week 7

@Last2thirst

 That tune is so good!  You have excelent taste 

I appreciate you !

F and day = Friday and season>2019 and line <= -2 and ou streak > -1 and week < 11 and PRSW<10 and o:PRSW<10 and line>-25 and PPRSW<11

9-30 ATS and both UNLV and MARY qualify as fades. 

Thanks buddy....U2  Not sure if I talked about this one before.....gets me every Friday! Have to play it (Sepultura Mountain Song formerly by Jane's Addiction 1985)

From Brazil ....they are super tight!

Well spottie ,I don't remember doing that to you and I went to your week 6 for last week and don't see anything that I said,  so you would have to show me and you should know that's not my style. I appreciate all you do, your one of the 3 or 4 people I keep track of. simply don't remember asking any questions.

okay I am not going back, I know what happened and we will move on from it.  I expected more from you guys with our long relationship.  Oh well. 

Good luck this  week 

I simply moved on because I think Indigo was having a hard time in life.  Instead of trying to fix his poor communication it was just best I take a break for a while.  We all go through it so I understand.

Here is to better communications and best vibes for all 

No problem I talk to him by phone. Sorry for any miss understanding, your still on the few people I keep track of, we've done a lot of pm's before they got rid of it, take care buddy.

ats streak<-3 and D and season>2009 and o:wins>2 and 11>week>5

winner with Northwestern

week = 7 and F and day != Saturday and line < -7 and ats streak > -2 and site = away

5-21 now as UNLV quit in the 2nd Half and it wouldn’t have been an issue if the line wasn’t so many.  They had it but stuff like this happens to teams like UNLV 

2-0 night was very stressful but in the end enjoyable. 

Friday night away dogs in the CFL have done very well for quite a few years....for me I  won't dismiss that there is some kind of correlation between NCAA and CFL dogs  when they're played on a  Friday.

Nice win on fading UNLV Spottie and also taking NW'ern.....makes all the investigating worth it....

Ton of games tomorrow,...you and I have about half our games in common.....good fortune to the both of us.

P.S. I don't recall there was a deliberate intention of anyone of cutting someone off, etc.,....to me things just kind of dissipated and in actuality I thought you might have been angry about something.

I apologize if that seemed to you like it was a planned ghosting, or whatever.

Maybe you were kidding or having a bad day or bored but it was something about a dart board and my picks.  It in the past now and as long as respect is earned and given I wont look back.  I wasnt mad I just felt as though something was going on and out communication was going south thats all. 

No apology needed, we have exchanged a lot in the past. I just didnt need the drama of explaining it.  We are all good. 

Best wishes as always 

NHL play is Wild + money 

11-18 su the favorites are bad bets and dogs are strong ROI. 

game number < 5 and HF and tpS(playoffs) < 20 and line>-140 and season > 2016 and streak != 0 and streak!= 1 and line<-122

love your style Spottie

on quite a few of these myself

hope u kill it today

enjoy reading your posts!

God bless

You certainly did not offend me.  You are a better and more knowledgeable handicapper than I am.  The fact that you bet scores of more NCAAFB games than I do attests to that.

I would be ecstatic at hitting 57% for a full season.  That very rarely happens.  I usually only rely on queries hitting 59%+ for at least 20 games (the minimum for a binomial test).

I am with you on PUR today (my only bet).  Good luck.

I ran this query after I saw the UAB-ARMY final.  Although I am not a fundamental handicapper, I did have the thought that maybe powerhouse rushing attacks can manhandle markedly weaker teams by dominating the line of scrimmage.  There was a split result - Army and Under.  I don't know what Army's TT was, but I imagine it went over.

Even if I had run the query before the game I would have passed because I usually insist on a 3+ point margin.  Maybe you can improve on this.

p:RY > 285 and line < -22.2 and wins > o:wins + 2.5

This is better:

275 < p:RY < 340 and not 275 < pp:RY < 340 and line < -22.2 and wins > o:wins + 2.5

SU:  81-0 (33.7, 100.0%)

ATS:  56-23-2 (3.7, 70.9%)

Apparently too much rushing success leads to an immediate expectation of regression and/or being overpriced:

p:RY > 340 and line < -22.2 and wins > o:wins + 2.5

ATS:  35-36-1

I am retired and I am pretty much of a loner.  On a daily basis this is about as much communication as I get outside of speaking to librarians or waitresses.  IRL I have a pretty good sense of humor, but I don't have many opportunities to express it in the NFL, NCAAFB or Politics forums.

I hope my apparent brusqueness didn't offend you at any time.  If you visit Los Angeles I'd like to meet face to face.

 Very well done yet again Spottie… thank you. 

@DogbiteWilliams

 very well I appreciate the words.  I am attempting to make this more comfortable with good vibes.  Glad you agree. 

LA is cool, if i make it out ill contact you.  

best wishes on yours thanks for stopping back in. 

Thank you Doctor T

appreciate you stopping in.  

I am trying my best.  This season is a tougher grind 

Best wishes 

1-2 ats

0-1 ats 

0-1 ats

2-2 ats