week=7 and ats streak>4 and H
6-16 ATS
3-10 OVERS if the total is more than 46
BYU
EMCH
ARMY
week = 7 and ats streak > -6 and ats streak < -3 and D and site = home
24-10 ATS
UNC
Kent St
we drop Kent St because they have a lower line than what needs to qualified under the best circumstances:
week = 7 and ats streak > -6 and ats streak < -3 and D and site = home and line < 8 and t:wins = 0
These are 0-3 from the above 24-10 which makes UNC 24-7 situation much more valuable than Kent St.
week = 7 and ats streak > -6 and ats streak < -3 and D and site = home
24-10 ATS
UNC
Kent St
we drop Kent St because they have a lower line than what needs to qualified under the best circumstances:
week = 7 and ats streak > -6 and ats streak < -3 and D and site = home and line < 8 and t:wins = 0
These are 0-3 from the above 24-10 which makes UNC 24-7 situation much more valuable than Kent St.
ats streak<-3 and D and season>2009 and o:wins>2 and 11>week>5
132-78 ats 63%
also if the week is =7
29-8 ATS
Play on :
NC St.
Purdue
UNC
N Westrn
ats streak<-3 and D and season>2009 and o:wins>2 and 11>week>5
132-78 ats 63%
also if the week is =7
29-8 ATS
Play on :
NC St.
Purdue
UNC
N Westrn
11>week>6 and p:ats margin < -18 and p:D and AD and ats streak != -2 and t:wins < 4 and n:site = home and PRSW<7 and line<25 and o:PRSW>1 and ou streak>-3 and 3>t:wins>0
22-6 ATS
Play on :
Purdue
11>week>6 and p:ats margin < -18 and p:D and AD and ats streak != -2 and t:wins < 4 and n:site = home and PRSW<7 and line<25 and o:PRSW>1 and ou streak>-3 and 3>t:wins>0
22-6 ATS
Play on :
Purdue
p:F and p:line <= -3 and p:L and rank<24 and line > -25 and line<=-11 and o:ats streak!= 1 and t:losses = 1 and 13>week>4 and o:wins<7 and o:PRSW>4 and pp:F and o:streak>-2
4-17 ATS
FADES:
ALA
TENN
p:F and p:line <= -3 and p:L and rank<24 and line > -25 and line<=-11 and o:ats streak!= 1 and t:losses = 1 and 13>week>4 and o:wins<7 and o:PRSW>4 and pp:F and o:streak>-2
4-17 ATS
FADES:
ALA
TENN
Keep the data voodoo coming bro....and I use the word 'voodoo' with respect because, those that know how to use it can get results that they desire.
Awesome stuff
Keep the data voodoo coming bro....and I use the word 'voodoo' with respect because, those that know how to use it can get results that they desire.
Awesome stuff
pp:ats margin < -18 and pp:ats margin < -18 and D and p:D and pp:D and season > 2015 and 9 > week > 3 and line>=6 and total<54
37-14 ATS
PLAY ON :
SMISS
pp:ats margin < -18 and pp:ats margin < -18 and D and p:D and pp:D and season > 2015 and 9 > week > 3 and line>=6 and total<54
37-14 ATS
PLAY ON :
SMISS
p:line <= -13 and p:L and 15 > week > 6 and streak != -2 and HF and PRSW > 7 and rank = None and line > -24 and n:A
6-23 ATS
Fade :
J.Mad
p:line <= -13 and p:L and 15 > week > 6 and streak != -2 and HF and PRSW > 7 and rank = None and line > -24 and n:A
6-23 ATS
Fade :
J.Mad
p:F and p:dps > 20 and 10 > PRSW > 7 and rank = None and 12 > week > 3 and site = home
3-17 ATS
Fade:
J'Ville St
add this
and line<=-3
1-16 ATS
p:F and p:dps > 20 and 10 > PRSW > 7 and rank = None and 12 > week > 3 and site = home
3-17 ATS
Fade:
J'Ville St
add this
and line<=-3
1-16 ATS
8>week>5 and ats streak>3 and AF and PRSW<7 and line>=-7
2-15 ATS
Fade:
Marsh
Also this so its double support, but similar query.
11>week>5 and ats streak>3 and AF and PRSW<7 and line>=-7 and p:line>-7
4-23 ATS
8>week>5 and ats streak>3 and AF and PRSW<7 and line>=-7
2-15 ATS
Fade:
Marsh
Also this so its double support, but similar query.
11>week>5 and ats streak>3 and AF and PRSW<7 and line>=-7 and p:line>-7
4-23 ATS
10>week>5 and line<8 and HD and season>2019 and 6>t:wins>1 and 0>ats streak>-3 and o:losses>0 and n:A
take:
FL ATL
FRES
C. MICH
10>week>5 and line<8 and HD and season>2019 and 6>t:wins>1 and 0>ats streak>-3 and o:losses>0 and n:A
take:
FL ATL
FRES
C. MICH
This is a big contributor why I have not been hitting over 55% this season
ats streak>1 and p:points>40 and pp:points>40 and rank=None and p:dps>15 and 8>week>5
this is at 5-27-1 since the 1990’s yet there are 3 qualified fades this week!
that’s astounding.
anyway here are the fades.
Army
N Tex
Jax St
This is a big contributor why I have not been hitting over 55% this season
ats streak>1 and p:points>40 and pp:points>40 and rank=None and p:dps>15 and 8>week>5
this is at 5-27-1 since the 1990’s yet there are 3 qualified fades this week!
that’s astounding.
anyway here are the fades.
Army
N Tex
Jax St
It’s real difficult to fade Army for the 3rd time this season but the books keep adding to the lines. I’d rather take UAB +26.5 than any other game I have attempted to try to see them regress. 6 covers to start the season is extremely difficult. The way they play is extremely different than past seasons. It takes this type of team to get me beat and only a few teams a season can do it.
The last time I lost 3 bets on a team was BYU a few seasons ago. All the other teams that I can remember have regressed before week 7. After this game I will have to wait for the lines to break Army’s winning season . Once it does they will come back from the heavens.
It’s real difficult to fade Army for the 3rd time this season but the books keep adding to the lines. I’d rather take UAB +26.5 than any other game I have attempted to try to see them regress. 6 covers to start the season is extremely difficult. The way they play is extremely different than past seasons. It takes this type of team to get me beat and only a few teams a season can do it.
The last time I lost 3 bets on a team was BYU a few seasons ago. All the other teams that I can remember have regressed before week 7. After this game I will have to wait for the lines to break Army’s winning season . Once it does they will come back from the heavens.
2024 high flying Ranked preseason teams after week 3 :
MIA FL 3-0, 1-2 ATS
Texas 2-0, 1-1 ATS
Clemson 2-0, 1-1
Miss 2-1, 2-1
Tenn 1-1, 1-1
MIZU after opening the season 2-0 ATS after beating the 1st 2 opponents 89-0 now have a 3 game ATS losing streak.
Georgia is 0-4 ATS last 4.
2024 high flying Ranked preseason teams after week 3 :
MIA FL 3-0, 1-2 ATS
Texas 2-0, 1-1 ATS
Clemson 2-0, 1-1
Miss 2-1, 2-1
Tenn 1-1, 1-1
MIZU after opening the season 2-0 ATS after beating the 1st 2 opponents 89-0 now have a 3 game ATS losing streak.
Georgia is 0-4 ATS last 4.
Excited to see your final list bro..... and matchups are key in SOME INSTANCES like Texas AM vs Mizzou last week who were getting Weigman back and on a roll since their first tough loss, plus, Missouri did not match up well with their offense vs TexAM defense strengths and the 12th man homefield inspiring them.
Combining your incredible ATS findings in your data with some checks of matchup and injury info would be deadly for you to sift and come up with a refined set.....
I think I might do that with your list this week for some additional plays. I am up to 4 solid plays + some teasers....
I am not having a great season (11-13 -0.5 Units) BUT am ready to push into overdrive like I can most years + bowl season when this does not happen. When I lose, I lose late in most instances so maybe half the battle is the ATS edge that you are finding here
Excited to see your final list bro..... and matchups are key in SOME INSTANCES like Texas AM vs Mizzou last week who were getting Weigman back and on a roll since their first tough loss, plus, Missouri did not match up well with their offense vs TexAM defense strengths and the 12th man homefield inspiring them.
Combining your incredible ATS findings in your data with some checks of matchup and injury info would be deadly for you to sift and come up with a refined set.....
I think I might do that with your list this week for some additional plays. I am up to 4 solid plays + some teasers....
I am not having a great season (11-13 -0.5 Units) BUT am ready to push into overdrive like I can most years + bowl season when this does not happen. When I lose, I lose late in most instances so maybe half the battle is the ATS edge that you are finding here
Arizona
Coastal Carolina
Oklahoma
LSU
Vandy
NC St
everyone of these teams has been a favorite they qualify in my searches they have all won games and all of them qualify in medium to low consensus this week
I have other plays but no one likes to lose on bad teams. It’s not worth posting those.
Arizona
Coastal Carolina
Oklahoma
LSU
Vandy
NC St
everyone of these teams has been a favorite they qualify in my searches they have all won games and all of them qualify in medium to low consensus this week
I have other plays but no one likes to lose on bad teams. It’s not worth posting those.
Bad teams that extra points are continually added points to this season and or their opponents have extra points too.
UAB both teams added points should be added. This is a great contrarian play.
Purdue
wake forest
air force
Fla Atlantic
Miami Ohio because of Eastern Mich success
S. Flor
Fresno
N Carolina
Bad teams that extra points are continually added points to this season and or their opponents have extra points too.
UAB both teams added points should be added. This is a great contrarian play.
Purdue
wake forest
air force
Fla Atlantic
Miami Ohio because of Eastern Mich success
S. Flor
Fresno
N Carolina
I don’t look to fade Vandy here. The line does not indicate regression even off that massive win. When Vandy is a favorite against a nobody that will be the signal. Still lots of motivation and no bye week to drain momentum. Last year they were so bad, it’s just not time to avoid them as a dog.
strong team getting points and not playing another top 10 team. I actually can make a case for Kenty being in regression as a favorite. They are a strong dog team in most cases.
I don’t look to fade Vandy here. The line does not indicate regression even off that massive win. When Vandy is a favorite against a nobody that will be the signal. Still lots of motivation and no bye week to drain momentum. Last year they were so bad, it’s just not time to avoid them as a dog.
strong team getting points and not playing another top 10 team. I actually can make a case for Kenty being in regression as a favorite. They are a strong dog team in most cases.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.