This committe is completely lost

Look, spin all you want, I don't need for anyone to see the error in your logic and the amount of spinning and backtracking you do..majority of the board knows already...We've all accepted that you welched...so what?  it's only your rep that you tarnished....

Just don't be surprised and offended and call people trolls just because guys are debating with you.  What do you expect?  you make some of the silliest arguments out of anyone on this board and you constantly backtrack and contradict yourself...and then you cry foul LOL...

No one likes the guy who throws rocks and runs. 

Disagreeing with you and pointing out the errors in your "facts" is trolling?  ok. 

And the distance on that FG that he missed was in the high 20's...not 20 something..... (<---see what I did there?  that's SPINNING.  Unfortunately, I have to point it out because I have no faith in you realizing what I was trying to do).

I think you should take a LONG HARD look in the mirror.  I pointed out the MAJOR fact that TCU lost by 3 (HF advantage spread) in WACO.  Something YOU YOURSELF pound home.  Road games.  That's trolling?  Keep digging yourself deeper...again, it's only your own image, that image you care about so much, that you are tarnishing (even moreso).

Know what boom, I had logged off and then all of a sudden this post and your response to the point I made and your understanding of what i wrote...it hit me...the  went off...

my understanding of you and who you are....it's hard to really understand someone on a message board...you need to have that in person or at least verbal contact to really gauge someone...

without that, I had a completely inaccurate view of you...now it's clear...and my newfound understanding of you has completely erased any joy I may have had in our back and forths...you will get no such more from me, that I can promise....

GL to you.

Fellas.......

Here is the deal, pure and simple.

Mississippi State is ranked #1 and Bama is ranked #5.  Oregon is 2, FSU is 3 and TCU is 4.

These rankings are designed to assure that there is a team from the SEC in, and more than likely 2 teams in.  Bama beats MSU, then Bama is #1 or 2#.  MSU wins out after the loss, they are most likely #4.  MSU has the best track to make it in....even better than Bama's.....it could be advantageous to miss the SEC title game, and get an at large bid out of the SEC west.

Oregon wins out, then they are in, despite the big loss at home to Arizona. Oregon has looked human this season, @ WSU, @Utah, and of course Zona woodshedded them.  Stanford and MSU are the quality wins......both at home, and both opponents are showing how mediocre they are. UCLA isn't top flight either.

So, bottom line is this:  ESPN and the SEC are joined at the hip.  Nike has huge sway when it comes to Oregon getting national respect every year despite the slip ups. 

The Big 10 is screwed in this system, more than likely because of the Big 10 network butting heads with ESPN at every turn. Ohio State is a damn good football team, better than Oregon, and will not get a look.

This whole thing is garbage.

Bottom line is FSU deserves to still be ranked #1 until someone beats them but I don't believe they are the best team in the nation. I also don't believe Miss St is. Bama will take care of MSU this weekend and the rest will play itself out. Being ranked 1 or 4 really won't matter much when the playoff starts, the argument will be coming from the 5th and 6th teams.

Nothing against you bro, so don't take this the wrong way...but do you have any reading comprehension?  Let me break it down for you...

Boom used a double standard to strengthen his argument both ways...on one hand, he tried to pump up FSU's SOS resume by noting only "current" top 25 teams in comparison to TCU's wins.

Then, when trying to discount Oregon's SOS, he disregards that Arizona is CURRENTLY in the top 25 and instead notes that when Oregon lost to AZ, AZ was UNRANKED and a 24 point dog. 

I asked Boom to clarify which is it, current rankings or is it gametime rankings that should matter as obviously, AZ shouldn't have been a 24 point dog to the ducks.  He responded by defining the meaning of current, which was not the question.

Therefore, it's obvious that his reading comprehension, along with yours it seems, inabsence of a better word, is lacking...hence, my LAST response that will be directed towards him.  I now understand where he is "at" and feel no further need to discuss any topic with him.  I fully understand why he posts the things he posts.    I'll no longer clutter the circle jerk that is boom's threads.