All Forums | College Football

*** Week 1 NCAA Football ***

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 22690
Posts: 225
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #51
Quote Originally Posted by nostradamus12:

was wondering where you were on Clemson, was expecting 28-30 and had written it off then saw the opener and almost pulled the trigger immediately except caught up on other games, gonna have to take another look....UNT not likely to do much damage, need to check out the Tiger offense again
Clemson has a ton of experience on the OL and Depth. The entire Defense is one of the best in the country... They have good play at QB,RB, and TE...

Worries -  WR   Someone needs to step up and I believe Dye and Ashe will...  Dont sleep on the tigers. They will contend again in the ACC.

 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 38
Posted: #52
UConn does not match up well against Michigan, though they will likely have a better W/L record at years end.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 88
Posted: #53
I Like the under a lot in the cu game, don't expect the mean green to score more than 10pts. Expect cu to score no more than 42. At 58 I like it a lot, how do you feel about it?
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 30979
Posted: #54
Clemson
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2010
Posts: 610
Posted: #55
I like Missouri in this spot also and I do think that they will cover easily vs Illinois. The tigers are 13-5 ATS in the last 18 non-conference games. Missouri has covered in all 5 meetings with Illinois.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2010
Posts: 610
Posted: #56
I am going to have to go with Michigan in a close game vs UCONN.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #57
Quote Originally Posted by Dwood:

UConn does not match up well against Michigan, though they will likely have a better W/L record at years end.
I Like UCONN a lot too.... and I m with you on the matchup. Michigan really needs this game more than UCONN.

Although I really believe UCONN is the better team, I think I will sit this game out...
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #58
Quote Originally Posted by dozier4:

I Like the under a lot in the cu game, don't expect the mean green to score more than 10pts. Expect cu to score no more than 42. At 58 I like it a lot, how do you feel about it?
It's 57 right now on the greek. Yeah, I dont think N.Texas can score more than 7 points and Dabo will rest his starters when he gets a comfortable lead. We have a tough schedule this year... He cant afford losing any players. Especially to teams like N.Texas and Presbyterian.

 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #59
Quote Originally Posted by Ace77:

Clemson
Damn You Ace....



 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #60
Quote Originally Posted by Gunner10:

I like Missouri in this spot also and I do think that they will cover easily vs Illinois. The tigers are 13-5 ATS in the last 18 non-conference games. Missouri has covered in all 5 meetings with Illinois.
Well, the line is moving up...  I Like MIZZ too, I m just a little gun shy about this game for some reason.


 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 30979
Posted: #61
Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:

Damn You Ace....







GL this season champ
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #62
Quote Originally Posted by Ace77:





GL this season champ
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 438
Posted: #63

Good luck this year Boom.

Stay sober for this year's S.C./Clemson match-up. We don't need another complete meltdown like lastyear.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 88
Posted: #64
Thanks boom boom, I Still like under might go ahead and lock it in
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #65
Quote Originally Posted by dozier4:

Thanks boom boom, I Still like under might go ahead and lock it in
That Number has went down....
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2010
Posts: 610
Posted: #66
I tend to like Louisville in this spot. Last week I saw a line Kentucky -7. That was a trap line. I am sure that this line will go down as the game gets near.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2004
Posts: 3733
Posted: #67
GL this year Boom, glad to see you up and running early....
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #68
Quote Originally Posted by Gunner10:

I tend to like Louisville in this spot. Last week I saw a line Kentucky -7. That was a trap line. I am sure that this line will go down as the game gets near.
I think Louisville Beats Kentucky  SU
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #69
Quote Originally Posted by tiasman:

GL this year Boom, glad to see you up and running early....
Good To See you buddy.....
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #70
Lines Current lines i m still looking at....

Iowa S.T / N.Illinois    Under 47    

Minnesota  + 4 

Colorado  -12    

Purdue  + 10.5

UCONN  + 3 

Kansas S.T  + 2

Army  -8.5    

Troy  -13.5

Louisville  +3 

Mizz  -13.5

UNC + 1.5



Games locked in


Oklahoma   - 29     2 Units

Nebraska  - 34.5     2 Units

UNC / LSU      Under 40.5    1 Unit

Clemson     -21.5      1 Unit

Minnesota / Middle Tenn.  S.T    Over 53    1.5  Units
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 1149
Posted: #71
Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:

Lines Current lines i m still looking at....

Iowa S.T / N.Illinois    Under 47    

Minnesota  + 4 

Colorado  -12    

Purdue  + 10.5

UCONN  + 3  

Kansas S.T  + 2  

Army  -8.5    

Troy  -13.5 

Louisville  +3 

Mizz  -13.5

UNC + 1.5 



Games locked in


Oklahoma   - 29     2 Units

Nebraska  - 34.5     2 Units

UNC / LSU      Under 40.5    1 Unit

Clemson     -21.5      1 Unit

Minnesota / Middle Tenn.  S.T    Over 53    1.5  Units


Why Louisville?  line seems pretty small for a UK team that should be decent this year..
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 2774
Posted: #72
...hey boom,  K.st is a better home team than road, they got better during the season LY, and UCLA got lucky LY, as they almost lost that bowl game to Temple...
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #73
Quote Originally Posted by BBallday10:



Why Louisville?  line seems pretty small for a UK team that should be decent this year..
Glad you asked...

Louisville IMO Pulls the upset in week 1. Kentucky has to fill some holes and Louisville will be a little salty this year on Offense IMO... I dont think Louisville has a great year on the terms of Wins and Losses.....But, I do think they pull this one out for Coach Strong and his first game.



 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 17342
Posted: #74
Quote Originally Posted by QBoption:

...hey boom,  K.st is a better home team than road, they got better during the season LY, and UCLA got lucky LY, as they almost lost that bowl game to Temple...
This will be one of the better games of week 1 IMO. Coach Snyder will have his boys ready to play and I think the beat UCLA...
 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 7190
Posted: #75
Hello everyone and welcome back!...I've had the Football itch for months!!..Boom_Boom great to start reading ur posts!!..Love NEB as well, But my game i got my eyes on Is boise St/ VA Tech.Boise has been waiting for this big game..Lay the 2 1/2.... Lets Have another great season players
Bet with your wallet,not your heart
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.