those games straight-up. This game falls within that trend, and it’s another reason to doubt Notre Dame’s ability to turn it on against the live ‘dogs in Austin.
Nice find.
Rocky, it's definitely NOT in the line. That is why people look for trends. They are trying to find result patterns outside of the line.
Vegas does not have this trend and even if it did, it wouldn't adjust the line for it even .5 pt.
0
Quote Originally Posted by tmurda666:
Here’s an incredible stat for you: Notre Dame has not won a road game as an underdog or touchdown-or-less favorite since 2012. They’re 0-8 in those games straight-up. This game falls within that trend, and it’s another reason to doubt Notre Dame’s ability to turn it on against the live ‘dogs in Austin.
Nice find.
Rocky, it's definitely NOT in the line. That is why people look for trends. They are trying to find result patterns outside of the line.
Vegas does not have this trend and even if it did, it wouldn't adjust the line for it even .5 pt.
Notre Dame with 7 players gone via the NFL Draft and game is in Texas.
I'm on the horns.
Win or lose I can live with my bet with all this going for it.
Exactly the reason why I did not put any money down on Notre Dame and took the UNDER instead. Will watch this game though to see how both teams play tonight.
0
Quote Originally Posted by timmyclax22:
Notre Dame with 7 players gone via the NFL Draft and game is in Texas.
I'm on the horns.
Win or lose I can live with my bet with all this going for it.
Exactly the reason why I did not put any money down on Notre Dame and took the UNDER instead. Will watch this game though to see how both teams play tonight.
Here’s an incredible stat for you: Notre Dame has not won a road game
as an underdog or touchdown-or-less favorite since 2012. They’re 0-8 in
those games straight-up. This game falls within that trend, and it’s
another reason to doubt Notre Dame’s ability to turn it on against the
live ‘dogs in Austin.
Here’s an incredible stat for you: Notre Dame has not won a road game
as an underdog or touchdown-or-less favorite since 2012. They’re 0-8 in
those games straight-up. This game falls within that trend, and it’s
another reason to doubt Notre Dame’s ability to turn it on against the
live ‘dogs in Austin.
I'm not the biggest trend guy. In fact, you'll hardly see them in my write-ups.
But when I see one that I think matters, I can't help but share it.
Plus this has a the tried and true revenge-factor intermingled with it for the psychological capping purposes which I do love.
Here is the trend (with my parentheticals added:
1. Teams that lose 3 games or fewer the previous year (i.e., teams contending for major bowls or the national championship and/or very good teams the previous year) that,
2. Beat their current Week 1 opponent (in this case it's Notre Dame who beat Texas last year), by more than 21 points (Notre Dame crushed Texas last year 38-3 in week 1),
are a whopping
6-33-1 ATS
when they play that team the following year in their opening game.
So what this says is, a dog, coming in with revenge from the previous year, gets to play the team that blew it out the previous year right out of the gate to start the year.
That team has covered 33 out of 39 times.
Yes, 95% of trends are a stretch and some of you will retort with "If a butterfly flaps its wings in China, Notre Dame will win" but I like this trend.
Just decided to share it
This was a quality find Scalabrine. Trend is now 34 for 40. Well done
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
I'm not the biggest trend guy. In fact, you'll hardly see them in my write-ups.
But when I see one that I think matters, I can't help but share it.
Plus this has a the tried and true revenge-factor intermingled with it for the psychological capping purposes which I do love.
Here is the trend (with my parentheticals added:
1. Teams that lose 3 games or fewer the previous year (i.e., teams contending for major bowls or the national championship and/or very good teams the previous year) that,
2. Beat their current Week 1 opponent (in this case it's Notre Dame who beat Texas last year), by more than 21 points (Notre Dame crushed Texas last year 38-3 in week 1),
are a whopping
6-33-1 ATS
when they play that team the following year in their opening game.
So what this says is, a dog, coming in with revenge from the previous year, gets to play the team that blew it out the previous year right out of the gate to start the year.
That team has covered 33 out of 39 times.
Yes, 95% of trends are a stretch and some of you will retort with "If a butterfly flaps its wings in China, Notre Dame will win" but I like this trend.
Just decided to share it
This was a quality find Scalabrine. Trend is now 34 for 40. Well done
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.