You call me a fool but you don't understand the difference between instinct and conscience thought. You're a joke.
So if i see someone in a house fire, high risk, i know if i go in there , the chances that i might die is very high, but i am going in there cause it might mean i will get laid? I think i have heard everything now.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Dutch1976:
You call me a fool but you don't understand the difference between instinct and conscience thought. You're a joke.
So if i see someone in a house fire, high risk, i know if i go in there , the chances that i might die is very high, but i am going in there cause it might mean i will get laid? I think i have heard everything now.
I'm sorry guys. I can't do this anymore. There's no point. This will be my final post. There have been so many stupid comments here, but nothing tops the claim that scientists don't know how lightning works...yes they do...they completely understand it and can probably recreate it if they wanted to (after all, they can almost recreate a supernova, i think they can manage lightning). I'm also sick of being asked to prove that which doesn't need to be proved. I am not making a claim that something magical exists. Therefore, I don't have to prove anything. The burden of proof always rests with the side making the claim, especially when that claim defies the laws of physics. If you want me to believe the laws of physics can be broken by anyone or anything, you have to prove it, I don't have to prove that the laws of physics can't be broken. That's how experiments work. Evolution is not about passing on your genes. It is about adapting to your environment. It is a process. It is a how, not a why...stop conflating the two. Here is a fact: the bible was written by over 40 authors over the course of 1500 years. Try playing a game of "telephone" with 39 friends and see what the phrase ends up being when it gets back to you. That's all you need to know to debunk the bible as a valid source (not to mention the fallacies, contradictions, and parts that literally have a 0% chance of being true-but we disregard those as "metaphors" because they don't conform to what the drone wants the bible to be). In conclusion, even though we cannot disprove the existence of god, we already know with 100% certainty it isn't absolutely necessary to invoke a creator to explain the universe so if you do so, you are doing it by choice, because you believe, not because there has to be one. So, is it still theoretically possible there is a god? Yes. But those odds are undoubtedly below 50% and if I were to place a line on it, I'd say No God -100000000. Yes God +50000000. It's been real folks. I promise I will not be responding to any future questions. Good luck to those that take over for me. I am done.
Something from nothing is?
0
Quote Originally Posted by KittyKatz286:
I'm sorry guys. I can't do this anymore. There's no point. This will be my final post. There have been so many stupid comments here, but nothing tops the claim that scientists don't know how lightning works...yes they do...they completely understand it and can probably recreate it if they wanted to (after all, they can almost recreate a supernova, i think they can manage lightning). I'm also sick of being asked to prove that which doesn't need to be proved. I am not making a claim that something magical exists. Therefore, I don't have to prove anything. The burden of proof always rests with the side making the claim, especially when that claim defies the laws of physics. If you want me to believe the laws of physics can be broken by anyone or anything, you have to prove it, I don't have to prove that the laws of physics can't be broken. That's how experiments work. Evolution is not about passing on your genes. It is about adapting to your environment. It is a process. It is a how, not a why...stop conflating the two. Here is a fact: the bible was written by over 40 authors over the course of 1500 years. Try playing a game of "telephone" with 39 friends and see what the phrase ends up being when it gets back to you. That's all you need to know to debunk the bible as a valid source (not to mention the fallacies, contradictions, and parts that literally have a 0% chance of being true-but we disregard those as "metaphors" because they don't conform to what the drone wants the bible to be). In conclusion, even though we cannot disprove the existence of god, we already know with 100% certainty it isn't absolutely necessary to invoke a creator to explain the universe so if you do so, you are doing it by choice, because you believe, not because there has to be one. So, is it still theoretically possible there is a god? Yes. But those odds are undoubtedly below 50% and if I were to place a line on it, I'd say No God -100000000. Yes God +50000000. It's been real folks. I promise I will not be responding to any future questions. Good luck to those that take over for me. I am done.
Yes I'm serious dutch boy! Just recently I was watching a program on either the Discovery Channel or the Weather Channel, can't remember exactly which it was but it was about lightning. I clearly heard them say that scientists still don't fully understand the causes of lightning. These guys had all these high speed cameras aimed at the sky hoping for lightning strikes so they could evaluate what they see.
So dutch boy you better start watching some discovery channel or weather channel more often to learn something....stupid!...lol
You are correct on this point. The method of cloud charging still cannot be fully explained yet. But in due time, they will figure it out.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SirJohnDrake:
Yes I'm serious dutch boy! Just recently I was watching a program on either the Discovery Channel or the Weather Channel, can't remember exactly which it was but it was about lightning. I clearly heard them say that scientists still don't fully understand the causes of lightning. These guys had all these high speed cameras aimed at the sky hoping for lightning strikes so they could evaluate what they see.
So dutch boy you better start watching some discovery channel or weather channel more often to learn something....stupid!...lol
You are correct on this point. The method of cloud charging still cannot be fully explained yet. But in due time, they will figure it out.
God is subtle - yet profound and unmistakeably Holy. He does not co-mingle with the profane.If he calls you(faith)you get to realize it as you tune in and practice obedience(not sinning)The Holy Spirit convicts you of your practice of wrongdoings(an acutely refined conscience)and as you abandon those practices -something of extraordinary value displaces it.This foundation gets built upon "line upon line -precept upon precept' The anger of misunderstanding diminishes - you begin to cherish God's exacting nature and learn to rely upon it He is truly majestic and if you are His inheritance -as many of us truly are - we come to get an inkling of this. Remember this is all HIs Idea-(creation) Pray for your enemies
0
God is subtle - yet profound and unmistakeably Holy. He does not co-mingle with the profane.If he calls you(faith)you get to realize it as you tune in and practice obedience(not sinning)The Holy Spirit convicts you of your practice of wrongdoings(an acutely refined conscience)and as you abandon those practices -something of extraordinary value displaces it.This foundation gets built upon "line upon line -precept upon precept' The anger of misunderstanding diminishes - you begin to cherish God's exacting nature and learn to rely upon it He is truly majestic and if you are His inheritance -as many of us truly are - we come to get an inkling of this. Remember this is all HIs Idea-(creation) Pray for your enemies
God is subtle - yet profound and unmistakeably Holy. He does not co-mingle with the profane.If he calls you(faith)you get to realize it as you tune in and practice obedience(not sinning)The Holy Spirit convicts you of your practice of wrongdoings(an acutely refined conscience)and as you abandon those practices -something of extraordinary value displaces it.This foundation gets built upon "line upon line -precept upon precept' The anger of misunderstanding diminishes - you begin to cherish God's exacting nature and learn to rely upon it He is truly majestic and if you are His inheritance -as many of us truly are - we come to get an inkling of this. Remember this is all HIs Idea-(creation) Pray for your enemies
0
Quote Originally Posted by Waz44:
God is subtle - yet profound and unmistakeably Holy. He does not co-mingle with the profane.If he calls you(faith)you get to realize it as you tune in and practice obedience(not sinning)The Holy Spirit convicts you of your practice of wrongdoings(an acutely refined conscience)and as you abandon those practices -something of extraordinary value displaces it.This foundation gets built upon "line upon line -precept upon precept' The anger of misunderstanding diminishes - you begin to cherish God's exacting nature and learn to rely upon it He is truly majestic and if you are His inheritance -as many of us truly are - we come to get an inkling of this. Remember this is all HIs Idea-(creation) Pray for your enemies
God is subtle - yet profound and unmistakeably Holy. He does not co-mingle with the profane.If he calls you(faith)you get to realize it as you tune in and practice obedience(not sinning)The Holy Spirit convicts you of your practice of wrongdoings(an acutely refined conscience)and as you abandon those practices -something of extraordinary value displaces it.This foundation gets built upon "line upon line -precept upon precept' The anger of misunderstanding diminishes - you begin to cherish God's exacting nature and learn to rely upon it He is truly majestic and if you are His inheritance -as many of us truly are - we come to get an inkling of this. Remember this is all HIs Idea-(creation) Pray for your enemies
Aren't you special...
0
Quote Originally Posted by Waz44:
God is subtle - yet profound and unmistakeably Holy. He does not co-mingle with the profane.If he calls you(faith)you get to realize it as you tune in and practice obedience(not sinning)The Holy Spirit convicts you of your practice of wrongdoings(an acutely refined conscience)and as you abandon those practices -something of extraordinary value displaces it.This foundation gets built upon "line upon line -precept upon precept' The anger of misunderstanding diminishes - you begin to cherish God's exacting nature and learn to rely upon it He is truly majestic and if you are His inheritance -as many of us truly are - we come to get an inkling of this. Remember this is all HIs Idea-(creation) Pray for your enemies
I'm sorry guys. I can't do this anymore. There's no point. This will be my final post. There have been so many stupid comments here, but nothing tops the claim that scientists don't know how lightning works...yes they do...they completely understand it and can probably recreate it if they wanted to (after all, they can almost recreate a supernova, i think they can manage lightning). I'm also sick of being asked to prove that which doesn't need to be proved. I am not making a claim that something magical exists. Therefore, I don't have to prove anything. The burden of proof always rests with the side making the claim, especially when that claim defies the laws of physics. If you want me to believe the laws of physics can be broken by anyone or anything, you have to prove it, I don't have to prove that the laws of physics can't be broken. That's how experiments work. Evolution is not about passing on your genes. It is about adapting to your environment. It is a process. It is a how, not a why...stop conflating the two. Here is a fact: the bible was written by over 40 authors over the course of 1500 years. Try playing a game of "telephone" with 39 friends and see what the phrase ends up being when it gets back to you. That's all you need to know to debunk the bible as a valid source (not to mention the fallacies, contradictions, and parts that literally have a 0% chance of being true-but we disregard those as "metaphors" because they don't conform to what the drone wants the bible to be). In conclusion, even though we cannot disprove the existence of god, we already know with 100% certainty it isn't absolutely necessary to invoke a creator to explain the universe so if you do so, you are doing it by choice, because you believe, not because there has to be one. So, is it still theoretically possible there is a god? Yes. But those odds are undoubtedly below 50% and if I were to place a line on it, I'd say No God -100000000. Yes God +50000000. It's been real folks. I promise I will not be responding to any future questions. Good luck to those that take over for me. I am done.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KittyKatz286:
I'm sorry guys. I can't do this anymore. There's no point. This will be my final post. There have been so many stupid comments here, but nothing tops the claim that scientists don't know how lightning works...yes they do...they completely understand it and can probably recreate it if they wanted to (after all, they can almost recreate a supernova, i think they can manage lightning). I'm also sick of being asked to prove that which doesn't need to be proved. I am not making a claim that something magical exists. Therefore, I don't have to prove anything. The burden of proof always rests with the side making the claim, especially when that claim defies the laws of physics. If you want me to believe the laws of physics can be broken by anyone or anything, you have to prove it, I don't have to prove that the laws of physics can't be broken. That's how experiments work. Evolution is not about passing on your genes. It is about adapting to your environment. It is a process. It is a how, not a why...stop conflating the two. Here is a fact: the bible was written by over 40 authors over the course of 1500 years. Try playing a game of "telephone" with 39 friends and see what the phrase ends up being when it gets back to you. That's all you need to know to debunk the bible as a valid source (not to mention the fallacies, contradictions, and parts that literally have a 0% chance of being true-but we disregard those as "metaphors" because they don't conform to what the drone wants the bible to be). In conclusion, even though we cannot disprove the existence of god, we already know with 100% certainty it isn't absolutely necessary to invoke a creator to explain the universe so if you do so, you are doing it by choice, because you believe, not because there has to be one. So, is it still theoretically possible there is a god? Yes. But those odds are undoubtedly below 50% and if I were to place a line on it, I'd say No God -100000000. Yes God +50000000. It's been real folks. I promise I will not be responding to any future questions. Good luck to those that take over for me. I am done.
i agree. perhaps nothing encapsulates the rostos/drake position better than the statement, scientists don't know how lightning works. let's end this thread on that one.
however, i remain unconvinced by KK's position and have been persuaded, at least partially, by the rostos/drake side. for that reason, i am already working on the next religion thread tentatively entitled: rainbows are the pathway to heaven and the infidels KK and system can't prove us wrong because they've never climbed one.
i expect KK to join that thread and try to disprove me with all that logic and science mumbo jumbo they apparently teach in schools outside of the bible belt.
0
i agree. perhaps nothing encapsulates the rostos/drake position better than the statement, scientists don't know how lightning works. let's end this thread on that one.
however, i remain unconvinced by KK's position and have been persuaded, at least partially, by the rostos/drake side. for that reason, i am already working on the next religion thread tentatively entitled: rainbows are the pathway to heaven and the infidels KK and system can't prove us wrong because they've never climbed one.
i expect KK to join that thread and try to disprove me with all that logic and science mumbo jumbo they apparently teach in schools outside of the bible belt.
(my spellcheck keeps freezing so sorry, it's not gonning to be pretty)
The left took God out of schools sex,guns,drugs are fine to have though
Club no one can prove God. Science is not 100% sure about how things became, but this doesn't make it unuseful, i love science (science degree), science is nothing less than Vital. I feel Religon(cathloics) has done a lot to oppress science, very sad. Jesus told a man to put mud on his eyes and he would see, why do this? he could have just made the blind man see, a snap of the finger.people often read these stories and only see a "what" but never ask why,how. I feel Jesus adores science and medican. Einstein wrote about science and religion being branches of the same tree. some of us worship the creator, some of us worship the creation.
0
(my spellcheck keeps freezing so sorry, it's not gonning to be pretty)
The left took God out of schools sex,guns,drugs are fine to have though
Club no one can prove God. Science is not 100% sure about how things became, but this doesn't make it unuseful, i love science (science degree), science is nothing less than Vital. I feel Religon(cathloics) has done a lot to oppress science, very sad. Jesus told a man to put mud on his eyes and he would see, why do this? he could have just made the blind man see, a snap of the finger.people often read these stories and only see a "what" but never ask why,how. I feel Jesus adores science and medican. Einstein wrote about science and religion being branches of the same tree. some of us worship the creator, some of us worship the creation.
this jesus fella seemed like a pretty good guy, talking about treating everyone well and helping others and not being materialistic in any. it's all the people who seem to have distorted his message and use religion for negative reasons, political power and financial gain that i have a problem with.
0
this jesus fella seemed like a pretty good guy, talking about treating everyone well and helping others and not being materialistic in any. it's all the people who seem to have distorted his message and use religion for negative reasons, political power and financial gain that i have a problem with.
So if i see someone in a house fire, high risk, i know if i go in there , the chances that i might die is very high, but i am going in there cause it might mean i will get laid? I think i have heard everything now.
I'm guessing you don't truly understand what instinct means.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:
So if i see someone in a house fire, high risk, i know if i go in there , the chances that i might die is very high, but i am going in there cause it might mean i will get laid? I think i have heard everything now.
I'm guessing you don't truly understand what instinct means.
Yes I'm serious dutch boy! Just recently I was watching a program on either the Discovery Channel or the Weather Channel, can't remember exactly which it was but it was about lightning. I clearly heard them say that scientists still don't fully understand the causes of lightning. These guys had all these high speed cameras aimed at the sky hoping for lightning strikes so they could evaluate what they see.
So dutch boy you better start watching some discovery channel or weather channel more often to learn something....stupid!...lol
Hey there Johhny Drake!! So you should have no problem whatsoever finding several dozen websites that expalin scientist not knowing how lightning works..I look forward to your links!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by SirJohnDrake:
Yes I'm serious dutch boy! Just recently I was watching a program on either the Discovery Channel or the Weather Channel, can't remember exactly which it was but it was about lightning. I clearly heard them say that scientists still don't fully understand the causes of lightning. These guys had all these high speed cameras aimed at the sky hoping for lightning strikes so they could evaluate what they see.
So dutch boy you better start watching some discovery channel or weather channel more often to learn something....stupid!...lol
Hey there Johhny Drake!! So you should have no problem whatsoever finding several dozen websites that expalin scientist not knowing how lightning works..I look forward to your links!!
Religion is just a word, Look in your Bible (if you have one) Jesus didnt come to preach a religion, He came to tell us about God, Even Jesus , mentioned that religion is just a word, As for me, I am NOT any different from anyone else, I am a sinner also, just like everyone else, the only difference in a Christrian and a non-christian is one is saved by grace, and the other is not. Figure out which one you are.
0
Religion is just a word, Look in your Bible (if you have one) Jesus didnt come to preach a religion, He came to tell us about God, Even Jesus , mentioned that religion is just a word, As for me, I am NOT any different from anyone else, I am a sinner also, just like everyone else, the only difference in a Christrian and a non-christian is one is saved by grace, and the other is not. Figure out which one you are.
Religion is just a word, Look in your Bible (if you have one) Jesus didnt come to preach a religion, He came to tell us about God, Even Jesus , mentioned that religion is just a word, As for me, I am NOT any different from anyone else, I am a sinner also, just like everyone else, the only difference in a Christrian and a non-christian is one is saved by grace, and the other is not. Figure out which one you are.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Lttlmac:
Religion is just a word, Look in your Bible (if you have one) Jesus didnt come to preach a religion, He came to tell us about God, Even Jesus , mentioned that religion is just a word, As for me, I am NOT any different from anyone else, I am a sinner also, just like everyone else, the only difference in a Christrian and a non-christian is one is saved by grace, and the other is not. Figure out which one you are.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.