[
Quote: Originally Posted by
vanzack]
Come on nutjobs, lets hear some retorts on those bible quotes.
Heres a very simple question for you:
How can the bible have the inconsistency of having a commandment of "thou shall not kill" and then have dozens of bible versus outlining when to kill?
I want an answer to this. God wrote the damn book, how can inconsistencies be there? Is it ok to kill, or is it a commandment not to?
![](https://images.covers.com/covers/emoticons/an_popcorn.gif)
[/Quote]
...the KJV was translated in the early 17th century using an archaic form of modern english. in the last 400 yrs, english has changed significantly. unfortunately, the vast majority of those who read the KJV (both believers + unbelievers) are unqualified to know what the text means in many instances because of word meaning changes.
in attempting to demonstrate the contradiction of God's commands to israel and the sixth commandment, atheist often cite the KJV translation, "Thou shalt not kill."
however, like english, hebrew, the language in which most of the old testament was written, uses different words for intentional vs. unintentional killing. the verse translated "Thou shalt not kill" in the KJV translation, is translated "You shall not murder" in modern translations - because these translations represents the real meaning of the hebrew text. the bible in basic english translates the phrase, "Do not put anyone to death without cause." the hebrew word used here is ratsach, which nearly always refers to intentional killing without cause (unless indicated otherwise by context).
hebrew law recognized accidental killing as not punishable. specific cities were designated as "cities of refuge," so that an unintentional killer could flee to escape retribution. the hebrew word for "kill" in this instance is not ratsach, but nakah, which can refer to either premeditated or unintentional killing, depending upon context. other hebrew words also can refer to killing. the punishment for murder was the death sentence. however, to be convicted, there needed to be at least two eyewitnesses. the bible also prescribes that people have a right to defend themselves against attack and use deadly force if necessary.
america today houses states where killing is outlawed, yet the state itself enforces capital punishment. this isnt classed a contradiction to the very human rights it is protecting as a deterrent and punishment. it also is not viewed as a contradiction where a victim is forced to protect themself, family or assets by an intruder.
in the context of the bible, the commandments were made for man and not man for the commandments. so my advice would be for any individual to look at specific cases.
what sports do you bet on vanzack to kill the bordom?
![](https://images.covers.com/covers/emoticons/Peace_5.gif)