1.) The towers fell in free-fall speed. Freefall speed for the towers, from 1362 feet, is between 8.79 and 9.22 seconds. Every video of the towers collapsing that I've seen so far, including ones in this thread, have show the towers falling in roughly 9.5 seconds or less. Controlled demolition videos shown side by side with Tower 7's collapse are nearly identical.
No one has successfully refuted this claim so far. If you can, I'm willing to change my stance on the issue and accept your stance as truth, and stop reaching for conspriracy.
2.) The cell phone calls from Flight 93 were released to the public. 13 total calls cal from cell phones while the aircraft was over 20,000 feet, and some while the aircraft was over 30,000 feet. There were a number of "air phone" calls, I'm not addressing those. I want to address the cell phone calls.
It is a statistical impossibility for even 1 of these cell phone calls to have taken place, let alone 13. More than half of the cell phone calls took place for over 3 minutes each. There is a .001 chance for any of these calls to have lasted for more than 1 second.
No one has successfully refuted this claim so far. If you can, I'm willing to change my stance on the issue and accept your stance as truth, and stop reaching for conspriracy.
3.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods
This from wikipedia. A detailed summary of Operation Northwoods. You can read it for yourself, but it basically describes what the U.S. Government was capable of in 1962. For all of you (and there has been many) that are saying stuff like "the governement would never do this" etc, how can you possibly explain Operation Northwoods to me?
a.) Operation Northwoods was meant to gather public support to attack Cuba, a recently aquinted communist nation under Fidel Castro.
Comparision: 9/11 was meant to gather public support to attack Iraw, a nation which was ruled by a "brutal dictator" and housed the majority of the worlds oil supply.
b.) Operation Northwoods discussed the "hijacking" of commercial airliners and flying them into buildings in the Miami area of Florida. These hijackings would however be of unmanned aircraft, and flown by drone planes into the targets. Civilian casualties would be at a minimum. The U.S. would essentially blame Cuba for the terrorist attacks, resulting in a creating of public support for invasion of Cuba.
Comparision: 9/11 flew commercial airliners into the WTC in New York, and claimed that the planes were "hijacked" by a middle eastern terrorist group called Al-Quadia. This led to a creation of public support for a war in Iraq, which the U.S. invaded less than 2 years later.
c.) This from the above link on wikipedia:
"It is possible to create an incident which will demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has attacked and shot down a chartered civil airliner en route from the United States to Jamaica, Guatemala, Panama or Venezuela. The destination would be chosen only to cause the flight plan route to cross Cuba. The passengers could be a group of college students off on a holiday or any grouping of persons with a common interest to support chartering a non-scheduled flight. "
"An aircraft at Eglin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CIA proprietary organization in the Miami area. At a designated time the duplicate would be substituted for the actual civil aircraft and would be loaded with the selected passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases. The actual registered aircraft would be converted to a drone."
"Take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rendezvous south of Florida. From the rendezvous point the passenger-carrying aircraft will descend to minimum altitude and go directly into an auxiliary field at Eglin AFB where arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the aircraft to its original status. The drone aircraft meanwhile will continue to fly the filed flight plan. When over Cuba the drone will begin transmitting on the international distress frequency a "MAY DAY" message stating he is under attack by Cuban MIG aircraft. The transmission will be interrupted by destruction of the aircraft which will be triggered by radio signal. This will allow ICAO radio[16] stations in the Western Hemisphere to tell the US what has happened to the aircraft instead of the US trying to "sell" the incident"
Comparison: 9/11 created the public out cry for war after United Flight 93 crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, after a group of civilians attempted to overthrow the middle-eastern hijackers. Amidst reports from the 9/11 commission that Flight 93 actually landed, the government later revealed that these reports, coming from actual NORAD generals, were completely false. The NORAD generals were later removed from active duty.
No one has successfully refuted this claim so far. If you can, I'm willing to change my stance on the issue and accept your stance as truth, and stop reaching for conspriracy.
Address those 3 points, and I'll gladly shutup and never speak of 9/11 again.
Hot Forum Topics
