nostra - Losing Anthony Dixon is a big loss for the Bulldogs. but they have 5 or 6 backs that will see the field this year... very deep at RB... plus the addition of Vick Ballard (JC) will help the young RB's... Relf has improved drastically at QB and will get the majority of the playing time at first until Russell gets his rhythm together
Dixon was a beast for sure, Ballard looks like he has some speed. Probably Miss St will be around 16-20 with Memphis low power ranking after last year 2-9 ATS. Will be interesting with new coach and to see who wins QB battle for Tigers - Bass, Smith (Miami transfer, son of FedEx founder), or maybe true frosh Williams who looked good in spring.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Corley1011:
nostra - Losing Anthony Dixon is a big loss for the Bulldogs. but they have 5 or 6 backs that will see the field this year... very deep at RB... plus the addition of Vick Ballard (JC) will help the young RB's... Relf has improved drastically at QB and will get the majority of the playing time at first until Russell gets his rhythm together
Dixon was a beast for sure, Ballard looks like he has some speed. Probably Miss St will be around 16-20 with Memphis low power ranking after last year 2-9 ATS. Will be interesting with new coach and to see who wins QB battle for Tigers - Bass, Smith (Miami transfer, son of FedEx founder), or maybe true frosh Williams who looked good in spring.
I like Navy and Washington State just looking over the games quickly. I think Washington State may be a nice moneymaker getting a lot of points this year.
0
I like Navy and Washington State just looking over the games quickly. I think Washington State may be a nice moneymaker getting a lot of points this year.
I think Washington State may be a nice moneymaker getting a lot of
points this year.
and.......you might be homeless before the season ends....lol.......and....I might be right there with you too
* true.....a lotta injuries...BUT.....wow they were unbelievably bad.....check out these #'s
Offense #119 at 4.1/play...only NMexSt worse #120 at 113 TFL allowed .......WOW # 119 at 53 sacks allowed.....(but only 372 attempts.....#120 Mia,O had 534 attempts) #120 in TOP....not helping defense AT ALL... # 118 in rush O.....2.5/rush #108 in pass O.......5.7/att (PR #114) # 120 in 3rd down conversions...23.8%..5 points below Army........holy shit ! #102 in Turnovers.....for good measure....75th or so in penalties.....< hey not too bad..............
Defense #120 at 7.1/play ! #117 rush D at 5.9/rush #114 pass D (yds/att)....PR #112 #106 in TFL......#115 in sacks
might check stats after Okie St pounds the dogshit out of em for signs of life....(T-Boone will have Gundy killed if they don't destroy Wazzu)......then (maybe) feel good home win over Montana st....do catch SMU in nice lookahead spot....(TCU next)......ponies off tough game with TTech ....and probably nice home win over UAB.....but.... then USC.....@ UCLA....ducks.....zona.....@ stan...@ ariz st.....cal.....@ oreg st......wash
* i think Mrs Wulff can go ahead and start packing
The impediment to action advances action - what stands in the way becomes the way.
0
I think Washington State may be a nice moneymaker getting a lot of
points this year.
and.......you might be homeless before the season ends....lol.......and....I might be right there with you too
* true.....a lotta injuries...BUT.....wow they were unbelievably bad.....check out these #'s
Offense #119 at 4.1/play...only NMexSt worse #120 at 113 TFL allowed .......WOW # 119 at 53 sacks allowed.....(but only 372 attempts.....#120 Mia,O had 534 attempts) #120 in TOP....not helping defense AT ALL... # 118 in rush O.....2.5/rush #108 in pass O.......5.7/att (PR #114) # 120 in 3rd down conversions...23.8%..5 points below Army........holy shit ! #102 in Turnovers.....for good measure....75th or so in penalties.....< hey not too bad..............
Defense #120 at 7.1/play ! #117 rush D at 5.9/rush #114 pass D (yds/att)....PR #112 #106 in TFL......#115 in sacks
might check stats after Okie St pounds the dogshit out of em for signs of life....(T-Boone will have Gundy killed if they don't destroy Wazzu)......then (maybe) feel good home win over Montana st....do catch SMU in nice lookahead spot....(TCU next)......ponies off tough game with TTech ....and probably nice home win over UAB.....but.... then USC.....@ UCLA....ducks.....zona.....@ stan...@ ariz st.....cal.....@ oreg st......wash
* i think Mrs Wulff can go ahead and start packing
I like Navy and Washington State just looking over the games quickly. I think Washington State may be a nice moneymaker getting a lot of points this year.
Love the Avatar........
Wonder how Many current NFL WR's would Lose sleep /and Stats if Jack Tatum was in the League
Washington St. better be Getting the Farm +++ATS
BEST OF HEALTH, HAPPINESS,WEALTH, BLESSINGS and LUCK TO ALL !!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Dr_Death:
I like Navy and Washington State just looking over the games quickly. I think Washington State may be a nice moneymaker getting a lot of points this year.
Love the Avatar........
Wonder how Many current NFL WR's would Lose sleep /and Stats if Jack Tatum was in the League
keeping an eye on JC transfer DL Rankin for Wash St, 26 sacks and had some interest from USC, Oreg St and LSU and received scholarship offer from Alabama and went with WSU
0
keeping an eye on JC transfer DL Rankin for Wash St, 26 sacks and had some interest from USC, Oreg St and LSU and received scholarship offer from Alabama and went with WSU
keeping an eye on JC transfer DL Rankin for Wash St, 26 sacks and had some interest from USC, Oreg St and LSU and received scholarship offer from Alabama and went with WSU
not accusing anybody of anything.....BUT....what odds would you give me the dude drives a NICE car ?????
The impediment to action advances action - what stands in the way becomes the way.
0
Quote Originally Posted by nostradamus12:
keeping an eye on JC transfer DL Rankin for Wash St, 26 sacks and had some interest from USC, Oreg St and LSU and received scholarship offer from Alabama and went with WSU
not accusing anybody of anything.....BUT....what odds would you give me the dude drives a NICE car ?????
not accusing anybody of anything.....BUT....what odds would you give me the dude drives a NICE car ?????
Doubt it. No way Wash St can compete with the big boys in providing money under the table. Wash St probably gauranteed him a starting job, which those other schools couldn't do. Either that, or he really loves farmland.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bookieassassin:
not accusing anybody of anything.....BUT....what odds would you give me the dude drives a NICE car ?????
Doubt it. No way Wash St can compete with the big boys in providing money under the table. Wash St probably gauranteed him a starting job, which those other schools couldn't do. Either that, or he really loves farmland.
major red flag to me when a guy turns down Bama, LSU or USC.
dudes not confident in his own self. it would be one thing to turn those schools down for a Cal/UW/ASU, for example, but Wazzu? Very questionable.
I disagree. Wash St is still in the Pac 10 and he gets to start right away. If he goes to Bama, chances are good he never sees the field. Wash St was there for this kid when no other school would touch him because of his academics. Can't knock him for loyalty.
0
Quote Originally Posted by westcoastTrojan:
major red flag to me when a guy turns down Bama, LSU or USC.
dudes not confident in his own self. it would be one thing to turn those schools down for a Cal/UW/ASU, for example, but Wazzu? Very questionable.
I disagree. Wash St is still in the Pac 10 and he gets to start right away. If he goes to Bama, chances are good he never sees the field. Wash St was there for this kid when no other school would touch him because of his academics. Can't knock him for loyalty.
I think Washington State may be a nice moneymaker getting a lot of points this year.
and.......you might be homeless before the season ends....lol.......and....I might be right there with you too
* true.....a lotta injuries...BUT.....wow they were unbelievably bad.....check out these #'s
Offense #119 at 4.1/play...only NMexSt worse #120 at 113 TFL allowed .......WOW # 119 at 53 sacks allowed.....(but only 372 attempts.....#120 Mia,O had 534 attempts) #120 in TOP....not helping defense AT ALL... # 118 in rush O.....2.5/rush #108 in pass O.......5.7/att (PR #114) # 120 in 3rd down conversions...23.8%..5 points below Army........holy shit ! #102 in Turnovers.....for good measure....75th or so in penalties.....< hey not too bad..............
Defense #120 at 7.1/play ! #117 rush D at 5.9/rush #114 pass D (yds/att)....PR #112 #106 in TFL......#115 in sacks
might check stats after Okie St pounds the dogshit out of em for signs of life....(T-Boone will have Gundy killed if they don't destroy Wazzu)......then (maybe) feel good home win over Montana st....do catch SMU in nice lookahead spot....(TCU next)......ponies off tough game with TTech ....and probably nice home win over UAB.....but.... then USC.....@ UCLA....ducks.....zona.....@ stan...@ ariz st.....cal.....@ oreg st......wash
* i think Mrs Wulff can go ahead and start packing
I know they suck and agree Wuff is done after this year. I was just saying they may improve to the point where they are losing by 21-24 points per game instead of 40. You are probably right though. Let's see if they can hang with OSU for a quarter and then we may have something. Lose the first game by 50 and a mentally weak team may get even weaker. Thanks for the input.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bookieassassin:
I think Washington State may be a nice moneymaker getting a lot of points this year.
and.......you might be homeless before the season ends....lol.......and....I might be right there with you too
* true.....a lotta injuries...BUT.....wow they were unbelievably bad.....check out these #'s
Offense #119 at 4.1/play...only NMexSt worse #120 at 113 TFL allowed .......WOW # 119 at 53 sacks allowed.....(but only 372 attempts.....#120 Mia,O had 534 attempts) #120 in TOP....not helping defense AT ALL... # 118 in rush O.....2.5/rush #108 in pass O.......5.7/att (PR #114) # 120 in 3rd down conversions...23.8%..5 points below Army........holy shit ! #102 in Turnovers.....for good measure....75th or so in penalties.....< hey not too bad..............
Defense #120 at 7.1/play ! #117 rush D at 5.9/rush #114 pass D (yds/att)....PR #112 #106 in TFL......#115 in sacks
might check stats after Okie St pounds the dogshit out of em for signs of life....(T-Boone will have Gundy killed if they don't destroy Wazzu)......then (maybe) feel good home win over Montana st....do catch SMU in nice lookahead spot....(TCU next)......ponies off tough game with TTech ....and probably nice home win over UAB.....but.... then USC.....@ UCLA....ducks.....zona.....@ stan...@ ariz st.....cal.....@ oreg st......wash
* i think Mrs Wulff can go ahead and start packing
I know they suck and agree Wuff is done after this year. I was just saying they may improve to the point where they are losing by 21-24 points per game instead of 40. You are probably right though. Let's see if they can hang with OSU for a quarter and then we may have something. Lose the first game by 50 and a mentally weak team may get even weaker. Thanks for the input.
I see the MSU/Memphis game being around 38-14 in favor of MSU... from what I saw out of Memphis last year...
What does everyone think about the LSU/UNC game?
I like your boys this season. They played tough last year and this is Season 2 under Mullen. I think they are a team on the rise, while LSU is going the other way.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Corley1011:
I see the MSU/Memphis game being around 38-14 in favor of MSU... from what I saw out of Memphis last year...
What does everyone think about the LSU/UNC game?
I like your boys this season. They played tough last year and this is Season 2 under Mullen. I think they are a team on the rise, while LSU is going the other way.
Doubt it. No way Wash St can compete with the big boys in providing money under the table. Wash St probably gauranteed him a starting job, which those other schools couldn't do. Either that, or he really loves farmland.
agree... I would rather start ....than sit my ass on the Bench for 2 Years
BEST OF HEALTH, HAPPINESS,WEALTH, BLESSINGS and LUCK TO ALL !!
0
Quote Originally Posted by thorpe:
Doubt it. No way Wash St can compete with the big boys in providing money under the table. Wash St probably gauranteed him a starting job, which those other schools couldn't do. Either that, or he really loves farmland.
agree... I would rather start ....than sit my ass on the Bench for 2 Years
How good could LSU be if they had a coach who could manage a game and prepare better...Great to see you again Kaplan...Doubleup and Nosterdomus give great info..Love the early football talk...My Reds are keeping me interested in baseball still!!
0
How good could LSU be if they had a coach who could manage a game and prepare better...Great to see you again Kaplan...Doubleup and Nosterdomus give great info..Love the early football talk...My Reds are keeping me interested in baseball still!!
Bowling Green might be auto-fade for the first four or five weeks- similar to Ball St last year- lost 9 year starter Sheehan and do everything WR Barnes.. major rebuilding going on there, esp. with a D that gave up 40+ to Idaho
Schedule sets up nicely for the fade too.. @ Troy, @ Tulsa, Marshall, @ UM.. should start 0-4..
0
Troy 12.5 Bowling Green
Bowling Green might be auto-fade for the first four or five weeks- similar to Ball St last year- lost 9 year starter Sheehan and do everything WR Barnes.. major rebuilding going on there, esp. with a D that gave up 40+ to Idaho
Schedule sets up nicely for the fade too.. @ Troy, @ Tulsa, Marshall, @ UM.. should start 0-4..
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.